Literature DB >> 30460996

Bioequivalence and Therapeutic Equivalence of Generic and Brand Bupropion in Adults With Major Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Evan D Kharasch1, Alicia Neiner2, Kristin Kraus2, Jane Blood2, Angela Stevens3, Julia Schweiger3, J Philip Miller4, Eric J Lenze3.   

Abstract

Controversy persists about bupropion XL 300 mg generic equivalence to brand product. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded crossover in 70 adults with major depression in stable remission taking any bupropion XL 300 mg tested bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence of available XL 300 mg products. After a 4-week lead-in on patients' existing bupropion, four 6-week phases evaluated brand and three generics. Patients were uninformed of switching. Drug overencapsulation ensured blinding. There were no differences between any generic and brand, or between generics, in peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 24-hour dosing interval (AUC0-24 ) for racemic bupropion or major metabolites. All generics met formal bioequivalence criteria for bupropion and metabolites. There were no differences between generics and brand, or between generics, in depression symptoms or side effects, assessed by every 3-week in-person interview and daily smartphone-based self-report. There were no differences in patients' perceptions of bupropion products. Results show three bupropion XL 300 mg generic products are both bioequivalent and not therapeutically different from brand drug and each other.
© 2018 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2018 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30460996      PMCID: PMC6465131          DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  34 in total

Review 1.  Switching from brand-name to generic psychotropic medications: a literature review.

Authors:  Julie Eve Desmarais; Linda Beauclair; Howard C Margolese
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 5.243

2.  The Two Main Goals of Bioequivalence Studies.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Henning H Blume; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Deficiencies of the FDA in evaluating generic formulations: addressing narrow therapeutic index drugs.

Authors:  Michelle Hottinger; Bryan A Liang
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2012

4.  Prevalence and Predictors of Generic Drug Skepticism Among Physicians: Results of a National Survey.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Joshua J Gagne; Wesley Eddings; Jessica M Franklin; Kathryn M Ross; Lisa A Fulchino; Eric G Campbell
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 1: ethical and scientific issues.

Authors:  R Temple; S S Ellenberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-09-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Review of maintenance trials for major depressive disorder: a 25-year perspective from the US Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Silvana Borges; Yeh-Fong Chen; Thomas P Laughren; Robert Temple; Hiren D Patel; Paul A David; Mitchell Mathis; Ellis Unger; Peiling Yang; Ni A Khin
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Development and validation of a high-throughput stereoselective LC-MS/MS assay for bupropion, hydroxybupropion, erythrohydrobupropion, and threohydrobupropion in human plasma.

Authors:  Aaron M Teitelbaum; Alicia M Flaker; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 8.  Generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of prospective and retrospective studies.

Authors:  Mikiko Yamada; Timothy E Welty
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change.

Authors:  S A Montgomery; M Asberg
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 10.  Bupropion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness as an antidepressant.

Authors:  Krisna Patel; Sophie Allen; Mariam N Haque; Ilinca Angelescu; David Baumeister; Derek K Tracy
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-02-18
View more
  4 in total

1.  Nicotine oxidation by genetic variants of CYP2B6 and in human brain microsomes.

Authors:  Adam Joseph Bloom; Pan-Fen Wang; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2019-03-11

2.  Bupropion XL and SR have similar effectiveness and adverse event profiles when used to treat smoking among patients at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Maher Karam-Hage; George Kypriotakis; Diane Beneventi; Janice A Blalock; Yong Cui; Roberto Gonzalez; Jean Tayar; Patrick Chaftari; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  When All Else Fails, Listen to the Patient: A Viewpoint on the Use of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Aaron M Mofsen; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Ginger E Nicol; Colin A Depp; J Philip Miller; Eric J Lenze
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2019-04-21

4.  Brand-Name Antidepressants Outperform Their Generic Counterparts in Preventing Hospitalization for Depression: The Real-World Evidence from Taiwan.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Hsu; Sheng-Yu Lee; Yao-Hsu Yang; Liang-Jen Wang
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.