Literature DB >> 3046328

Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket.

J Odegaard1, D Segner.   

Abstract

One hundred twenty bovine teeth were bonded with two types of metal brackets and a new ceramic bracket for comparison. Two different adhesives were used, a so-called no-mix and a paste/paste adhesive. The shear bond strength of the ceramic bracket was found to be superior for both adhesives. Bond failure with the ceramic bracket occurred predominantly in the enamel/adhesive interface; the failure site for the metal bracket was mainly in the bracket/adhesive interface. It is concluded that the bond strength between the ceramic bracket and the adhesive in shear mode is stronger than that between the adhesive and the enamel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3046328     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90028-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  18 in total

1.  [A temperature rise in the dental pulp during the electrothermal removal of ceramic brackets].

Authors:  T Ruppenthal; M A Baumann
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-04

2.  [Elemental analytical and quantitative morphometric determination of the synthetic resin residues and enamel avulsion after the removal of metal brackets].

Authors:  T Ruppenthal; U Stratmann; H G Sergl; D Czech
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-04

3.  CO2 laser as auxiliary in the debonding of ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Rodrigo Teixeira Macri; Fabrício Augusto de Lima; Luciano Bachmann; Rodrigo Galo; Fábio Lourenço Romano; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: Comparative In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohd Younus Ansari; Deepak K Agarwal; Ankur Gupta; Preeti Bhattacharya; Juhi Ansar; Ravi Bhandari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  Orthodontic bracket debonding: risk of enamel fracture.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Philipp Winterhalder; Nikola Holberg; Andrea Wichelhaus; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material.

Authors:  Shaymaa E Elsaka
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Does the Seating Force Affect the Shear Bond Strength of Brackets? An InVitro Study.

Authors:  Oral Sökücü; Seher Yeşildal; Rıdvan Okşayan; İrfan Şimşek
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-01

8.  Effects of CO(2) laser debonding of a ceramic bracket on the mechanical properties of enamel.

Authors:  Masahiro Iijima; Yoshitaka Yasuda; Takeshi Muguruma; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Bracket base remnants after orthodontic debonding.

Authors:  Matteo Zanarini; Antonio Gracco; Monica Lattuca; Silvia Marchionni; Maria Rosaria Gatto; Giulio Alessandri Bonetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  In vitro physical, chemical, and biological evaluation of commercially available metal orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Joo Hyoung Kim; Jung Yul Cha; Chung Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.