| Literature DB >> 30460105 |
Bo Li1,2, Dan Wu1,3, Yingying Cai1, Monakhov Vladimir G4, Wei Zhang1,2, Yanchun Xu1,2.
Abstract
Genetic individualization based on non-invasive sampling is crucial for estimating the numbers of individuals in endangered mammalian populations. In sable (Martes zibellina)-poaching cases, identifying the number of animals involved is critical for determining the penalty. In addition, investigating animal numbers for wild sable populations requires genetic individualization when collecting several samples in neighboring regions. Microsatellites have been demonstrated to be reliable markers for individual identification. Thirty-three microsatellite loci derived from Mustelidae were selected to develop a genetic individualization method for sable. Three reference populations containing 54 unrelated sables were used to calculate allele number, allelic frequencies, and the polymorphic information content of each locus. The data were subsequently used to assess the validity of a combination of twelve loci for sable individualization. We defined twelve polymorphic loci that were easy to be amplified and genotyped. Four significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were observed among the 12 loci in the three populations. The match probability of an individual from the reference populations with a random individual based on the 12 loci was 1.37 × 10-13. Using the combination of the twelve loci provides sufficient power to individualize sables considering the levels of microsatellite polymorphism observed. These loci were successfully applied to a case of sable poaching and provided valid evidence to determine the penalty. The genetic individualization of sable based on these loci might also be useful to investigate the numbers of animals in wild populations.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic individualization; microsatellites; mustelidae; sable (Martes zibellina)
Year: 2018 PMID: 30460105 PMCID: PMC6138352 DOI: 10.1080/19768354.2018.1494039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Cells Syst (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-8354 Impact factor: 1.815
Characteristics of the twelve microsatellite loci in sable (N = 54).
| Locus | Repeat | Size range (bp) | PIC | PI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mf 1.11 | (TATC)n | 219–223 | 0.24 | 0.61 | 3 | 0.54 | 0.22 |
| Mf 1.18 | (ATCT)n | 158–174 | 0.28 | 0.59 | 5 | 0.52 | 0.24 |
| Mf 2.13 | (TATC)nATC(TATC) | 296–332 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 10 | 0.73 | 0.09 |
| Mf 3.7 | (TAGA)4(TGGG)(TGGA)(TAGA)n | 165–221 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 7 | 0.33 | 0.44 |
| Mf 4.10 | (GAAA)n | 276–328 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 13 | 0.82 | 0.04 |
| Mf 8.7 | (TCTA)n | 137–161 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 7 | 0.75 | 0.08 |
| Mf 8.8 | (CTTT)n | 230–274 | 0.61 | 0.90 | 12 | 0.88 | 0.02 |
| Ma 1 | (TG)4TA(TG)n | 224–248 | 0.63 | 0.88 | 12 | 0.86 | 0.03 |
| Ma 2 | (TG)n | 189–201 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 7 | 0.77 | 0.07 |
| Ma 15 | (TG)n | 220–230 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 5 | 0.40 | 0.36 |
| Mvi 354 | (CA)n | 212–232 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 11 | 0.82 | 0.04 |
| Mvi 2243 | (TG)4TA(TG)AG(TG)nCG(TG)4 | 169–191 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 12 | 0.86 | 0.03 |
Note: Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; Na, allele number; PIC, polymorphic information content; PI, probability of identical genotypes per locus.
Allelic frequencies for the total China and Russia population of sables (N = 54).
| Locus | Alleles and their frequencies (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mf 1.11 | 219 (52.78) | 223 (27.78) | 227 (19.44) | ||||
| Mf 1.18 | 158 (0.93) | 162 (57.41) | 166 (11.11) | 170 (27.78) | 174 (2.78) | ||
| Mf 2.13 | 296 (0.93) | 304 (25.93) | 308 (20.37) | 312 (34.26) | 315 (4.63) | 316 (6.48) | 320 (2.78) |
| 327 (0.93) | 328 (1.85) | 332 (1.85) | |||||
| Mf 3.7 | 165 (0.93) | 185 (11.11) | 189 (79.63) | 197 (4.63) | 201 (1.85) | 205 (0.93) | 221 (0.93) |
| Mf 4.10 | 276 (0.93) | 280 (33.33) | 284 (6.48) | 288 (9.26) | 292 (7.41) | 300 (5.56) | 304 (0.93) |
| 308 (3.70) | 312 (13.89) | 316 (0.93) | 320 (1.85) | 324 (8.33) | 328 (7.41) | ||
| Mf 8.7 | 137 (28.70) | 141 (15.74) | 145 (13.89) | 149 (28.70) | 153 (10.19) | 157 (0.93) | 161 (1.85) |
| Mf 8.8 | 230 (5.56) | 234 (8.33) | 238 (17.59) | 242 (11.11) | 246 (12.04) | 250 (10.19) | 254 (4.63) |
| 258 (11.11) | 262 (5.56) | 266 (11.11) | 270 (1.85) | 274 (0.93) | |||
| Ma 1 | 224 (2.78) | 226 (14.81) | 228 (11.11) | 230 (5.56) | 232 (3.70) | 234 (17.59) | 238 (18.52) |
| 240 (9.26) | 242 (2.78) | 244 (9.26) | 246 (1.85) | 248 (2.78) | |||
| Ma 2 | 189 (7.41) | 191 (22.22) | 193 (23.15) | 195 (28.70) | 197 (6.48) | 199 (9.26) | 201 (2.78) |
| Ma 15 | 220 (75.00) | 222 (8.33) | 224 (1.85) | 228 (6.48) | 230 (8.33) | ||
| Mvi 354 | 212 (2.78) | 214 (1.85) | 216 (5.56) | 218 (12.96) | 220 (4.63) | 222 (6.48) | 224 (12.96) |
| 226 (20.37) | 228 (26.85) | 230 (2.78) | 232 (2.78) | ||||
Fragment sizes of the twelve microsatellite loci and corresponding genotypes of the evidence samples.
| Locus | Observed allele size (bp) and corresponding genotype | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | |
| Mf 1.11 | 222.00/222.00 | 222.13/226.20 | 222.13/230.41 | 222.21/222.21 |
| Mf 1.18 | 161.83/161.83 | 161.92/161.92 | 161.83/161.83 | 161.92/165.93 |
| Mf 2.13 | 303.81/312.18 | 303.85/316.31 | 308.71/315.79 | 311.99/327.55 |
| Mf 3.7 | 189.87/189.87 | 189.77/189.77 | 189.72/189.72 | 189.75/201.82 |
| Mf 4.10 | 285.39/292.61 | 281.73/281.73 | 289.01/289.01 | 281.74/281.74 |
| Mf 8.7 | 148.86/153.15 | 144.70/148.86 | 148.76/152.98 | 140.61/144.02 |
| Mf 8.8 | 241.17/241.17 | 245.49/253.66 | 232.61/245.20 | 236.86/241.07 |
| Ma 1 | 242.27/242.27 | 244.47/244.47 | 242.29/248.63 | 242.22/244.35 |
| Ma 2 | 198.18/198.18 | 196.21/196.21 | 192.01/196.23 | 190.03/202.65 |
| Ma 15 | 223.00/223.00 | 233.34/233.34 | 223.36/223.36 | 223.2/223.2 |
| Mvi 1354 | 221.73/223.63 | 210.02/221.86 | 213.73/225.58 | 219.77/223.68 |
| Mvi 2243 | 178.66/184.90 | 178.59/180.62 | 178.71/180.67 | 176.75/180.82 |
Note: B1, B2, B3 and B4 are four samples of skinned carcasses, which correspond to Nos. 6, 3, 13, and 14, respectively, of the pelt samples, which have the same genotype.