Andreas Hinz1, Tobias Luck2,3,4, Steffi G Riedel-Heller3,4, Philipp Y Herzberg5, Claudia Rolffs6,4, Kerstin Wirkner4, Christoph Engel6,4. 1. Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. andreas.hinz@medizin.uni-leipzig.de. 2. Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Social Medicine, Rehabilitation Sciences and Healthcare Research, University of Applied Sciences Nordhausen, Nordhausen, Germany. 3. Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 4. Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, LIFE, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 5. Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut Schmidt University of the Federal Armed Forces, Hamburg, Germany. 6. Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 test is a test of olfactory performance based on pen-like odor dispensing devices. The aims of this study were to analyze the performance of this test in a general population sample and to explore associations between olfactory dysfunction and quality of life. METHODS: A large community sample (n = 7267) completed the Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 test and several questionnaires measuring quality of life, anxiety, dispositional optimism, social support, and satisfaction with life. RESULTS: According to the criteria recommended by the test manufacturer, 5.1% of the participants were anosmic (score ≤ 6), 52.4% were dysosmic (7 ≤ score ≤ 10), and 42.5% were normosmic (score ≥ 11). While frequencies of correct identification differed between the 12 sticks, all sticks contributed positively to the test results. The associations between olfactory functioning and quality of life variables were negligible. In the multivariate analyses, none of the associations reached the 1% significance level. CONCLUSIONS: While studies with patients in otorhinolaryngological clinics often report substantial detriments to their quality of life in relation to olfactory dysfunction, the present epidemiological study cannot confirm this association for the general population.
PURPOSE: The Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 test is a test of olfactory performance based on pen-like odor dispensing devices. The aims of this study were to analyze the performance of this test in a general population sample and to explore associations between olfactory dysfunction and quality of life. METHODS: A large community sample (n = 7267) completed the Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12 test and several questionnaires measuring quality of life, anxiety, dispositional optimism, social support, and satisfaction with life. RESULTS: According to the criteria recommended by the test manufacturer, 5.1% of the participants were anosmic (score ≤ 6), 52.4% were dysosmic (7 ≤ score ≤ 10), and 42.5% were normosmic (score ≥ 11). While frequencies of correct identification differed between the 12 sticks, all sticks contributed positively to the test results. The associations between olfactory functioning and quality of life variables were negligible. In the multivariate analyses, none of the associations reached the 1% significance level. CONCLUSIONS: While studies with patients in otorhinolaryngological clinics often report substantial detriments to their quality of life in relation to olfactory dysfunction, the present epidemiological study cannot confirm this association for the general population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anosmia; General population study; Olfactory dysfunction; Quality of life; Sniffin’ Sticks test
Authors: Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor; Tobias Luck; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Markus Loeffler; Kerstin Wirkner; Christoph Engel Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Jacob C Lucas; Zack Arambula; Alexandra M Arambula; Katherine Yu; Nathan Farrokhian; Linda D'Silva; Hinrich Staecker; Jennifer A Villwock Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 4.086