Literature DB >> 30461668

Pediatric Transport Triage: Development and Assessment of an Objective Tool to Guide Transport Planning.

Katherine M Steffen1, Corina Noje2,3, Philomena M Costabile3,4, Eric Henderson3,5, Elizabeth A Hunt2,6, Bruce L Klein3,6, Kristen Nelson McMillan2,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We developed a Pediatric Transport Triage Tool (PT3) to objectively guide selection of team composition and transport mode, thereby standardizing transport planning. Previously, modified Pediatric Early Warning Score for transport has been used to assess illness severity but not to guide transport decision making.
METHODS: The PT3 was created for pediatric transport by combining objective evaluations of neurologic, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems with a systems-based medical condition list to identify diagnoses requiring expedited transport and/or advanced team composition not captured by neurologic, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems alone. A scoring algorithm was developed to guide transport planning. Transport data (mode, team composition, time to dispatch, patient disposition, and complications) were collected before and after PT3 implementation at a single tertiary care center over an 18-month period.
RESULTS: We reviewed 2237 inbound pediatric transports. Transport mode, patient disposition, and dispatch time were unchanged over the study period. Fewer calls using a transport nurse were noted after PT3 implementation (33.9% vs 30%, P = 0.05), with a trend toward fewer rotor-wing transports and transports requiring physicians. The majority of users, regardless of experience level, reported improved transport standardization with the tool. Need to upgrade team composition or mode during transport was not different during the study period. No adverse patient safety events occurred with PT3 use.
CONCLUSIONS: The PT3 represents an objective triage tool to reduce variability in transport planning. The PT3 decreased resource utilization and was not associated with adverse outcomes. Teams with dynamic staffing models, various experience levels, and multiple transport modes may benefit from this standardized assessment tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30461668      PMCID: PMC6526089          DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  32 in total

1.  Excess morbidity associated with interhospital transport.

Authors:  R K Kanter; N M Boeing; W P Hannan; D L Kanter
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  National survey of neonatal transport teams in the United States.

Authors:  Kristine A Karlsen; Michael Trautman; Webra Price-Douglas; Sandra Smith
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Use of a physiologic scoring system during interhospital transport of pediatric patients.

Authors:  B Gunnarsson; C M Heard; A T Rotta; A M Heard; B H Kourkounis; J E Fletcher
Journal:  Air Med J       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

4.  Quality Metrics in Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transport: A National Delphi Project.

Authors:  Hamilton P Schwartz; Michael T Bigham; Pamela J Schoettker; Keith Meyer; Michael S Trautman; Robert M Insoft
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Measurement of pediatric illness severity using simple pretransport variables.

Authors:  R A Orr; S T Venkataraman; K A McCloskey; J E Janosky; M Dragotta; D Bills; W D King
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Evaluation of a simplified therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS-28) and the modified early warning score (MEWS) in predicting physiological deterioration during inter-facility transport.

Authors:  Larry L Y Lee; K L Yeung; Wendy Y L Lo; Yvonne S C Lau; Simon Y H Tang; Jimmy T S Chan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Pretransport Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score underestimates the requirement for intensive care or major interventions during interhospital transport.

Authors:  R A Orr; S T Venkataraman; M I Cinoman; B L Hogue; C A Singleton; K A McCloskey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Impact of a preventive programme on the occurrence of incidents during the transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  M Bérubé; F Bernard; H Marion; J Parent; M Thibault; D R Williamson; M Albert
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.072

9.  The use of a modified pediatric early warning score to assess stability of pediatric patients during transport.

Authors:  Toni Petrillo-Albarano; Jana Stockwell; Traci Leong; Kiran Hebbar
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.454

10.  Morbidity and severity of illness during interhospital transfer: impact of a specialised paediatric retrieval team.

Authors:  J Britto; S Nadel; I Maconochie; M Levin; P Habibi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristics of Medically Transported Critically Ill Children with Respiratory Failure in Latin America: Implications for Outcomes.

Authors:  Jesus A Serra; Franco Díaz; Pablo Cruces; Cristobal Carvajal; Maria J Nuñez; A Donoso; J A Bravo-Serrano; M Carbonell; C Courtie; A Fernández; L Martínez-Arroyo; J Martínez; S Menta; Luis Pedrozo-Ortiz; A Wegner; Nicolas Monteverde-Fernández; Juan C Jaramillo-Bustamante; Roberto Jabornisky; Sebastián González-Dambrauskas; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Pablo Vásquez-Hoyos
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2021-05-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.