| Literature DB >> 30463104 |
Caterina Penone1, Eric Allan1, Santiago Soliveres2, María R Felipe-Lucia1, Martin M Gossner3, Sebastian Seibold4, Nadja K Simons4, Peter Schall5, Fons van der Plas6, Peter Manning7, Rubén D Manzanedo8,9, Steffen Boch1,10, Daniel Prati1, Christian Ammer5, Jürgen Bauhus11, François Buscot12,13, Martin Ehbrecht5, Kezia Goldmann12, Kirsten Jung14, Jörg Müller15,16, Jörg C Müller17,18, Rodica Pena19, Andrea Polle19, Swen C Renner20, Liliane Ruess21, Ingo Schönig22, Marion Schrumpf22, Emily F Solly22,23, Marco Tschapka14,24, Wolfgang W Weisser4, Tesfaye Wubet12,13, Markus Fischer1,7.
Abstract
While forest management strongly influences biodiversity, it remains unclear how the structural and compositional changes caused by management affect different community dimensions (e.g. richness, specialisation, abundance or completeness) and how this differs between taxa. We assessed the effects of nine forest features (representing stand structure, heterogeneity and tree composition) on thirteen above- and belowground trophic groups of plants, animals, fungi and bacteria in 150 temperate forest plots differing in their management type. Canopy cover decreased light resources, which increased community specialisation but reduced overall diversity and abundance. Features increasing resource types and diversifying microhabitats (admixing of oaks and conifers) were important and mostly affected richness. Belowground groups responded differently to those aboveground and had weaker responses to most forest features. Our results show that we need to consider forest features rather than broad management types and highlight the importance of considering several groups and community dimensions to better inform conservation.Entities:
Keywords: biodiversity exploratories; dark diversity; forest management; global change; land-use; multidiversity; specialisation; temperate forests
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30463104 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Lett ISSN: 1461-023X Impact factor: 9.492