Brendan R Dillon1, Mark A Healy2, Christina W Lee3, Ari C Reichstein4, Maria J Silveira5, Arden M Morris6, Pasithorn A Suwanabol2. 1. 1 University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. 2 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. 3 Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. 4. 4 Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. 5 Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. 6 S-SPIRE Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical patients most commonly receive palliative care services within 24-48 hours of death, and reasons for this delay are poorly understood. Research with nonsurgeons suggests that physician characteristics and beliefs about death and dying may contribute to late referral. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgeon perspectives related to death and dying, and their relationship with delayed referrals to palliative care. DESIGN: Using a previously validated survey instrument supplemented by open-ended questions, deductive content analysis was used to describe surgeon preferences for end-of-life care. SETTINGS: Participants were all current nonretired members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgeon descriptions of a "good death" and how personal experiences influence care provided. RESULTS: Among 131 survey respondents (response rate 16.5%), 117 (89.3%) completed all or part of the qualitative portion of the survey. Respondents consistently reported their personal preferences for end-of-life care, and four central themes emerged: (1) pain and symptom management, (2) clear decision making, (3) avoidance of medical care, and (4) completion. Surgeons also reflected on both good and bad experiences with patients and family members dying, and how these experiences impact practice. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size inherent to Internet surveys may limit generalizability and contribute to selection bias. CONCLUSION: This study reveals surgeon preferences for end-of-life care, which may inform initiatives aimed at surgeons who may underuse or delay palliative care services. Future studies are needed to better understand how surgeon preferences may directly impact treatment recommendations for their patients.
BACKGROUND: Surgical patients most commonly receive palliative care services within 24-48 hours of death, and reasons for this delay are poorly understood. Research with nonsurgeons suggests that physician characteristics and beliefs about death and dying may contribute to late referral. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgeon perspectives related to death and dying, and their relationship with delayed referrals to palliative care. DESIGN: Using a previously validated survey instrument supplemented by open-ended questions, deductive content analysis was used to describe surgeon preferences for end-of-life care. SETTINGS: Participants were all current nonretired members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgeon descriptions of a "good death" and how personal experiences influence care provided. RESULTS: Among 131 survey respondents (response rate 16.5%), 117 (89.3%) completed all or part of the qualitative portion of the survey. Respondents consistently reported their personal preferences for end-of-life care, and four central themes emerged: (1) pain and symptom management, (2) clear decision making, (3) avoidance of medical care, and (4) completion. Surgeons also reflected on both good and bad experiences with patients and family members dying, and how these experiences impact practice. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size inherent to Internet surveys may limit generalizability and contribute to selection bias. CONCLUSION: This study reveals surgeon preferences for end-of-life care, which may inform initiatives aimed at surgeons who may underuse or delay palliative care services. Future studies are needed to better understand how surgeon preferences may directly impact treatment recommendations for their patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
death; end-of-life care; palliative care; perspective; surgeon; surgery