Literature DB >> 30461056

Improving collaboration in the implementation of global biodiversity conventions.

Katharina Rogalla von Bieberstein1, Elsa Sattout2, Mads Christensen1, Balakrishna Pisupati3, Neil D Burgess1,4,5, Jerry Harrison1, Jonas Geldmann5.   

Abstract

Eight conventions make up the biodiversity cluster of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) that provide the critical international legal framework for the conservation and sustainable use of nature. However, concerns about the rate of implementation of the conventions at the national level have triggered discussions about the effectiveness of these MEAs in halting the loss of biodiversity. Two main concerns have emerged: lack of capacity and resources and lack of coherence in implementing multiple conventions. We focused on the latter and considered the mechanisms by which international conventions are translated into national policy. Specifically, we examined how the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the associated Aichi Biodiversity Targets have functioned as a unifying grand plan for biodiversity conservation. This strategic plan has been used to coordinate and align targets to promote and enable more effective implementation across all biodiversity-related conventions. Results of a survey of 139 key stakeholders from 88 countries suggests streamlining across ministries and agencies, improved coordination mechanisms with all relevant stakeholders, and better knowledge sharing between conventions could improve cooperation among biodiversity-related conventions. The roadmap for improving synergies among conventions agreed to at the 13th Convention on Biological Diversity's Conference of Parties in 2016 includes actions such as mechanisms to avoid duplication in national reporting and monitoring on conventions and capacity building related to information and knowledge sharing. We suggest the scientific community can actively engage and contribute to the policy process by establishing a science-policy platform to address knowledge gaps; improving data gathering, reporting, and monitoring; developing indicators that adequately support implementation of national plans and strategies; and providing evidence-based recommendations to policy makers. The latter will be particularly important as 2020 approaches and work to develop a new biodiversity agenda for the next decade is beginning.
© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  Aichi Targets; Convención sobre la Diversidad Biológica; Convention on Biological Diversity; Objetivos de Aichi; acuerdos ambientales multilaterales; estrategias nacionales para la biodiversidad; multilateral environmental agreements; national biodiversity action plan; national biodiversity strategies; plan de acción nacional para la biodiversidad; plan estratégico para la biodiversidad; policy; politics; políticas; reglamento; strategic plan for biodiversity; 国际生物多样性战略; 国际生物多样性行动计划; 多边环境协议; 政治; 政策; 爱知目标; 生物多样性公约; 生物多样性战略规划

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30461056     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  2 in total

1.  A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures.

Authors:  Jonas Geldmann; Andrea Manica; Neil D Burgess; Lauren Coad; Andrew Balmford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Five Steps to Inject Transformative Change into the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.

Authors:  R Edward Grumbine; Jianchu Xu
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 8.589

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.