Literature DB >> 30456694

Central contributions to torque depression: an antagonist perspective.

Caleb T Sypkes1, Vincenzo S Contento1, Leah R Bent1, Chris J McNeil2, Geoffrey A Power3.   

Abstract

Torque depression (TD) is the reduction in steady-state isometric torque following active muscle shortening when compared to an isometric reference contraction at the same muscle length and activation level. Central nervous system excitability differs in the TD state. While torque production about a joint is influenced by both agonist and antagonist muscle activation, investigations of corticospinal excitability have focused on agonist muscle groups. Hence, it is unknown how the TD state affects spinal and supraspinal excitability of an antagonist muscle. Eight participants (~ 24y, three female) performed 14 submaximal dorsiflexion contractions at the intensity needed to maintain a level of integrated electromyographic activity in the soleus equivalent to 15% of that recorded during a maximum plantar flexion contraction. The seven contractions of the TD protocol included a 2 s isometric phase at an ankle angle of 140°, a 1 s shortening phase at 40°/s, and a 7 s isometric phase at an angle of 100°. The seven isometric reference contractions were performed at an ankle angle of 100° for 10 s. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs), and maximal M-waves (Mmax) were recorded from the soleus in both conditions. In the TD compared to isometric reference state, a 13% reduction in dorsiflexor torque was accompanied by 10% lower spinal excitability (normalized CMEP amplitude; CMEP/Mmax), and 17% greater supraspinal excitability (normalized MEP amplitude; MEP/CMEP) for the soleus muscle. These findings demonstrate a neuromechanical coupling following active muscle shortening and indicate that the underlying mechanisms of TD influence antagonist activation during voluntary force production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervicomedullary motor evoked potential CMEP; Integrated electromyography iEMG; Motor evoked potential MEP; Transcranial magnetic stimulation TMS

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30456694     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5435-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Force depression in human quadriceps femoris following voluntary shortening contractions.

Authors:  H D Lee; E Suter; W Herzog
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-11

2.  Effects of speed and distance of muscle shortening on force depression during voluntary contractions.

Authors:  H D Lee; E Suter; W Herzog
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The relationship between force depression following shortening and mechanical work in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  W Herzog; T R Leonard; J Z Wu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Tendon organs of cat medial gastrocnemius: responses to active and passive forces as a function of muscle length.

Authors:  J A Stephens; R M Reinking; D G Stuart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Force depression following muscle shortening of voluntarily activated and electrically stimulated human adductor pollicis.

Authors:  Hae-Dong Lee; Walter Herzog
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Interneuronal relay in spinal pathways from proprioceptors.

Authors:  E Jankowska
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 7.  History dependence of skeletal muscle force production: implications for movement control.

Authors:  Walter Herzog
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 8.  Golgi tendon organs in mammalian skeletal muscle: functional properties and central actions.

Authors:  L Jami
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  The force exerted by active striated muscle during and after change of length.

Authors:  B C ABBOTT; X M AUBERT
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1952-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue.

Authors:  S C Gandevia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 37.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.