Literature DB >> 30459340

Demographic inferences after a range expansion can be biased: the test case of the blacktip reef shark (Carcharhinus melanopterus).

Pierpaolo Maisano Delser1,2,3,4, Shannon Corrigan5, Gavin J P Naylor5, Stefano Mona6,7, Drew Duckett8, Arnaud Suwalski1,2, Michel Veuille1,2, Serge Planes9.   

Abstract

The evolutionary history of species is a dynamic process as they modify, expand, and contract their spatial distributions over time. Range expansions (REs) occur through a series of founder events that are followed by migration among neighboring demes. The process usually results in structured metapopulations and leaves a distinct signature in the genetic variability of species. Explicitly modeling the consequences of complex demographic events such as REs is computationally very intensive. Here we propose an an alternative approach that requires less computational effort than a comprehensive RE model, but that can recover the demography of species undergoing a RE, by combining spatially explicit modelling with simplified but realistic metapopulation models. We examine the demographic and colonization history of Carcharhinus melanopterus, an abundant reef-associated shark, as a test case. We first used a population genomics approach to statistically confirm the occurrence of a RE in C. melanopterus, and identify its origin in the Indo-Australian Archipelago. Spatial genetic modelling identified two waves of stepping-stone colonization: an eastward wave moving through the Pacific and a westward one moving through the Indian Ocean. We show that metapopulation models best describe the demographic history of this species and that not accounting for this may lead to incorrectly interpreting the observed genetic variation as signals of widespread population bottlenecks. Our study highlights insights that can be gained about demography by coupling metapopulation models with spatial modeling and underscores the need for cautious interpretation of population genetic data when advancing conservation priorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30459340      PMCID: PMC6781168          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-018-0164-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  3 in total

1.  The education of the occupational health nurse.

Authors:  D Smith
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1975 Nov-Dec

2.  Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics.

Authors:  Mark A Beaumont; Wenyang Zhang; David J Balding
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data.

Authors:  R R Hudson; M Slatkin; W P Maddison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Biases in Demographic Modeling Affect Our Understanding of Recent Divergence.

Authors:  Paolo Momigliano; Ann-Britt Florin; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.