Literature DB >> 30462723

Lactobacillus plantarum 299V improves the microbiological quality of legume sprouts and effectively survives in these carriers during cold storage and in vitro digestion.

Michał Świeca1, Monika Kordowska-Wiater2, Monika Pytka2, Urszula Gawlik-Dziki1, Justyna Bochnak1, Urszula Złotek1, Barbara Baraniak1.   

Abstract

Probiotics improve consumers' health and additionally may positively influence the microbiological and organoleptic quality of food. In the study, legume sprouts were inoculated with Lactobacilllus plantarum 299V to produce a new functional product ensuring the growth and survival of the probiotic and high microbiological quality of the final product. Legume sprouts, which are an excellent source of nutrients, were proposed as alternative carriers for the probiotic. The key factors influencing the production of probiotic-rich sprouts include the temperature (25°C) of sprouting and methods of inoculation (soaking seeds in a suspension of probiotics). Compared to the control sprouts, the sprouts enriched with the probiotic were characterized by lower mesophilic bacterial counts. In the case of fresh and stored probiotic-rich sprouts, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) accounted for a majority of total microorganisms. The Lb. plantarum population was also stable during the cold storage. The high count of LAB observed in the digest confirmed the fact that the studied sprouts are effective carriers for probiotics and ensure their survival in the harmful conditions of the digestive tract in an in vitro model. Enrichment of legume sprouts with probiotics is a successful attempt and yields products for a new branch of functional foods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30462723      PMCID: PMC6248997          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Probiotics are “live strains of strictly selected microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” [1], [2]. In nature, Lactobacillus plantarum is found in a variety of ecological niches, ranging from vegetables and fermented food (e.g. vegetables, cheeses, meat) to the human gastrointestinal tract [3], [4]. Lb. plantarum 299V is widely used as a single probiotic or in synbiotic formulations and exhibits a wide range of positive effects on human health. The effectiveness of Lb. plantarum 299V for treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, diarrheas), allergic diseases (e.g., atopic dermatitis), obesity, insulin resistance syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease has been confirmed by many clinical studies [5], [6], [7]. Furthermore, probiotic strains of Lb. plantarum are also responsible for immunomodulation (increasing human immunity), and can thus be used as a prophylactic agent and/or cure for autoimmune disorders, inflammation, and different types of cancers and side effects associated with cancer [8], [9]. Probiotics are usually delivered as food supplements in the form of tablets or capsules [1]. In such formulations, they are usually combined with prebiotics, which are selective substrates for one or a limited number of probiotics [5], [10]. On the other hand, probiotics can also positively influence the microbiological and organoleptic quality of food; thus, they are widely incorporated into traditional food products, e.g., dairy products, fermented vegetables, and meats [3], [11], [12]. In recent years, some alternative matrices, e.g., chocolate, fruit drink, and cut fruits have been employed as carriers for these beneficial microorganisms [13], [14]. This need for alternative matrices is related to the new diet habits, e.g., veganism and/or the higher number of consumers with diet restrictions such as those with lactose intolerance, allergies, and cholesterol restriction. Legumes are an excellent source of nutrients (including resistant starch, which can make them effective prebiotics) and components with well-documented pro-health properties, e.g., fiber, phenolics, or vitamins [15], [16]. Additionally, the quality of pulses can be improved by sprouting, i.e. a process effectively increasing nutrient digestibility, bioavailability of minerals, and the content of low-molecular weight antioxidants [17], [18]. Sprouted food is susceptible to microbiological invasion due to the presence of simple nutrients (free sugars, vitamins, and amino acids), high content of water, and the fact that seeds used for germination cannot be sterilized [19], [20]. To preserve the shelf life of sprouts, many techniques are employed including chemical (limited by formation of by-products, which could have implications for human health) [21] and physical treatments [22]. A new functional food based on legume sprouts and Lb. plantarum was designed for the first time. It was assumed that such a combination ensures both the growth and survival of the probiotic and high microbiological quality of the final product. The factors affecting production of probiotic-rich sprouts, including selection of legume species, conditions of germination, and methods for inoculation with the probiotics, were optimized in the screening studies. For the selected preparations, microbiological quality (degree of contamination) and the Lb. plantarum survival efficiency during cold storage and in vitro digestion were determined.

Materials and methods

Materials

All chemicals used for cultivation of sprouts and microbiological media were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich company (Poznan, Poland) and BTL Ltd. (Łodz, Poland). Soybean, lentil, adzuki bean, and mung bean seeds were purchased from PNOS S.A. in Ozarów Mazowiecki, Poland. The Lb. plantarum 299V strain was isolated from a commercial probiotic preparation. The culture was tested for cell morphology; biochemical tests and 16S rRNA sequencing were performed as well. Bacterial stocks used for the inoculation were stored at –80°C in MRS broth with 20% (v/v) glycerol. Prior to inoculation, aerobic cultures on MRS agar were cultivated twice for 24 h at 37°C. Then, the colonies were sterilely collected from Petri dishes, suspended in water, and used for inoculation of the sprouts. For preparation of the inoculum, the bacterial concentration was estimated by optical density (OD) analysis at 600 nm using a spectrophotometer Smart Spec Plus (Bio-Rad, USA). A previously determined standard curve was used to determine the number of cells in the suspension at the level of 9.00 log10 CFU/mL on the basis of the OD value.

Production of probiotic-rich sprouts

Sprouting conditions

Seeds were disinfected in 1% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 10 min, drained, and washed with distilled water until they reached neutral pH. Then, they were soaked in distilled water (C, control) or a Lb. plantarum 299V water suspension (1 × 108 CFU per 1 g of seeds (8.00 log 10 CFU/ g)) (S, soaked with the probiotic). Lentil, soybean, adzuki bean, and mung bean seeds were soaked for 4, 4, 6, and 8 h, respectively. The seeds (approximately 12 g per plate) were dark-germinated for 4 days in a growth chamber (SANYO MLR-350H) on Petri dishes (Ø 125 mm) lined with absorbent paper. Seedlings were sprayed daily with 5 mL of Milli-Q water (C, S) or 5 mL of water suspension of the probiotic only on the 1st day of cultivation (1 × 108 CFU per 1 g of seeds (8.00 log 10 CFU/ g)) (W, watered with the probiotic). Sprouting was carried out at 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C (25, 30, and 35, respectively) with relative humidity 90%. In the screening studies, the sprouts were manually collected after 4 days and analyzed for sprouting efficiency, biomass accumulation, and the number of viable lactic acid bacteria [23]. During the production of the probiotic-rich sprouts, 4-day-old sprouts were manually collected and immediately used for the test (fresh sprouts) or were stored in polypropylene boxes at 4°C for 7 days (stored sprouts).

Assessment of probiotic production efficiency

Assessment of sprouting efficiency

The seed germination percentage was calculated using the following formula:

Biomass accumulation

Sprout biomass accumulation was expressed as the mass of 10 sprouts. For each variant of sprouting, at least 100 sprouts were weighted [24]

Counting of Lb. plantarum 299V viable cells

Once sprouting was completed, the samples were collected and the total number of lactic bacteria cells was determined. To this end, 1 g of the sprouts was gently homogenized with 9 mL of Ringer’s solution and shaken for 10 min (60 rpm). Then, serial decimal dilutions of the sprout samples were done and 0.1 mL aliquots were placed on MRS agar in triplicates and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 h. The characteristic colonies were counted and their numbers were calculated as CFU/g of the fresh weight of sprouts.

Efficiency factor

To sum up the final effect of the protocol proposed for the probiotic-rich sprouts, the efficiency factor was calculated [23]:

Microbiological quality

The following microbiological analyses were performed in accordance with Polish or European standards.

Total mesophilic bacteria

The total number of mesophilic bacteria was determined with the plate technique on nutrient agar according to PN-EN ISO 4833–2:2013 [25].

Lactic acid bacteria

The number of lactic acid bacteria was determined with the plate technique on MRS agar according to PN-ISO 15214:2002 [26].

Molds and yeasts

The number of yeasts and molds was determined with the plate technique on agar with glucose, yeast extract, and chloramphenicol according to PN-ISO 21527–1:2009 [27]. Yeast and molds were differentiated according to the morphology of colonies.

Coliforms

Coliforms were determined with the plate method on VRBL medium according to PN-ISO 4832:2007 [28]. The number of enterococci was determined with the plate method on Slanetz-Bartley agar according to PN-A-86034-10:1993 [29]. The number of S. aureus was determined using the Baird-Parker plate method according to PN-EN ISO 6888–1:2001 [30]. A confirmatory test was used to detect coagulase activity (Bactident Coagulase Test). The number of B. cereus was determined with the plate method on MYP medium according to PN-EN ISO 7932:2005 [31]; typical colonies were subjected to confirmatory tests. The presence of L. monocytogenes was determined by preincubation in half-Fraser broth, selective propagation in Fraser broth, and selection and identification of colonies on Palcam and Oxford media according to PN-EN ISO 11290–1:2017 [32]. In order to confirm the presence of these microorganisms, biochemical tests were performed using a Microbact Biochemical Identification Kit-Listeria Identification Kit 12L (Oxoid Ltd.). . The presence of Salmonella spp. was tested by preincubation in peptone-buffered water, selective propagation in Rappaport-Vasiliadis medium, and isolation and identification of colonies on BGA and XLD agars according to PN-EN ISO 6579–1:2017 [33]. Questionable colonies were subjected to RapID One System (Remel Europe Ltd.) biochemical tests. The presence of Y. enterocolitica was determined by broth multiplication PSB and identification of colonies on CIN medium according to PN-EN ISO 10273:2017 [34]. In order to confirm their presence, biochemical tests using Rapid One System (Remel Europe Ltd.) were performed.

Antimicrobial properties of Lb. plantarum against selected foodborne pathogens

The Lb. plantarum 299V strains were described for antagonistic activity using the well diffusion method. Sterile Petri dishes were poured with nutrient agar and inoculated with the culture of each indicator strain separately (concentration 6 log CFU/mL) to obtain the growth in the form of turf. For the study, common food-borne pathogens (E. coli, S. aureus, B. cereus, S. enterica sv. Enteritidis, S. enterica sv. Anatum, and L. monocytogenes) isolated from unprocessed food of plant origin were used. After solidification, wells with a 9.0-mm diameter were cut out and filled with 100 μL of the cultures of Lb. plantarum. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and the diameters of growth inhibition zones were measured. Antimicrobial activity (x) was calculated as follows: x = D − d, where D is the inhibition zone diameter and d is the well diameter. Antimicrobial activity (x) was characterized and classified based on the inhibition growth zone diameters and described as low (x < 4 mm diameter), medium (x = 4–8 mm), high (x = 8–12 mm), and very high (x > 12 mm) [11].

In vitro digestion

In vitro digestion was performed as described previously [35]. For simulated mastication and gastrointestinal digestion, 2 g of fresh sprouts were homogenized in 1.0 mL PBS buffer and 1 mL of simulated salivary fluid [15.1 mmol/L KCl, 3.7 mmol/L KH2PO4, 13.6 mmol/L NaHCO3, 0.15 mmol/L MgCl2 (H2O)6, 0.06 mmol/L (NH4)2CO3, 1.5 mmol/L CaCl2, and α-amylase (75 U/mL)], and shaken for 10 min at 37°C. Next, the samples were adjusted to pH 3 with 6 M HCl, suspended in 4 mL of simulated gastric fluid [6.9 mmol/L KCl, 0.9 mmol/L KH2PO4, 25 mmol/L NaHCO3, 47.2 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.1 mmol/L MgCl2 (H2O)6, 0.5 mol/L (NH4)2CO3, 0.15 mmol/L CaCl2, and pepsin (2,000 U/mL)] and shaken for 120 min at 37°C. After simulated gastric digestion, the samples were adjusted to pH 7 with 1 M NaOH and suspended in 8 mL of simulated intestinal fluid [6.8 mmol/L KCl, 0.8 mmol/L KH2PO4, 85 mmol/L NaHCO3, 38.4 mmol/L NaCl, 0.33 mmol/L MgCl2 (H2O)6, 0.15 mmol/L CaCl2, 10 mmol/L bile extract, and pancreatin (2,000 U/ mL)]. The prepared samples underwent in vitro intestinal digestion for 120 min. Then, serial decimal dilutions of the digest were done in Ringer`s solution and 0.1 ml of aliquots were spread on the MRS agar plate using a glass cell spreader. The plates were incubated aerobically at 30°C for 48 h. Characteristic colonies were counted and their numbers were calculated as CFU/g of fresh weight of the sprouts.

Statistics

All experimental results are mean ± S.D. of three parallel experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test were used to compare the groups (STATISTICA 13, StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, USA). Differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Results and discussion

This study evaluated legume sprouts as carriers for Lb. plantarum. In the first step, screening studies were performed to define optimal conditions for subsequent growth of sprouts and probiotics (Table 1).
Table 1

Effect of sprouting temperature and inoculation methods on biomass accumulation, sprouting efficiency, and Lb. plantarum growth/survival.

Cultivation conditionsSprouts
LentilSoybeanAdzuki beanMung bean
Massof 10 sprouts[g]C251.31±0.03a2.53±0.11a1.47±0.09ab1.41±0.12b
C301.43±0.09ab2.51±0.22a1.57±0.07b1.45±0.11b
C351.29±0.10ab2.31±0.35a1.46±0.02ab1.35±0.10b
P25S1.52±0.04c2.54±0.12a1.54±0.07bc1.42±0.10b
P25W1.56±0.04c2.56±0.12a1.62±0.07c1.46±0.10b
P30S1.52±0.06c2.47±0.11a1.57±0.10abc1.26±0.05ab
P30W1.56±0.04c2.42±0.09a1.57±0.03c1.19±0.03a
P35S1.43±0.23abc2.56±0.18a1.46±0.16abc1.29±0.15ab
P35W1.45±0.10abc2.55±0.15a1.61±0.14abc1.29±0.07b
Sproutingefficiency[%]C2586.9±6.4cd79.8±3.2c88.8±2.2ab94.0±1.6b
C3077.4±4.9c78.2±3.2c86.3±4.1a94.7±1.6b
C359.28±1.2a69.2±7.7b85.3±2.1a89.6±6.8ab
P25S83.5±2.5c74.3±4.4bc90.6±2.2ab94.7±0.2b
P25W83.5±3.3c74.3±5.3bc90.6±2.1ab94.7±0.9b
P30S81.8±0.8c80.5±1.3c93.2±1.6b94.9±0.5b
P30W89.3±0.5d74.7±2.1b89.2±1.2ab94.7±4.6b
P35S8.37±1.3a56.0±3.5a85.3±2.7a83.3±0.5a
P35W18.6±4.3b69.3±2.9b87.4±2.2a84.5±2.7a
Number of LAB[log10 CFU/ g f.m.]C250000
C300000
C350000
SDs-S6.50c6.74b6.87b6.67c
SDs-W4.92a5.22a5.17a5.59a
P25S7.64f8.16e7.86d8.05g
P25W5.38a6.69b5.42a6.74c
P30S7.40e7.57d7.53c8.15e
P30W6.00b5.56a5.20a7.12d
P35S7.31d7.28c6.90b7.70f
P35W6.43c5.98a4.00a6.14b

Means (± SD) in the columns followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05).

SDs- seeds; C- control; P- sprouts enriched with Lb. plantarum; S- sprouts obtained by soaking the seeds in the probiotic; W- sprouts obtained by watering 1-day-old sprouts with the probiotic. 25, 30, 35- temperature of sprouting: 25°C, 30°C and 35°C, respectively. LAB–lactic acid bacteria; CFU–colony forming unit, f.m.–fresh mass.

Means (± SD) in the columns followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05). SDs- seeds; C- control; P- sprouts enriched with Lb. plantarum; S- sprouts obtained by soaking the seeds in the probiotic; W- sprouts obtained by watering 1-day-old sprouts with the probiotic. 25, 30, 35- temperature of sprouting: 25°C, 30°C and 35°C, respectively. LAB–lactic acid bacteria; CFU–colony forming unit, f.m.–fresh mass. Generally, the beans (adzuki and mung) sprouted and grew effectively in the studied temperature range. The differences in the growth rate observed between the cultures did not exceed 5%. Most importantly, a significant reduction of the sprouting efficiency was observed at 35°C in the case of lentil and soybean. The largest count of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was noted in the sprouts obtained at 25°C from seeds imbibed in the water suspension of Lb. plantarum. The LAB in the lentil, soybean, adzuki bean, and mung bean were 7.64, 8.16, 7.86, and 8.05 log10 CFU g−1 f.m., respectively (Table 1). The results of the germination rate, biomass accumulation, and the number of LAB were combined and efficiency factors were proposed (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Effect of sprouting conditions and inoculation methods on the efficiency of production of probiotic-rich sprouts.

S- sprouts obtained by soaking the seeds in the probiotic; W- sprouts obtained by watering 1-day-old sprouts with the probiotic. 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C- temperature of sprouting. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05).

Effect of sprouting conditions and inoculation methods on the efficiency of production of probiotic-rich sprouts.

S- sprouts obtained by soaking the seeds in the probiotic; W- sprouts obtained by watering 1-day-old sprouts with the probiotic. 25°C, 30°C, and 35°C- temperature of sprouting. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05). This helped in determination of the conditions that are optimal for probiotic growth (survival) and sprout development. The best conditions for production of probiotic-rich sprouts, regardless of the type of legumes, were the same. The highest values of the efficiency factor were 2.43 × 109, 4.18 × 109, 4.28 × 109, and 8.12 × 109 for the preparations based on lentil, soybean, adzuki bean, and mung bean obtained at 25°C from seeds soaked in the Lb. plantarum water suspension, respectively (Fig 1). Following these results, preparations characterized by the highest value of the efficiency factor were selected for further detailed investigations to assess their microbiological quality and survival of the probiotic during in vitro digestion. So far, legume sprouts were used as carriers for Lb. rhamnosus GG [23]. It was found that soybean sprouts inoculated by soaking the seeds in a water suspension of the bacteria were the best carrier. Similar to this study, inoculation with the imbibition step was more effective than spraying the 1-day-old sprouts. It may be suggested that bacteria absorbed into the seeds during soaking have access to higher amounts of nutrients necessary for their development and are protected against physical conditions, e.g., oxygen or drying (water activity). The germination temperature, inoculation methods, and legume species strongly influenced the efficiency of the production of probiotic-rich sprouts; a decrease in the sprouting efficiency was also observed in the case of soybean and lentil sprouting at 35°C. Intensive mobilization of storage materials and loosening of the seed structure [16] usually create favorable conditions for development of microbiota; thus, inhibition of sprouting observed at higher temperatures may limit probiotic growth and promote growth of pathogens and yeast able to utilize starch [36]. The results of the effect of Lb. plantarum on the microbiological quality of the control and probiotic-rich sprouts are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Effect of Lb. plantarum on the microbiological quality of the control and probiotic-rich sprouts.

Count ofmicroorganisms[log10 CFU/ g f.m.]LentilSoybean
FreshStoredFreshStored
CPCPCPCP
Total mesophilic bacteria8.71a7.74a9.91c8.79b8.77a9.12a9.63b9.50b
Lactic bacteria2.81a7.61c4.71b8.45d7.45a9.06b7.76a9.29b
Molds2.85a2.60an.d.1.91an.d.n.d.0.70n.d.
Yeastsn.d.2.54an.d.2.69an.d.1.70an.d.1.70a
Coliformsn.d.n.d.6.14a6.06an.d.n.d.8.46b6.81a
Enterococcin.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.2.24a2.70b2.30an.d.
Staphylococcus aureusn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Bacillus cereus2.00b1.70a2.12bn.d.2.73an.d.3.18an.d.
Listeria monocytogenesn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Salmonella spp.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Yersinia enterocolitican.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Count ofmicroorganisms[log10 CFU/ g f.m.]Adzuki beanMung bean
FreshStoredFreshStored
CPCPCPCP
Total mesophilic bacteria9.00b8.43a10.48d10.13c8.70a8.78a9.86b9.90b
Lactic bacteria2.61a8.53c3.83b9.68d5.97a8.46b5.42a8.72b
Moldsn.d.n.d.1.70a2.09bn.d.1.70an.d.1.70a
Yeastsn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Coliformsn.d.n.d.6.80a7.24bn.d.n.d.7.72b5.93a
Enterococcin.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.3.16c3.00b2.88bc2.18a
Staphylococcus aureusn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Bacillus cereusn.d.1.70n.d.n.d.2.18an.d.2.00an.d.
Listeria monocytogenesn.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Salmonella spp.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Yersinia enterocolitican.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.

Means in the rows (for the selected plants) followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05).

C- control; P- sprouts enriched with Lb. plantarum; CFU–colony forming unit. f.m.–fresh mass. n.d.- not detected.

Means in the rows (for the selected plants) followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05). C- control; P- sprouts enriched with Lb. plantarum; CFU–colony forming unit. f.m.–fresh mass. n.d.- not detected. Compared to the control sprouts, the lentil sprouts enriched with the probiotic were characterized by lower mesophilic bacterial counts (by about 89% and 92% in fresh and stored samples, respectively). Similar behavior was also observed in the fresh and stored probiotic-rich adzuki bean sprouts, stored soybean sprouts enriched with the probiotic, and fresh probiotic-rich mung bean sprouts. Only in the case of the fresh soybean and stored mung bean sprouts enriched with Lb. plantarum, the total count of mesophilic bacteria was higher than in the control counterparts. The lactic acid bacterial count was increased during storage of both the control and enriched sprouts in the all studied samples. In the control sprouts, their content did not exceed 1% of total microorganisms (except soybean sprouts). Most importantly, in the case of fresh and stored probiotic-rich soybean sprouts, LAB accounted for 86% of the total microorganisms. Similar growth was also observed in the preparations based on the lentil, adzuki, and mung bean sprouts. In all the studied samples, the numbers of yeast and molds were low or they were not detected. Coliforms were not present in the fresh samples but were detected after storage. No pathogenic Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., or Y. enterocolitica were found in any of the analyzed samples. Only in the case of the fresh and stored control soybean sprouts was there some evidence of the presence of Listeria grayi. Furthermore, S. aureus was not detected in the studied sprouts. Some incidental contamination with Bacillus cereus was also observed, especially in the fresh and stored control soybean sprouts. The amount of aerobic mesophilic bacteria determined in the study was comparable with the results shown by Abadias, Usall, Anguera, Solsona, & Viñas [37]. In this study, sprouts were analyzed in 2005–2006. The bacterial count ranged between 7 and 8 log CFU/g in about 60% of the samples and was higher than 8 log CFU/g in 40%. On the other hand, the total microbial counts determined for lentils and mung sprouts obtained in an automatic sprouting system by Pao, Khalid, & Kalantari [38] were lower, i.e. 7.5 and 6.9 log CFU/g, respectively. There were smaller numbers of yeasts and molds than the count of bacteria, but in this study their amount was significantly lower than those detected (5.2 log CFU/g) in 15 different sprouts samples [37]. The concentrations of presumptive B. cereus in the lentil and mung bean sprouts detected in this study was comparable with those reported in the study by Pao et al. [38]. Similar to the other studies, the sprouts in this study were free from pathogenic microorganisms, e.g., L. monocytogenes or Y. enterocolitica [39], [40]. Generally, the microbiota of sprouted food is mainly influenced by organisms originally present inside and on seeds used for germination [41]. Seeds are usually disinfected but reduction in epiphytic microflora may result in an increase in the potential growth of pathogens [19]. In this study, Lb. plantarum replaced the natural microflora of sprouts and thus reduced the growth of the bacteria. Lactic acid bacteria naturally occur in sprouts but their count is usually less than 5 log CFU/g [37]. As observed in this study, the LAB count in the sprouts enriched with the probiotic ranged from 7.61 log CFU/g to 9.68 log CFU/g. Most importantly, an increase in LAB during storage was observed, which may suggest that sprouts provide important nutrients (free sugars and amino acids) [42], and sufficient water in the matrix [43]. A key role in this phenomenon is probably played by ecological competition. On the other hand antagonistic action of Lb. plantarum is well described and involves also production of bacteriocins and hydrogen peroxide [11]. To support this hypothesis, the antagonistic properties of Lb. plantarum 299V were determined against food-borne pathogens isolated from low-processed food (Fig 2).
Fig 2

Antagonistic effect of Lb. plantarum against selected food-borne pathogens isolated from low-processed food.

Means followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05).

Antagonistic effect of Lb. plantarum against selected food-borne pathogens isolated from low-processed food.

Means followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05). Lb. plantarum 299V showed high antagonistic activity toward L. monocytogenes and B. cereus strains; they were also able to reduce the growth of studied E. coli and Salmonella spp. The studied strain was less effective toward S. aureus. The potential of Lb. plantarum to prevent spoilage of dairy products, fresh fruits, and vegetables was previously reported by Ołdak et al. [11] and Trias, Bañeras, Montesinos, & Badosa [44]. The antagonistic effect of LAB against L. monocytogenes in sprout cultivation was studied by Palmai & Buchanan [36]. When Lactococcus lactis was coinoculated onto seeds at the beginning of the sprouting process, the maximum levels of L. monocytogenes were approximately 1 log lower than those observed in the control cultures. The probiotic Lb. plantarum 299V strain is able to grow effectively in legume sprouts, which also ensures their high microbiological quality. To check if such formulations meet the requirements set for probiotics, bacterial survival during simulated in vitro digestion was studied (Fig 3).
Fig 3

Survival of lactic bacteria during in vitro digestion.

Means followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05).

Survival of lactic bacteria during in vitro digestion.

Means followed by different letters are significantly different (n = 9; p≤ 0.05). The results showed a percent change in the probiotic count in the fluids after the process. The best protective properties were exhibited by the lentil sprouts, where the reduction of the initial population of LAB in the fresh and stored sprouts did not exceed 10%. A similar observation was found for the fresh soybean and mung bean sprouts; however, in the stored probiotic-rich sprouts, there was a decrease up to about 50% in the mung bean sprouts. In the case of the preparations based on adzuki bean, except for the high initial count of LAB, their content in the fluids after digestion was significantly decreased, i.e. by 63% and 54% in the fresh and stored probiotic-rich sprouts, respectively. Many different alternative matrices have been studied as probiotic carriers but only some studies determined the effect of the digestive tract conditions on the final probiotic count. Generally, Lb. plantarum is resistant to mucin, low gastric pH, and bile salts [3]. In the study of Emser et al. [6], after a quick digestion of apple cubes dehydrated in a sucrose solution there was a slight decrease in Lb. plantarum, with log reductions below 1 log unit. The results obtained in this study for the lentil-based preparations are comparable with those obtained for microencapsulated Lb. plantarum, where a cell reduction of about 1 log unit was observed after digestion [45]. It is suggested that legume sugars are able to make niches that limit harmful conditions and/or free sugars change the osmotic potential locally, as reported previously [45].

Conclusions

In conclusion, legume sprouts and Lb. plantarum 299V can be successfully combined to form a new probiotic-rich food. The key factors influencing the production of probiotic-rich sprouts include the temperature of sprouting (25°C) and methods of inoculation (soaking seeds in a water suspension of probiotics). Most importantly, Lb. plantarum 299V significantly improved the microbiological quality of sprouts, replacing natural endophytes with lactic bacteria. The population of Lb. plantarum 299V was also stable during cold storage. The high count of lactic bacteria observed in the digest confirmed the fact that studied sprouts are effective carriers for probiotics and ensure their survival in harmful conditions of the digestive tract. Enrichment of legume sprouts with probiotics is a successful attempt and yields products for a new branch of functional foods.
  25 in total

1.  Microbial profiles of on-line--procured sprouting seeds and potential hazards associated with enterotoxigenic Bacillus spp. in homegrown sprouts.

Authors:  S Pao; M F Khalid; A Kalantari
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.077

2.  Microbiological quality of selected ready-to-eat leaf vegetables, sprouts and non-pasteurized fresh fruit-vegetable juices including the presence of Cronobacter spp.

Authors:  Anna Berthold-Pluta; Monika Garbowska; Ilona Stefańska; Antoni Pluta
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 5.516

3.  Validation of EN ISO 6579-1 - Microbiology of the food chain - Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella - Part 1 detection of Salmonella spp.

Authors:  Kirsten A Mooijman; Annemarie Pielaat; Angelina F A Kuijpers
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Effect of ascorbic acid postharvest treatment on enzymatic browning, phenolics and antioxidant capacity of stored mung bean sprouts.

Authors:  Małgorzata Sikora; Michał Świeca
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 7.514

5.  In vitro effects of selected synbiotics on the human faecal microbiota composition.

Authors:  Delphine M A Saulnier; Glenn R Gibson; Sofia Kolida
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 4.194

6.  Bioprotection of Golden Delicious apples and Iceberg lettuce against foodborne bacterial pathogens by lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Rosalia Trias; Lluís Bañeras; Esther Badosa; Emilio Montesinos
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Nutritional and Antioxidant Potential of Lentil Sprouts Affected by Elicitation with Temperature Stress.

Authors:  Michał Świeca; Barbara Baraniak
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  The effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on the bacterial composition and metabolic activity in faeces of healthy volunteers: a placebo-controlled study on the onset and duration of effects.

Authors:  D Goossens; D Jonkers; M Russel; E Stobberingh; A Van Den Bogaard; R StockbrUgger
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 9.  Effects of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics on Human Health.

Authors:  Paulina Markowiak; Katarzyna Śliżewska
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains Isolated from Two Different Kinds of Regional Cheeses from Poland: Oscypek and Korycinski Cheese.

Authors:  Aleksandra Ołdak; Dorota Zielińska; Anna Rzepkowska; Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  6 in total

1.  Potentially Bioaccessible Phenolics from Mung Bean and Adzuki Bean Sprouts Enriched with Probiotic-Antioxidant Properties and Effect on the Motility and Survival of AGS Human Gastric Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Michał Świeca; Anna Herok; Katarzyna Piwowarczyk; Małgorzata Sikora; Patryk Ostanek; Urszula Gawlik-Dziki; Ireneusz Kapusta; Jarosław Czyż
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  Development of a Dairy-Free Fermented Oat-Based Beverage With Enhanced Probiotic and Bioactive Properties.

Authors:  Liwei Chen; Daoyan Wu; Joergen Schlundt; Patricia L Conway
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  In Vitro Bile Salt Hydrolase (BSH) Activity Screening of Different Probiotic Microorganisms.

Authors:  Jimmy G Hernández-Gómez; Argelia López-Bonilla; Gabriela Trejo-Tapia; Sandra V Ávila-Reyes; Antonio R Jiménez-Aparicio; Humberto Hernández-Sánchez
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-22

4.  Potentially Bioaccessible Phenolic and Antioxidant Potential of Fresh and Stored Lentil Sprouts-Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v Enrichment.

Authors:  Urszula Gawlik-Dziki; Barbara Baraniak; Małgorzata Sikora; Anna Jakubczyk; Ireneusz Kapusta; Michał Świeca
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Effect of the Addition of Buckwheat Sprouts Modified with the Addition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii to an Atherogenic Diet on the Metabolism of Sterols, Stanols and Fatty Acids in Rats.

Authors:  Marta Molska; Julita Reguła; Anna Grygier; Agata Muzsik-Kazimierska; Magdalena Rudzińska; Anna Gramza-Michałowska
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Analysis of Biofilm Formation on the Surface of Organic Mung Bean Seeds, Sprouts and in the Germination Environment.

Authors:  Marcin Kruk; Monika Trząskowska
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.