Literature DB >> 30456262

Data supporting assessment for nitrous oxide emissions from soils under traditional cropland and apple orchard in the Loess Plateau of China.

Junzhu Pang1,2,3, Xiaoke Wang2, Changhui Peng1, Yujing Mu4, Zhiyun Ouyang2, Fei Lu2, Hongxing Zhang2, Shuoxin Zhang3, Wenzhao Liu5.   

Abstract

The data presented in this article relates to the research article entitled "Nitrous oxide emissions from soils under traditional cropland and apple orchard in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China" (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.08.027) (Pang et al., 2019). The dataset includes soil N2O emissions for two land use types (wheat field and apple orchard) in the semi-arid Loess Plateau and related environmental factors, such as soil temperature and soil moisture. In addition, the estimated annual average and seasonal cumulative emissions of N2O are presented here. Nitrous oxide emissions were measured by static, closed chamber methods. The data provides evidence for the difference in N2O emissions among two dominant land uses on the Loess Plateau of China.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30456262      PMCID: PMC6234354          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data This data contains key information for N2O emissions from traditional cropland and apple orchard soils in China׳s Loess Plateau. This data can be used to estimate N2O emission from agricultural soil in temperate semi-arid region of China. This data can be used to estimate the impacts of land use change and the seasonal and annual fluctuation of precipitation on N2O emissions on the Loess Plateau in China.

Data

This article presents soil temperature (°C, 10 cm), soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) (%, 0–30 cm) and N2O emission data for two land use types (wheat fields and apple orchards) on the south central Loess Plateau in China (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4). Table 5 includes the estimates of annual average and seasonal cumulative emissions of N2O.
Table 1

Soil temperature, WFPS and N2O emissions of the wheat field.

DateT (°C)WFPS (%)N2O emissions (µg N2O m−2 h1)
2007-4-1113.321.2538.78
2007-4-2913.516.5421.31
2007-5-720.412.4920.22
2007-5-1215.721.421.66
2007-5-1417.219.0514.45
2007-5-1716.514.5819.36
2007-5-2416.718.3428.06
2007-6-1120.342.5828.26
2007-6-2319.746.319.38
2007-6-2521.740.2210.16
2007-7-1020.342.4121.9
2007-7-2619.532.3642.54
2007-7-2921.143.6656.08
2007-8-121.237.3423.18
2007-8-319.235.4826.4
2007-8-1421.521.5924.79
2007-9-222.228.8617.02
2007-9-1817.631.8541.62
2007-9-2715.342.8929.98
2007-10-414.443.1265.04
2007-10-515.343.3493.4
2007-10-109.543.5723.06
2007-10-12943.9223.16
2007-10-139.748.1132.38
2007-10-148.752.2432.38
2007-10-167.952.8319.78
2007-10-1812.142.5317.88
2007-10-218.549.4614.38
2007-10-30661.8227.84
2007-11-173.552.2821.52
2007-12-6−1.444.227.94
2007-12-16038.38.44
2008-1-3−1.343.5119.98
2008-2-230.276.0716.94
2008-2-290.241.3352.68
2008-3-71.442.168.7
2008-3-144.344.2434.56
2008-3-243.640.4515.38
2008-4-910.629.7812.68
2008-4-258.133.1318.2
2008-5-815.124.468.92
2008-5-2318.418.9812.08
2008-6-717.453.2710.88
2008-6-815.442.8934.86
2008-6-2523.147.1318.38
2008-7-321.450.638.04
2008-7-1919.858.6437.9
2008-8-324.236.4852.64
2008-8-42533.8469.38
2008-8-524.836.4818.48
2008-8-62532.0651.48
2008-8-726.830.5146.9
2008-8-1018.938.545.16
2008-8-2516.936.3444.74
2008-9-1111.947.9834.66
2008-9-1416.442.5350.37
2008-9-1517.140.6133.42
2008-9-1615.738.7474.72
2008-9-1716.236.4344.6
2008-9-1816.735.762.54
2008-9-1916.632.9926.5
2008-9-2017.332.8613.02
2008-9-2315.848.5976.28
2008-9-3010.449.2843.86
2008-10-213.447.7657.75
2008-10-41541.2815
2008-10-611.339.6319.84
2008-10-1810.430.3512.78
2008-11-3426.459.68
2008-11-181.628.2918.42
2008-12-31.825.7610.268
2008-12-18−0.926.657.44
2009-1-5−0.826.0311.9
2009-1-22−0.925.048.8
2009-2-10−0.226.0625.44
2009-2-280.930.782.58
2009-3-71.727.1229
2009-3-170.928.1229.7
2009-3-285.524.6549.02
Table 2

Soil temperature, WFPS and N2O emissions of the D 2.5 site in the apple orchard.

DateT (°C)WFPS (%)N2O emissions (µg N2O m2 h1)
2007-4-112424.6216.04
2007-4-2928.322.7931.88
2007-5-739.322.1631.648
2007-5-1224.524.6938.56
2007-5-1422.120.8724.26
2007-5-1725.121.6930.44
2007-5-2424.320.6911.58
2007-6-1124.141.3226.68
2007-6-2325.337.045.74
2007-6-2523.838.4419.88
2007-7-1019.624.6815.858
2007-7-2618.627.258.06
2007-8-1420.147.8121.86
2007-9-222.145.9332.7
2007-9-181844.7532.58
2007-10-149.946.8314.34
2007-10-307.642.3221.04
2007-11-174.836.4613.48
2007-12-6−0.0348.616.34
2007-12-160.647.869.48
2008-1-3–0.866.1729.06
2008-2-230.241.6375.16
2008-2-290.830.2670.8
2008-3-72.442.2714.98
2008-3-146.746.6452.08
2008-3-247.640.322.84
2008-4-913.336.259.8
2008-4-2512.936.8825.74
2008-5-816.328.7123.04
2008-5-2322.322.9626.88
2008-6-718.243.5228.06
2008-6-818.726.6373.46
2008-6-2527.436.4460.3
2008-7-322.842.6158.34
2008-7-1919.145.4852.6
2008-8-1021.244.7833.56
2008-8-2518.838.6374.46
2008-9-1114.149.0532.68
2008-9-3011.960.5425.41
2008-10-1811.230.7522.32
2008-11-35.128.116.2
2008-11-181.728.4810.6
2008-12-30.825.679.6
2008-12-180.625.797.38
2009-1-5−0.825.111.56
2009-1-22−0.925.396.08
2009-2-10−0.225.1911.46
2009-2-280.931.5428.74
2009-3-75.527.7712.64
2009-3-171.828.1228.98
2009-3-288.523.3833.74
Table 3

Soil temperature, WFPS and N2O emissions of the D 1.5 site in the apple orchard.

DateT (°C)WFPS (%)N2O emissions (µg N2O m2 h1)
2007-4-1123.525.4528.22
2007-4-2924.120.9220.808
2007-5-733.422.129.3
2007-5-1219.619.2325.66
2007-5-1421.217.6824.758
2007-5-1724.219.2220.2
2007-5-2421.723.6419.92
2007-6-112237.130.94
2007-6-2323.932.415.76
2007-6-2522.330.1621.02
2007-7-1020.721.4528.48
2007-7-2618.930.6429.74
2007-8-1420.136.655.28
2007-9-222.530.0227.54
2007-9-1820.846.2732.28
2007-10-149.947.4319.36
2007-10-307.640.4713.74
2007-11-174.839.638.64
2007-12-6−0.0841.5821.776
2007-12-161.147.2917.154
2008-1-3−1.258.6921.96
2008-2-231.730.3119.9
2008-2-29131.4869.66
2008-3-73.439.2422.94
2008-3-148.434.1729.54
2008-3-248.137.6517.04
2008-3-296.337.1223.72
2008-3-304.836.2825.71
2008-3-317.138.1438.64
2008-4-16.533.4321.52
2008-4-2633.1825.48
2008-4-46.232.87111.34
2008-4-69.532.7212.18
2008-4-913.640.2331.98
2008-4-128.434.2821.98
2008-4-159.130.9712.3
2008-4-2512.927.740.16
2008-5-816.617.943.04
2008-5-2320.465.333.34
2008-6-717.630.5436.18
2008-6-817.337.5128.56
2008-6-2521.366.34125.44
2008-7-321.848.3491.16
2008-7-192036.4354.3
2008-8-1019.651.1687.4
2008-8-2517.636.2423.02
2008-9-1113.748.448.1
2008-9-3011.655.2713.04
2008-10-1812.531.5831.74
2008-11-35.729.2313.62
2008-11-181.530.397.4
2008-12-30.228.749.388
2008-12-180.129.0110.48
2009-1-5−0.823.8316.88
2009-1-22−0.927.077.02
2009-2-10−0.225.8511.46
2009-2-280.931.126.08
2009-3-75.227.7331.24
2009-3-170.927.76.48
2009-3-209.626.1695.39
2009-3-2111.823.586.7
2009-3-225.521.514.054
2009-3-236.330.2742.672
2009-3-246.618.282.482
2009-3-255.916.53226
2009-3-26618.277.942
2009-3-287.725.0260.48
2009-3-305.625.3632.596
Table 4

Soil temperature, WFPS and N2O emissions of the D 0.5 site in the apple orchard.

DateT (°C)WFPS (%)N2O emissions (µg N2O m−2 h1)
2007-4-1122.925.3320.16
2007-4-2919.721.3727.3
2007-5-728.720.1623.64
2007-5-1218.122.1410.82
2007-5-1420.219.2313.794
2007-5-172020.716.08
2007-5-2418.920.9813.72
2007-6-1122.212.418.82
2007-6-2320.434.9419.82
2007-6-2521.532.3327.8
2007-6-2721.421.5426.33
2007-6-2822.821.0968.4
2007-6-2922.520.4770.835
2007-6-3020.619.6294.9
2007-7-117.319.0761.62
2007-7-320.825.6485.73
2007-7-1019.833.2723.82
2007-7-2618.728.1346.5
2007-8-1419.233.519.02
2007-9-221.838.9610.32
2007-9-1819.532.7472.54
2007-10-1410.762.2915.9
2007-10-307.649.8713.94
2007-11-174.836.1811.94
2007-12-6−0.0136.48.76
2007-12-160.433.749.58
2008-1-3−0.137.9614.94
2008-2-232.370.79108.6
2008-2-29132.9937.34
2008-3-73.933.2538.36
2008-3-148.336.7721.7
2008-3-246.337.9813.88
2008-4-912.636.2231.78
2008-4-2512.434.7715.26
2008-5-815.929.9227.1
2008-5-2319.518.2532.16
2008-6-717.642.0529.3
2008-6-817.6529.1335.78
2008-6-252039.767.04
2008-6-221.421.5418.86
2008-6-2822.821.0963.24
2008-6-2922.520.4779.64
2008-6-3020.623.34105.12
2008-7-117.330.1867.5
2008-7-320.841.51130.26
2008-7-1919.645.66113.06
2008-8-1019.448.2863.92
2008-8-2518.235.8930.36
2008-9-1113.946.0950.54
2008-9-3011.453.3814.34
2008-10-1813.630.3513.82
2008-11-37.426.6811.73
2008-11-181.328.596.56
2008-12-32.624.8216.718
2008-12-18−0.22316.28
2009-1-5−0.822.9722.64
2009-1-22−0.922.695.56
2009-2-10−0.223.287.8
2009-2-280.930.213.32
2009-3-75.625.1329.66
2009-3-171.725.5415.68
2009-3-287.822.1621.04
Table 5

Annual average and seasonal cumulative emissions of N2O (kg N2O h m−2 yr−1).

Annual average N2O emission ± se (kg N2O h m2 yr1)2007 Summer N2O emission ± se (kg N2O h m−2 yr−1)2008 Summer N2O emission ± se (kg N2O h m2 yr1)2008 Freeze -thaw N2O emission ± se (kg N2O h m2 yr1)2009 Freeze -thaw N2O emission ± se (kg N2O h m2 yr1)
Wheat land2.14 ± 0.080.56 ± 0.040.78 ± 0.110.21 ± 0.040.20 ± 0.06
Total apple orchard2.40 ± 0.150.47 ± 0.121.31 ± 0.200.248 ± 0.030.17 ± 0.03
Soil temperature, WFPS and N2O emissions of the wheat field. Soil temperature, WFPS and N2O emissions of the D 2.5 site in the apple orchard. Soil temperature, WFPS and N2O emissions of the D 1.5 site in the apple orchard. Soil temperature, WFPS and N2O emissions of the D 0.5 site in the apple orchard. Annual average and seasonal cumulative emissions of N2O (kg N2O h m−2 yr−1).

Experimental design, materials, and methods

Experimental design

Two neighboring fields on flat land were selected for N2O measurement: (i) a winter wheat field and (ii) an apple orchard that was converted from a wheat field in 1984. In the wheat field, three sub-plots were randomly selected and three chamber bases were installed in each sub-plot (nine chamber bases in total). In the apple orchard, three sub-plots were selected. At each sub-plot, three sites were selected at distances of 2.5 m, 1.5 m and 0.5 m away from tree rows (D 0.5, D 1.5 and D 2.5). Three chamber bases were installed in each sub-plot (nine chamber bases in total).

Material and methods

Nitrous oxide emissions were measured by static, closed chamber methods. Each chamber (50 cm × 50 cm × 50 cm) was constructed with an aluminum alloy frame having transparent PVC and was covered by adiabatic film. The N2O concentration was analyzed by gas chromatography (Model SP3410, Beijing Analytical Instrument Factory), fitted with an electron capture detector (ECD). During each sampling event, soil temperature (0–10 cm), and soil moisture (0–30 cm) were monitored simultaneously. Soil temperatures were measured with a SN2202 digital thermo detector (Sinan Instrument Plant of Beijing Normal University). Soil moisture (0–30 cm) was determined gravimetrically after oven-drying (at 105 °C for 24 h). During the study, soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) was calculated from the values of gravimetric soil water content and soil bulk density. Annual N2O emissions from the apple orchard soil were estimated from an area after weighing the emissions from three sub-sites (D 0.5, D 1.5 and D 2.5). Annual and seasonal cumulative N2O emissions were calculated by integrating weekly fluxes, assuming a constant flux rate between two gas sampling times.
Subject areaEcology, environmental sciences.
More specific subject areaNitrous oxide emissions.
Type of dataTable.
How data was acquiredFiled measurement, sampling and laboratory analysis.
Data formatRaw and analyzed.
Experimental factorsNitrous oxide emissions from crop land and orchard.
Experimental featuresA rain-fed winter wheat field and an apple orchard that was converted from the wheat field in 1984.
Data source location107°41′E, 35°14′N, Changwu country, Shaanxi Province, China.
Data accessibilityData is with this article and related reference.
Related research articlePang et al., Nitrous oxide emissions from soils under traditional cropland and apple orchard in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 269(1):116–124.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.08.027[1].
  2 in total

1.  Identifying barriers to sustainable apple production: A stakeholder perspective.

Authors:  Shan Jin; Wenjing Li; Yiying Cao; Glyn Jones; Jing Chen; Zhenhong Li; Qian Chang; Guijun Yang; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Impact of soil amendments on nitrous oxide emissions and the associated denitrifying communities in a semi-arid environment.

Authors:  Setor Kwami Fudjoe; Lingling Li; Yuji Jiang; Abdul-Rauf Malimanga Alhassan; Junhong Xie; Sumera Anwar; Linlin Wang; Lihua Xie
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.