Mark A Lumley1, Howard Schubiner. 1. From the Department of Psychology (Lumley), Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; and Department of Internal Medicine (Schubiner), Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Ascension Health, and Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Southfield, Michigan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is a significant health problem that is increasing in prevalence, and advances in treatment are needed. METHODS: We briefly review the leading evidence-based psychological therapies for chronic pain-cognitive-behavioral and acceptance/mindfulness-based therapies-and examine several limitations and missing perspectives of these approaches. We review six lesser-known interventions that address these limitations, and we describe our integrative model for psychological assessment and treatment of centralized pain. We present a typical patient and describe how we apply this approach, along with challenges to its implementation and possible solutions to these challenges. RESULTS: Greater pain treatment efficacy may be possible if clinicians: (a) distinguish patients with primarily centralized (i.e., somatoform or nociplastic) pain from those with primarily peripheral (nociceptive, inflammatory, or neuropathic) pain; (b) acknowledge the capacity of the brain not only to modulate pain but also generate as well as attenuate or eliminate centralized pain; (c) consider the powerful role that adverse life experiences and psychological conflicts play in centralized pain; and (d) integrate emotional processing and interpersonal changes into treatment. Our integrative treatment involves delivering a progression of interventions, as needed, to achieve pain reduction: tailored pain neuroscience education, cognitive and mindfulness skills to decrease the pain danger alarm mechanism, behavioral engagement in avoided painful and other feared activities, emotional awareness and expression to reverse emotional avoidance and overcome trauma or psychological conflict, and adaptive communication to decrease interpersonal stress. CONCLUSIONS: This integrative assessment and treatment model has the potential to substantially reduce and sometimes eliminate centralized pain by changing the cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and interpersonal processes that trigger and maintain centralized pain.
OBJECTIVE:Chronic pain is a significant health problem that is increasing in prevalence, and advances in treatment are needed. METHODS: We briefly review the leading evidence-based psychological therapies for chronic pain-cognitive-behavioral and acceptance/mindfulness-based therapies-and examine several limitations and missing perspectives of these approaches. We review six lesser-known interventions that address these limitations, and we describe our integrative model for psychological assessment and treatment of centralized pain. We present a typical patient and describe how we apply this approach, along with challenges to its implementation and possible solutions to these challenges. RESULTS: Greater pain treatment efficacy may be possible if clinicians: (a) distinguish patients with primarily centralized (i.e., somatoform or nociplastic) pain from those with primarily peripheral (nociceptive, inflammatory, or neuropathic) pain; (b) acknowledge the capacity of the brain not only to modulate pain but also generate as well as attenuate or eliminate centralized pain; (c) consider the powerful role that adverse life experiences and psychological conflicts play in centralized pain; and (d) integrate emotional processing and interpersonal changes into treatment. Our integrative treatment involves delivering a progression of interventions, as needed, to achieve pain reduction: tailored pain neuroscience education, cognitive and mindfulness skills to decrease the pain danger alarm mechanism, behavioral engagement in avoided painful and other feared activities, emotional awareness and expression to reverse emotional avoidance and overcome trauma or psychological conflict, and adaptive communication to decrease interpersonal stress. CONCLUSIONS: This integrative assessment and treatment model has the potential to substantially reduce and sometimes eliminate centralized pain by changing the cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and interpersonal processes that trigger and maintain centralized pain.
Authors: Tom G Mayer; Randy Neblett; Howard Cohen; Krista J Howard; Yun H Choi; Mark J Williams; Yoheli Perez; Robert J Gatchel Journal: Pain Pract Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Richard D Lane; Shari R Waldstein; Margaret A Chesney; J Richard Jennings; William R Lovallo; Peter J Kozel; Robert M Rose; Douglas A Drossman; Neil Schneiderman; Julian F Thayer; Oliver G Cameron Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Andrea L Nicol; Christine B Sieberg; Daniel J Clauw; Afton L Hassett; Stephanie E Moser; Chad M Brummett Journal: J Pain Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Amanda J Burger; Mark A Lumley; Jennifer N Carty; Deborah V Latsch; Elyse R Thakur; Maren E Hyde-Nolan; Alaa M Hijazi; Howard Schubiner Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Jo Nijs; Rafael Torres-Cueco; C Paul van Wilgen; Enrique Lluh Girbes; Filip Struyf; Nathalie Roussel; Jessica van Oosterwijck; Liesbeth Daenen; Kevin Kuppens; Luc Vanwerweeen; Linda Hermans; David Beckwee; Lennard Voogt; Jacqui Clark; Niamh Moloney; Mira Meeus Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.965