Literature DB >> 30463104

Specialisation and diversity of multiple trophic groups are promoted by different forest features.

Caterina Penone1, Eric Allan1, Santiago Soliveres2, María R Felipe-Lucia1, Martin M Gossner3, Sebastian Seibold4, Nadja K Simons4, Peter Schall5, Fons van der Plas6, Peter Manning7, Rubén D Manzanedo8,9, Steffen Boch1,10, Daniel Prati1, Christian Ammer5, Jürgen Bauhus11, François Buscot12,13, Martin Ehbrecht5, Kezia Goldmann12, Kirsten Jung14, Jörg Müller15,16, Jörg C Müller17,18, Rodica Pena19, Andrea Polle19, Swen C Renner20, Liliane Ruess21, Ingo Schönig22, Marion Schrumpf22, Emily F Solly22,23, Marco Tschapka14,24, Wolfgang W Weisser4, Tesfaye Wubet12,13, Markus Fischer1,7.   

Abstract

While forest management strongly influences biodiversity, it remains unclear how the structural and compositional changes caused by management affect different community dimensions (e.g. richness, specialisation, abundance or completeness) and how this differs between taxa. We assessed the effects of nine forest features (representing stand structure, heterogeneity and tree composition) on thirteen above- and belowground trophic groups of plants, animals, fungi and bacteria in 150 temperate forest plots differing in their management type. Canopy cover decreased light resources, which increased community specialisation but reduced overall diversity and abundance. Features increasing resource types and diversifying microhabitats (admixing of oaks and conifers) were important and mostly affected richness. Belowground groups responded differently to those aboveground and had weaker responses to most forest features. Our results show that we need to consider forest features rather than broad management types and highlight the importance of considering several groups and community dimensions to better inform conservation.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity exploratories; dark diversity; forest management; global change; land-use; multidiversity; specialisation; temperate forests

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30463104     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  13 in total

1.  Heterogeneity-diversity relationships differ between and within trophic levels in temperate forests.

Authors:  Lea Heidrich; Soyeon Bae; Shaun Levick; Sebastian Seibold; Wolfgang Weisser; Peter Krzystek; Paul Magdon; Thomas Nauss; Peter Schall; Alla Serebryanyk; Stephan Wöllauer; Christian Ammer; Claus Bässler; Inken Doerfler; Markus Fischer; Martin M Gossner; Marco Heurich; Torsten Hothorn; Kirsten Jung; Holger Kreft; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Nadja Simons; Simon Thorn; Jörg Müller
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Beetle diversity is higher in sunny forests due to higher microclimatic heterogeneity in deadwood.

Authors:  Sebastian Seibold; Jonas Hagge; Ludwig Lettenmaier; Claus Bässler; Roland Brandl; Axel Gruppe; Jörg Müller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Changes in plant-herbivore network structure and robustness along land-use intensity gradients in grasslands and forests.

Authors:  Felix Neff; Martin Brändle; Didem Ambarlı; Christian Ammer; Jürgen Bauhus; Steffen Boch; Norbert Hölzel; Valentin H Klaus; Till Kleinebecker; Daniel Prati; Peter Schall; Deborah Schäfer; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Sebastian Seibold; Nadja K Simons; Wolfgang W Weisser; Loïc Pellissier; Martin M Gossner
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Diversity and functional structure of soil animal communities suggest soil animal food webs to be buffered against changes in forest land use.

Authors:  Melanie M Pollierer; Bernhard Klarner; David Ott; Christoph Digel; Roswitha B Ehnes; Bernhard Eitzinger; Georgia Erdmann; Ulrich Brose; Mark Maraun; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Large, old trees define the vertical, horizontal, and seasonal distributions of a poison frog.

Authors:  Edmund W Basham; Macario González-Pinzón; Angel Romero-Marcucci; Noah Carl; J Alex Baecher; Brett R Scheffers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Dark diversity reveals importance of biotic resources and competition for plant diversity across habitats.

Authors:  Camilla Fløjgaard; Jose W Valdez; Lars Dalby; Jesper Erenskjold Moeslund; Kevin K Clausen; Rasmus Ejrnæs; Meelis Pärtel; Ane Kirstine Brunbjerg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Climatic and vegetational drivers of insect beta diversity at the continental scale.

Authors:  Douglas Chesters; Philip Beckschäfer; Michael C Orr; Sarah J Adamowicz; Kwok-Pan Chun; Chao-Dong Zhu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Local and Landscape Effects on Carrion-Associated Rove Beetle (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) Communities in German Forests.

Authors:  Sandra Weithmann; Jonas Kuppler; Gregor Degasperi; Sandra Steiger; Manfred Ayasse; Christian von Hoermann
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  How land-use intensity affects sexual and parthenogenetic oribatid mites in temperate forests and grasslands in Germany.

Authors:  Katja Wehner; Romina Schuster; Nadja K Simons; Roy A Norton; Nico Blüthgen; Michael Heethoff
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Radar vision in the mapping of forest biodiversity from space.

Authors:  Soyeon Bae; Shaun R Levick; Lea Heidrich; Paul Magdon; Benjamin F Leutner; Stephan Wöllauer; Alla Serebryanyk; Thomas Nauss; Peter Krzystek; Martin M Gossner; Peter Schall; Christoph Heibl; Claus Bässler; Inken Doerfler; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Franz-Sebastian Krah; Heike Culmsee; Kirsten Jung; Marco Heurich; Markus Fischer; Sebastian Seibold; Simon Thorn; Tobias Gerlach; Torsten Hothorn; Wolfgang W Weisser; Jörg Müller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.