Literature DB >> 30457725

First do no harm: overdiagnosis in Pediatrics.

Virginia A Moyer1.   

Abstract

Many errors can be made in diagnosis: underdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, and overdiagnosis. While underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis are clear errors, in overdiagnosis, a true abnormality is discovered, but detection does not benefit the patient. Harm occurs when patients are further evaluated and treated unnecessarily as a result of making a diagnosis that would never have affected the patient if the diagnosis had not been made. Several phenomena point to potential overdiagnosis: when delayed or missed diagnoses do not result in harm; when there is increased detection of a disease, but no change in the outcome; and when randomized trials show no benefit from the diagnosis. Some might say that there is always benefit in knowing, but the adverse effects of overdiagnosis are well documented. We will need to educate ourselves and our colleagues about the potential for harm from overdiagnosis, and learn how to balance the potential benefit of a diagnosis against the risk of overdiagnosis. Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic errors; Overdiagnosis; Unnecessary procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30457725     DOI: 10.5546/aap.2018.eng.426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Argent Pediatr        ISSN: 0325-0075            Impact factor:   0.635


  1 in total

1.  Negligible therapeutic impact, false-positives, overdiagnosis and lead-time are the reasons why radiographs bring more harm than benefits in the caries diagnosis of preschool children.

Authors:  Laura Regina A Pontes; Juan Sebastian Lara; Tatiane Fernandes Novaes; Julia Gomes Freitas; Thais Gimenez; Bruna Lorena P Moro; Haline C M Maia; José Carlos P Imparato; Mariana M Braga; Daniela P Raggio; Fausto M Mendes
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.757

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.