Literature DB >> 30459012

Predicting the occurrence of complications following corrective cervical deformity surgery: Analysis of a prospective multicenter database using predictive analytics.

Peter G Passias1, Cheongeun Oh2, Samantha R Horn2, Han Jo Kim3, D Kojo Hamilton4, Daniel M Sciubba5, Brian J Neuman5, Aaron J Buckland2, Gregory W Poorman2, Frank A Segreto2, Cole A Bortz2, Avery E Brown2, Themistocles S Protopsaltis2, Eric O Klineberg6, Christopher Ames7, Justin S Smith8, Virginie Lafage3.   

Abstract

We developed a predictive model to describe risk factors for complications in cervical deformity surgeries. Cervical deformity (CD) surgical patients are growing in number, but remain under-studied in the literature. CD was defined as at least one of the following: C2-C7 Cobb >10°, CL >10°, cSVA >4 cm, CBVA >25°. Patient demographics and clinical data were assessed as risk factors for medical/surgical complications using multivariate regression models. 123 patients underwent CD surgery (60.6 yrs, 60.8% F). The most common complications were neurologic (24.4%), dysphagia (13.0%), cardiopulmonary (11.4%), infection (9.7%). 51 (41.5%) of patients experienced a medical complication and 73 (59.3%) had a surgical complication. An overall complication was predicted with high accuracy (AUC = 0.79) by the following combinations of factors: higher baseline EQ5D pain and lower baseline EQ5D anxiety/depression scores, and higher cervical and global SVA. A medical complication can be predicted by male gender, baseline mJOA score, and cervical SVA (AUC = 0.770). A surgical complication can be predicted by higher estimated blood loss, lower anxiety scores, and larger global SVA (AUC = 0.739). 64.2% of patients undergoing cervical deformity correction sustained any complication. While the most reliable predictor of the occurrence of a complication involved a cluster of risk factors, a radiographic baseline sagittal parameter of cervical SVA was the strongest isolated predictor for complications across categories. Although these findings are specific to a cervical population with moderate to severe deformities, collectively they can be utilized for pre-operative risk assessment and patient education.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical deformity; Clinical outcomes; Health-related quality of life scores; Medical complications; Predictive model; Surgical complications; Surgical correction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30459012     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  7 in total

1.  A new nomenclature system for the surgical treatment of cervical spine deformity, developing, and validation of SOF system.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Heiko Koller; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Wen Yuan; Asdrubal Falavigna; Ho Jin Lee; Jong Beom Lee; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Jong-Hyeok Park; Il Sup Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  G Gargiulo; M Girardo; A Rava; A Coniglio; P Cinnella; A Massè; F Fusini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-08

3.  Full endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of the cervical spine: surgical technique and early experience.

Authors:  Daniel A Carr; Isaac Josh Abecassis; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

4.  Validation of the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator: A Machine-Learning Risk Tool for Predicting Complications and Mortality Following Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery.

Authors:  Katherine E Pierce; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Sara Naessig; Waleed Ahmad; Shaleen Vira; Carl Paulino; Michael Gerling; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

5.  Cost-utility of revisions for cervical deformity correction warrants minimization of reoperations.

Authors:  Samantha R Horn; Peter G Passias; Aaron Hockley; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Hamid Hassanzadeh; Jason A Horowitz; Cole A Bortz; Frank A Segreto; Avery E Brown; Justin S Smith; Daniel M Sciubba; Gregory M Mundis; Michael P Kelley; Alan H Daniels; Douglas C Burton; Robert A Hart; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Richard A Hostin; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

Review 6.  A scoping review of complication prediction models in spinal surgery: An analysis of model development, validation and impact.

Authors:  Toros C Canturk; Daniel Czikk; Eugene K Wai; Philippe Phan; Alexandra Stratton; Wojtek Michalowski; Stephen Kingwell
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-07-14

7.  Neurological Complications and Recovery Rates of Patients With Adult Cervical Deformity Surgeries.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Yu-Cheng Yao; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Michael P Kelly; Munish Gupta; Todd J Albert; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Gregory M Mundis; Peter Passias; Eric Klineberg; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.