| Literature DB >> 30456176 |
O O Adewoyin1, M Omeje1, E S Joel1, S A Akinwumi1, C O Ehi-Eromoseled2, Zaidi Embong3.
Abstract
The activity levels of 238U, 232Th and 40K in soil surrounding major office complexes in Covenant University were analyzed for radiological hazards to determine the safety of the residents in such environment. Sixteen (16) soil samples were collected, prepared and sent to Acme laboratory in Canada for analysis with the use of high purity germanium detector. The mean activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th and 40K were found to be 45 ± 10, 135 ± 8 and 195 ± 20 respectively. The concentrations of 238U and 232Th were found to be higher than the world recommended standard of 35 and 30, while the result for 40K was noted to be lower than the world safe limit. The average values of Raeq, D, AED, Iyr, Hex and ELCR in this study were estimated to be 252.33 Bq/kg, 110.15 nGy/h, 0.13 mSv/y, 1.78, 0.68 and 0.47 × 10-3 respectively. It was noticed that none of the measured parameters was higher than the internationally recommended safe limits. 232Th was found to be the major contributor to the environmental radionuclides in the area of study. Therefore, the inhabitants of the office complexes whose environment was assessed are considered not be exposed to any radiological hazards.Entities:
Keywords: Activity concentrations; Covenant University; Gamma-ray; Radiological hazards
Year: 2018 PMID: 30456176 PMCID: PMC6232630 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.10.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MethodsX ISSN: 2215-0161
Fig. 1Geological map of the study area [4].
Fig. 2Base map of the study area and sample locations.
Radioactivity Concentrations of 238U, 232Th and 40K in the Soil samples.
| s/n | Sample Identity | 238U | 232Th | 40K |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CUCRID 7 | 40 ± 10 | 127 ± 9 | 131 ± 18 |
| 2 | CUCRID 8 | 46 ± 10 | 144 ± 9 | 197 ± 21 |
| 3 | CUCRID 13 | 41 ± 9 | 123 ± 8 | 145 ± 19 |
| 4 | CUCRID 27 | 49 ± 10 | 119 ± 9 | 142 ± 21 |
| 5 | SENATE 2 | 47 ± 10 | 112 ± 9 | 66 ± 10 |
| 6 | SENATE 5 | 35 ± 9 | 82 ± 6 | 175 ± 17 |
| 7 | SENATE 6 | 32 ± 8 | 97 ± 6 | 144 ± 15 |
| 8 | SENATE 4 | 47 ± 10 | 88 ± 6 | 102 ± 17 |
| 9 | SPORT 17 | 78 ± 14 | 483 ± 14 | 923 ± 39 |
| 10 | SPORT 8 | 47 ± 10 | 110 ± 8 | 154 ± 19 |
| 11 | SPORT 22 | 35 ± 8 | 78 ± 6 | 130 ± 16 |
| 12 | SPORT 12 | 37 ± 10 | 156 ± 9 | 254 ± 24 |
| 13 | CAFÉ 4 | 48 ± 9 | 118 ± 8 | 127 ± 20 |
| 14 | CAFÉ 3 | 46 ± 11 | 119 ± 9 | 167 ± 21 |
| 15 | CAFÉ 6 | 42 ± 10 | 85 ± 6 | 132 ± 17 |
| 16 | CAFÉ 9 | 50 ± 10 | 111 ± 8 | 127 ± 20 |
| 45 ± 10 | 135 ± 8 | 195 ± 20 |
Radiological Parameters considered in the Present Study.
| s/n | Sample ID | Raeq | D | AED | Iyr | Hex | ELCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CUCRID 7 | 231.7 | 100.65 | 0.12 | 1.63 | 0.63 | 0.42 |
| 2 | CUCRID 8 | 267.09 | 116.44 | 0.14 | 1.88 | 0.72 | 0.49 |
| 3 | CUCRID 13 | 228.06 | 99.28 | 0.12 | 1.60 | 0.61 | 0.42 |
| 4 | CUCRID 27 | 230.1 | 100.44 | 0.12 | 1.62 | 0.62 | 0.42 |
| 5 | SENATE 2 | 212.24 | 92.11 | 0.11 | 1.47 | 0.57 | 0.39 |
| 6 | SENATE 5 | 165.74 | 73.0 | 0.09 | 1.17 | 0.45 | 0.32 |
| 7 | SENATE 6 | 181.8 | 79.37 | 0.10 | 1.28 | 0.49 | 0.35 |
| 8 | SENATE 4 | 180.69 | 79.11 | 0.10 | 1.26 | 0.49 | 0.35 |
| 9 | SPORT 17 | 839.76 | 366.26 | 0.45 | 5.97 | 2.26 | 1.60 |
| 10 | SPORT 8 | 216.16 | 94.57 | 0.12 | 1.51 | 0.58 | 0.42 |
| 11 | SPORT 22 | 156.55 | 68.7 | 0.08 | 1.10 | 0.42 | 0.28 |
| 12 | SPORT 12 | 279.64 | 121.9 | 0.15 | 1.98 | 0.75 | 0.53 |
| 13 | CAFÉ 4 | 226.52 | 98.75 | 0.12 | 1.59 | 0.62 | 0.42 |
| 14 | CAFÉ 3 | 229.03 | 100.09 | 0.12 | 1.61 | 0.61 | 0.42 |
| 15 | CAFÉ 6 | 173.71 | 76.24 | 0.09 | 1.22 | 0.47 | 0.32 |
| 16 | CAFÉ 9 | 218.51 | 95.44 | 0.12 | 1.53 | 0.60 | 0.42 |
Fig. 3The contributions of 238U, 232Th and 40K to Raeq in each Sample.
Fig. 4The contributions of 238U, 232Th and 40K to D (mSv/y) in each Sample.