Literature DB >> 30458583

Phase II trial design with growth modulation index as the primary endpoint.

Jianrong Wu1,2, Li Chen1,2, Jing Wei3, Heidi Weiss1,2, Rachel W Miller2,4, John L Villano2,5.   

Abstract

Molecularly targeted, genomic-driven, and immunotherapy-based clinical trials continue to be advanced for the treatment of relapse or refractory cancer patients, where the growth modulation index (GMI) is often considered a primary endpoint of treatment efficacy. However, there little literature is available that considers the trial design with GMI as the primary endpoint. In this article, we derived a sample size formula for the score test under a log-linear model of the GMI. Study designs using the derived sample size formula are illustrated under a bivariate exponential model, the Weibull frailty model, and the generalized treatment effect size. The proposed designs provide sound statistical methods for a single-arm phase II trial with GMI as the primary endpoint.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerated failure time model; clinical trial design; growth modulation Index; paired time-to-progression; sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30458583      PMCID: PMC9335177          DOI: 10.1002/pst.1916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.234


  11 in total

1.  Generalized treatment effects for clinical trials.

Authors:  W W Hauck; T Hyslop; S Anderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients' tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Joseph J Stephenson; Peter Rosen; David M Loesch; Mitesh J Borad; Stephen Anthony; Gayle Jameson; Susan Brown; Nina Cantafio; Donald A Richards; Tom R Fitch; Ernesto Wasserman; Cristian Fernandez; Sylvan Green; William Sutherland; Michael Bittner; Arlet Alarcon; David Mallery; Robert Penny
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Statistical methods for a phase II oncology trial with a growth modulation index (GMI) endpoint.

Authors:  Stephanie Kovalchik; William Mietlowski
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  A power analysis of tests for paired lifetime data.

Authors:  William J Owen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  There are no bad anticancer agents, only bad clinical trial designs--twenty-first Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation Award Lecture.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  The design of phase II clinical trials testing cancer therapeutics: consensus recommendations from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee.

Authors:  Lesley Seymour; S Percy Ivy; Daniel Sargent; David Spriggs; Laurence Baker; Larry Rubinstein; Mark J Ratain; Michael Le Blanc; David Stewart; John Crowley; Susan Groshen; Jeffrey S Humphrey; Pamela West; Donald Berry
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Phase II clinical trial design for noncytotoxic anticancer agents for which time to disease progression is the primary endpoint.

Authors:  R Mick; J J Crowley; R J Carroll
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-08

8.  Issues in using progression-free survival when evaluating oncology products.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; Mark D Rothmann; Hong Laura Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Genomic Alteration-Driven Clinical Trial Designs in Oncology.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Evaluation of Treatment Effect with Paired Failure Times in a Single-Arm Phase II Trial in Oncology.

Authors:  Matthieu Texier; Federico Rotolo; Michel Ducreux; Olivier Bouché; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Stefan Michiels
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.238

View more
  3 in total

1.  The progression-free survival ratio as outcome measure in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients: Current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nienke van de Kruis; Phyllis van der Ploeg; Jody H C Wilting; M Caroline Vos; Anna M J Thijs; Joanne de Hullu; Petronella B Ottevanger; Christianne Lok; Jurgen M J Piek
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Molecular Tumor Board-Assisted Care in an Advanced Cancer Population: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rachel W Miller; Megan L Hutchcraft; Heidi L Weiss; Jianrong Wu; Chi Wang; Jinpeng Liu; Rani Jayswal; Mikayla Buchanan; Abigail Anderson; Derek B Allison; Riham H El Khouli; Reema A Patel; John L Villano; Susanne M Arnold; Jill M Kolesar
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-08

3.  Community-driven development of a modified progression-free survival ratio for precision oncology.

Authors:  Andreas Mock; Christoph E Heilig; Simon Kreutzfeldt; Daniel Huebschmann; Christoph Heining; Evelin Schröck; Benedikt Brors; Albrecht Stenzinger; Dirk Jäger; Richard Schlenk; Hanno Glimm; Stefan Fröhling; Peter Horak
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2019-11-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.