Literature DB >> 30461318

Does EEG activity during painful stimulation mirror more closely the noxious stimulus intensity or the subjective pain sensation?

Stefanie F Bunk1, Stefan Lautenbacher2, Jascha Rüsseler3, Karin Müller2, Jana Schultz2, Miriam Kunz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many researchers have tried to investigate pain by studying brain responses. One method used to investigate pain-related brain responses is continuous electroencephalography (EEG). The objective of the current study is to add on to our understanding of EEG responses during pain, by differentiation between EEG patterns indicative of (i) the noxious stimulus intensity and (ii) the subjective pain sensation.
METHODS: EEG was recorded during the administration of tonic experimental pain, consisting of six minutes of contact heat applied to the leg via a thermode. Two stimuli above pain threshold, one at pain threshold and two non-painful stimuli were administered. Thirty-six healthy participants provided a subjective pain rating during thermal stimulation. Relative EEG power was calculated for the frequency bands alpha1, alpha2, beta1, beta2, delta, and theta.
RESULTS: Whereas EEG activity could not be predicted by stimulus intensity (except in one frequency band), subjective pain sensation could significantly predict differences in EEG activity in several frequency bands. An increase in the subjective pain sensation was associated with a decrease in alpha2, beta1, beta2 as well as in theta activity across the midline electrodes.
CONCLUSION: The subjective experience of pain seems to capture unique variance in EEG activity above and beyond what is captured by noxious stimulus intensity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Experimental pain; tonic pain

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30461318     DOI: 10.1080/08990220.2018.1521790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  4 in total

1.  A Temporospatial Study of Sympathetic Skin Response and Electroencephalogram in Oral Mucosa Thermal Perception.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Shengjing Hu; Zhangang Wang; Xiang Li; Suogang Wang; Gang Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Relief of chronic pain associated with increase in midline frontal theta power.

Authors:  Nabi Rustamov; Elizabeth A Wilson; Alexandra E Fogarty; Lara W Crock; Eric C Leuthardt; Simon Haroutounian
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2022-10-10

3.  Distinct spatio-temporal and spectral brain patterns for different thermal stimuli perception.

Authors:  Zied Tayeb; Andrei Dragomir; Jin Ho Lee; Nida Itrat Abbasi; Emmanuel Dean; Aishwarya Bandla; Rohit Bose; Raghav Sundar; Anastasios Bezerianos; Nitish V Thakor; Gordon Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  EEG Recordings as Biomarkers of Pain Perception: Where Do We Stand and Where to Go?

Authors:  Panagiotis Zis; Andreas Liampas; Artemios Artemiadis; Gabriela Tsalamandris; Panagiota Neophytou; Zoe Unwin; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Georgios M Hadjigeorgiou; Giustino Varrassi; Yifan Zhao; Ptolemaios Georgios Sarrigiannis
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-03-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.