| Literature DB >> 30456265 |
Dariush Naghipour1, Seyed Davoud Ashrafi2,1, Mozhgan Gholamzadeh1, Kamran Taghavi1, Mohammad Naimi-Joubani2,1,3.
Abstract
In this article, the data of heavy metals phytoremediation efficiency were provided. The Azolla was collected from the lake around the Rasht city and washed in tap water, then weighed (0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 g), and kept for 15 days in the 100 ml disposable container in the presence 5, 10 and 25 mg/L of lead, nickel and cadmium ions. The samples were stored in polyethylene containers for analysis of the metal concentration with ICP-OES. According to the results, removal efficiency was increased from 40% to 70% at 10 days along with the increasing of the biomass from 2.0 to 8.0 g. The removal efficiency of Ni (II), Cd (II), and Pb (II) were increased by increasing the contact time up to 10 days. The removal efficiency decreased by increasing of the metals concentration from 5 to 25 mg/L. The highest removal efficiency was observed at heavy metals concentrations of 5 mg/L and contact time of 10 days. Results showed that Azolla had a high potential for the removal of heavy metals from water resources and it can be used in phytoremediation of heavy metals in environmental refinement projects.Entities:
Keywords: Aqueous solution; Azolla filiculoides; Heavy metals; Phytoremediation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30456265 PMCID: PMC6234267 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Removal efficiency (%) of cadmium (5 mg/L) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 64.66 | 82.33 | 89.45 |
| 10 | 65.24 | 85.12 | 92.11 |
| 15 | 68.04 | 89.64 | 92.84 |
Removal efficiency (%) of cadmium (10 mg/L) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 40.33 | 68.82 | 70.11 |
| 10 | 41.95 | 69.67 | 72.2 |
| 15 | 46.78 | 75.22 | 89.1 |
Removal efficiency (%) of cadmium (25 mg/L) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 34.1 | 40.33 | 83.23 |
| 10 | 36.32 | 45.04 | 78.14 |
| 15 | 38.21 | 74.69 | 66.15 |
Removal efficiency (%) of nickel (5 mg/L) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 42.33 | 57.41 | 68.87 |
| 10 | 46.54 | 61.48 | 69.85 |
| 15 | 49.67 | 53.36 | 71.12 |
Removal efficiency (%) of nickel (10 mg L−1) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 41.34 | 51.7 | 56.3 |
| 10 | 43.61 | 63.23 | 63.33 |
| 15 | 45.13 | 57.74 | 69.42 |
Removal efficiency (%) of nickel (25 mg/L) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 35.56 | 48.77 | 53.34 |
| 10 | 37.94 | 47.52 | 52.44 |
| 15 | 39.65 | 44 | 76.82 |
Removal efficiency (%) of lead (5 mg/L) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 59.76 | 72.31 | 89.87 |
| 10 | 60.9 | 60.9 | 91.25 |
| 15 | 62.7 | 62.7 | 95.41 |
Removal efficiency (%) of lead (10 mg/L) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 30.21 | 60.46 | 68.55 |
| 10 | 36.94 | 36.94 | 77.84 |
| 15 | 41.1 | 41.1 | 97.12 |
Removal efficiency (%) of lead (25 mg/L) by Azolla filiculoides biomass.
| Contact time (day) | Biomass of | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| 5 | 23.1 | 56.5 | 75.68 |
| 10 | 25.89 | 25.89 | 77.16 |
| 15 | 37.55 | 37.55 | 79.24 |
Fig. 1The pictures of the reactor and the used plant in experiments.
| Environmental Sciences | |
| Phytoremediation | |
| Figure and table | |
| Lead, Nickel and Cadmium ions concentration were measured by ICP-OES (Spectro Amitec) | |
| Raw, analyzed | |
| Different concentration of Heavy Metals Lead, Nickel and Cadmium ions in a batch system with different mass of live | |
| Scale up of Phytoremediation results of heavy metals in Lab scale with | |
| Department of Environmental Health engineering, School of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. | |
| Data are included in this article and supplementary file excel. | |