| Literature DB >> 30456896 |
Xavier Poiré1, Myriam Labopin2,3,4,5, Emmanuelle Polge2,3,4,5, Didier Blaise6, Patrice Chevallier7, Johan Maertens8, Eric Deconinck9, Edouard Forcade10, Alessandro Rambaldi11, Gabriela M Baerlocher12, Tsila Zuckerman13, Liisa Volin14, Harry C Schouten15, Norbert Ifrah16, Mohamad Mohty2,3,4,5, Jordi Esteve2,17, Arnon Nagler2,18.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1) with isolated NPM1 mutation (iNPM1m) is considered a good prognosis genotype, although up to one-third relapse. To evaluate the best transplant strategy, we retrospectively compared autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), related (MSD), and fully matched unrelated (MUD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We identified 256 adult patients including 125 auto-SCT, 72 MSD, and 59 MUD. The 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 62% in auto-SCT, 69% in MUD, and 81% in MSD (P = .02 for MSD vs others). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was not different among auto-SCT, MUD, and MSD, reaching 83% (P = .88). The 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 2.5% in auto-SCT and 7.5% in allo-SCT (P = .04). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was higher after auto-SCT (30%) than after MUD (22%) and MSD (12%, P = .01). In multivariate analysis, MSD versus auto-SCT but not MUD versus auto-SCT was associated with lower RI (P < .01 and P = .13, respectively) and better LFS (P = .01 and P = .31, respectively). Age correlated with higher NRM (P < .01). Allo-SCT using MSD appears as a reasonable transplant option for young patients with iNPM1m AML in CR1. Auto-SCT was followed by worse RI and LFS, but similar OS to both allo-SCT modalities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30456896 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hematol ISSN: 0361-8609 Impact factor: 10.047