| Literature DB >> 30461297 |
Jianyu Wang1,2,3, Maomao Ma1,2,4, Jun Yang1,2,4, Long Chen1,2,4, Ping Yu1,2,3, Jun Wang3, Deming Gong1,2,5, Shuguang Deng2,3,6, Xuefang Wen1,2,3, Zheling Zeng1,2,3.
Abstract
In the present study, the antibacterial activity of monocaprylin in comparison with sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was assessed by measuring MIC, MBC, effect of pH on MIC, and incubation temperature on bactericidal efficacy. Results showed that monocaprylin exhibited an excellent antibacterial activity against both strains, with the lowest MIC and MBC of 1.28 mg/mL. A MIC of monocaprylin remained unchanged despite the pH values of culture medium, ranging from 5 to 9, unlike that of potassium sorbate or sodium benzoate. Furthermore, monocaprylin at MBC effectively reduced the population of E. coli and S. aureus by >5.5 log CFU/mL at 25°C within 6 h and decreased E. coli by approximately 5.0 log CFU/mL and S. aureus by 2.9 log CFU/mL at 12 h. The underlying mechanism of monocaprylin was then investigated by measuring β-galactosidase activity, membrane potential, release of cellular contents, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy observations. Results indicated that monocaprylin killed E. coli by the rapid change in permeability and integrity of cell membrane, leading to decline of membrane potential, leakage of nucleic acids and proteins, and ultimately cell membrane disintegration and lysis. On the other hand, monocaprylin might exert its antibacterial activity against S. aureus mainly by diffusing across the cell wall, collapsing the cell membrane, and disturbing the order of intracellular contents. These findings indicated that monocaprylin had better antibacterial ability compared with traditional synthetic preservatives and might be a potential antibacterial additive independent of pH.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Monocaprylin; Underlying mechanism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30461297 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Prot ISSN: 0362-028X Impact factor: 2.077