Beatrice Emmanouil1, Rory Houston2, Anne May1, James D Ramsden2, C Oliver Hanemann3, Dorothy Halliday1,4, Allyson Parry1, Samuel Mackeith1,2. 1. Oxford NF2 Unit, Neurosciences, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2. Department of ENT, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Neurology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom. 4. Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study set out to describe the progression of hearing loss in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), treated in a quaternary multidisciplinary clinic. It also aimed to compare hearing loss across patients grouped according to a known genetic severity score to explore its utility for prognostication. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We conducted a study of 147 patients with confirmed NF2 diagnosis for a mean observational period of 10 years. Pure-tone average (PTA), optimum discriminations scores (ODS), and genotype data were collected. Patients were classified according to hearing class (American Academy of Otolaryngology), their candidacy for auditory implantation (UK National NF2 consensus) and grouped by genetic severity as: 1 = tissue mosaic, 2A = mild classic, 2B = moderate classic, and 3 = severe. Survival analysis investigated the effect of genetic severity on the age of loss of serviceable hearing. RESULTS: Genetic severity was a significant predictor of hearing outcomes such as ODS, hearing classification, and maximum annual PTA deterioration. Although the overall median age of loss of serviceable hearing was 78 years, there was significant variation according to the genetic severity; the median for severe patients was 32 years compared to a median of 80 for tissue mosaic patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first description of long-term hearing outcomes in a clinical setting across a large heterogeneous cohort of patients with NF2. The results highlight the potential importance and benefit of considering the genetic severity score of patients when undertaking treatment decisions, as well as planning future natural history studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c Laryngoscope, 129:974-980, 2019.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study set out to describe the progression of hearing loss in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), treated in a quaternary multidisciplinary clinic. It also aimed to compare hearing loss across patients grouped according to a known genetic severity score to explore its utility for prognostication. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We conducted a study of 147 patients with confirmed NF2 diagnosis for a mean observational period of 10 years. Pure-tone average (PTA), optimum discriminations scores (ODS), and genotype data were collected. Patients were classified according to hearing class (American Academy of Otolaryngology), their candidacy for auditory implantation (UK National NF2 consensus) and grouped by genetic severity as: 1 = tissue mosaic, 2A = mild classic, 2B = moderate classic, and 3 = severe. Survival analysis investigated the effect of genetic severity on the age of loss of serviceable hearing. RESULTS: Genetic severity was a significant predictor of hearing outcomes such as ODS, hearing classification, and maximum annual PTA deterioration. Although the overall median age of loss of serviceable hearing was 78 years, there was significant variation according to the genetic severity; the median for severe patients was 32 years compared to a median of 80 for tissue mosaic patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first description of long-term hearing outcomes in a clinical setting across a large heterogeneous cohort of patients with NF2. The results highlight the potential importance and benefit of considering the genetic severity score of patients when undertaking treatment decisions, as well as planning future natural history studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c Laryngoscope, 129:974-980, 2019.
Authors: Claire Forde; Andrew T King; Scott A Rutherford; Charlotte Hammerbeck-Ward; Simon K Lloyd; Simon R Freeman; Omar N Pathmanaban; Emma Stapleton; Owen M Thomas; Roger D Laitt; Stavros Stivaros; John-Paul Kilday; Grace Vassallo; Catherine McBain; Simon Kerrigan; Miriam J Smith; Martin G McCabe; Elaine F Harkness; D Gareth Evans Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Joshua James Brown; Anne May; Rose Crabtree; Beatrice Emmanouil; Dorothy Halliday; Allyson Parry; Samuel Mackeith Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2021-02
Authors: Khodayar Goshtasbi; Mehdi Abouzari; Tyler M Yasaka; Sina Soltanzadeh-Zarandi; Brooke Sarna; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 2.619
Authors: Luis Lassaletta; Miryam Calvino; Jose Manuel Morales-Puebla; Pablo Lapunzina; Lourdes Rodriguez-de la Rosa; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Victor Martinez-Glez Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 4.003