Literature DB >> 30461297

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Monocaprylin against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.

Jianyu Wang1,2,3, Maomao Ma1,2,4, Jun Yang1,2,4, Long Chen1,2,4, Ping Yu1,2,3, Jun Wang3, Deming Gong1,2,5, Shuguang Deng2,3,6, Xuefang Wen1,2,3, Zheling Zeng1,2,3.   

Abstract

In the present study, the antibacterial activity of monocaprylin in comparison with sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was assessed by measuring MIC, MBC, effect of pH on MIC, and incubation temperature on bactericidal efficacy. Results showed that monocaprylin exhibited an excellent antibacterial activity against both strains, with the lowest MIC and MBC of 1.28 mg/mL. A MIC of monocaprylin remained unchanged despite the pH values of culture medium, ranging from 5 to 9, unlike that of potassium sorbate or sodium benzoate. Furthermore, monocaprylin at MBC effectively reduced the population of E. coli and S. aureus by >5.5 log CFU/mL at 25°C within 6 h and decreased E. coli by approximately 5.0 log CFU/mL and S. aureus by 2.9 log CFU/mL at 12 h. The underlying mechanism of monocaprylin was then investigated by measuring β-galactosidase activity, membrane potential, release of cellular contents, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy observations. Results indicated that monocaprylin killed E. coli by the rapid change in permeability and integrity of cell membrane, leading to decline of membrane potential, leakage of nucleic acids and proteins, and ultimately cell membrane disintegration and lysis. On the other hand, monocaprylin might exert its antibacterial activity against S. aureus mainly by diffusing across the cell wall, collapsing the cell membrane, and disturbing the order of intracellular contents. These findings indicated that monocaprylin had better antibacterial ability compared with traditional synthetic preservatives and might be a potential antibacterial additive independent of pH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibacterial activity; Monocaprylin; Underlying mechanism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30461297     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  5 in total

1.  Octanoate Alleviates Dietary Soybean Oil-Induced Intestinal Physical Barrier Damage, Oxidative Stress, Inflammatory Response and Microbial Dysbiosis in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys Crocea).

Authors:  Zhou Zhang; Yuhang Tang; Wei Fang; Kun Cui; Dan Xu; Guobin Liu; Shuyan Chi; Beiping Tan; Kangsen Mai; Qinghui Ai
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Antibacterial activity and mechanism of sanguinarine against Providencia rettgeri in vitro.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Yansi Lyu; Jingkai Huang; Xiaodong Zhang; Na Yu; Ziping Wen; Si Chen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Vanillic Acid against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacter cloacae.

Authors:  Weidong Qian; Yuting Fu; Miao Liu; Ting Wang; Jianing Zhang; Min Yang; Zhaohuan Sun; Xiang Li; Yongdong Li
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-13

4.  Generating new mixtures of food additives with antimicrobial and cytotoxic potency against Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Samy Selim; Mohammed S Almuhayawi; Mohammed H Alruhaili; Shadi A Zakai; Mona Warrad
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Antibacterial Mode of Eucommia ulmoides Male Flower Extract Against Staphylococcus aureus and Its Application as a Natural Preservative in Cooked Beef.

Authors:  Min Xing; Shun Liu; Yaping Yu; Ling Guo; Yao Wang; Yage Feng; Peng Fei; Huaibing Kang; Md Aslam Ali
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.