Literature DB >> 30460781

Treatment of opioid dependence with buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablets: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

XuYi Wang1, Haifeng Jiang2, Min Zhao2, Jing Li3, Frank Gray4, Lixia Sheng5, Yi Li6, Xiaodong Li7, Walter Ling8, Wei Li9, Wei Hao1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablets for the treatment of opioid dependence in Chinese adults.
METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included four periods: induction (3-5 days), stabilization (7-21 days), randomization/treatment (6 weeks), and postmedication follow-up (1 week). A total of 442 participants with opioid dependence were enrolled; 260 were randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone or placebo. The primary outcome was retention in treatment, defined as the time from randomization to treatment completion or treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included maximum consecutive days of abstinence from opioids, self-reported craving and opioid withdrawal symptoms, and urine drug screen results. Safety assessments included adverse event reporting, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and prior/concomitant medications.
RESULTS: The median treatment retention time (95% confidence internal) with buprenorphine/naloxone was 32 days (26-38) versus 6 days (5-8) for placebo, with a Cox hazard ratio of 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.38; P < 0.0001). The median maximum consecutive days of abstinence (95% confidence interval) was: buprenorphine/naloxone, 21 days (26-38); placebo, 5 days (5-8) with a Cox hazard ratio of 0.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.60; P < 0.0001). Withdrawal and craving symptoms were significantly milder with buprenorphine/naloxone versus placebo (P < 0.001). Urine drug screen results indicated significantly lower opioid usage in the buprenorphine/naloxone group compared with placebo (P < 0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events in the buprenorphine/naloxone group during treatment were aspartate aminotransferase increased and nasopharyngitis. DISCUSSION: Efficacy and safety results from this clinical trial support a positive benefit-risk ratio for buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablet use in the treatment of an opioid-dependent Chinese population.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  People's Republic of China; buprenorphine-naloxone; opiate dependence; opiate substitution treatment; treatment efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30460781     DOI: 10.1111/appy.12344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac Psychiatry        ISSN: 1758-5864            Impact factor:   2.538


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Literature Review Examining Primary Outcomes of Medication Treatment Studies for Opioid Use Disorder: What Outcome Should Be Used to Measure Opioid Treatment Success?

Authors:  Breanne E Biondi; Xiaoying Zheng; Cynthia A Frank; Ismene Petrakis; Sandra A Springer
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 2.  Progress in agonist therapy for substance use disorders: Lessons learned from methadone and buprenorphine.

Authors:  Chloe J Jordan; Jianjing Cao; Amy Hauck Newman; Zheng-Xiong Xi
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 3.  Opioid agonist treatment for people who are dependent on pharmaceutical opioids.

Authors:  Suzanne Nielsen; Wai Chung Tse; Briony Larance
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-05

4.  Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Buprenorphine Tablets Following Single and Multiple Doses in Chinese Participants With and Without Opioid Use Disorder.

Authors:  Ruihua Dong; Hongyun Wang; Dandan Li; Liwei Lang; Frank Gray; Yongzhen Liu; Celine M Laffont; Malcolm Young; Ji Jiang; Zeyuan Liu; Susan M Learned
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2019-09

5.  Prevalence of Coaddictions and Rate of Successful Treatment Among a French Sample of Opioid-Dependent Patients With Long-Term Opioid Substitution Therapy: The OPAL Study.

Authors:  Marie Grall-Bronnec; Edouard-Jules Laforgue; Gaëlle Challet-Bouju; Jennyfer Cholet; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Juliette Leboucher; Morgane Guillou-Landréat; Caroline Victorri-Vigneau
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Relative effectiveness of medications for opioid-related disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jihoon Lim; Imen Farhat; Antonios Douros; Dimitra Panagiotoglou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.