| Literature DB >> 30455965 |
Jane Fisher1, Thach Tran1, Karen Wynter1, Harriet Hiscock2,3,4, Jordana Bayer2,4,5, Heather Rowe1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: What Were We Thinking (WWWT) is a gender-informed, psychoeducational programme to promote respectful relationships and skilled management of unsettled infant behaviours and thereby reduce postpartum common mental disorders. It comprises a highly structured seminar for couples and babies, usual primary care from a WWWT-trained nurse and take-home print materials. The aim was to assess long-term outcomes after a cluster randomised controlled trial of WWWT.Entities:
Keywords: Interventions; postnatal common mental disorders; prevention; psychoeducation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30455965 PMCID: PMC6236212 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2018.20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Ment Health (Camb) ISSN: 2054-4251
Fig. 1.Study profile.
Baseline characteristics of women who provided complete and incomplete data
| Complete ( | Incomplete | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Socio-demographic | |||
| Age (years) , mean < | 32.1<5.0> | 31.1<5.4> | 0.124 |
| Born in Australia, | 246 (78.3) | 60 (69.7) | 0.097 |
| Speak only English at home, | 266 (84.7) | 67 (77.9) | 0.134 |
| Holds a health-care card | 36 (11.5) | 19 (22.1) | 0.011 |
| Married, | 228 (72.6) | 55 (64.0) | 0.083 |
| Highest education level, | 0.002 | ||
| University degree or above | 206 (65.6) | 43 (50.0) | |
| Post-secondary trade training or certificate | 61 (19.4) | 16 (18.6) | |
| Up to or complete secondary schooling | 47 (15.0) | 27 (31.4) | |
| Managerial or professional occupation | 175 (55.7) | 32 (37.2) | 0.002 |
| Childhood maltreatment, | |||
| Physical abuse | 21 (6.6) | 8 (9.3) | 0.407 |
| Sexual abuse | 6 (1.9) | 2 (2.3) | 0.811 |
| Vulnerable Personality Scale | |||
| Vulnerability Subscale score, median [IQR] | 12 [9–15] | 11 [9–15] | 0.489 |
| Intimate Bonds Measure | |||
| Care Subscale score, median [IQR] | 34 [32–36] | 35 [33–36] | 0.779 |
| Control Subscale score, median [IQR] | 4 [2–6] | 4 [2–6] | 0.769 |
| Mental health | |||
| PHQ-9 score, median [IQR] | 3 [2–5] | 2.5 [1–5] | 0.934 |
| GAD-7 score, median [IQR] | 2 [1–5] | 2 [0–5] | 0.677 |
| Psychiatric history, | 79 (25.1) | 19 (22.1) | 0.558 |
Withdrew at trial endline or at follow-up.
Health-care cards are held by people whose main income is a social protection benefit, who are unwaged students or have a very low household income.
IQR, interquartile range.
Conditional Latent Growth Curve Model of women's GAD-7 scores from 6 weeks to 18 months postpartum
| Coefficient | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|
| GAD-7 trajectories | ||
| Mean GAD-7 score at 6 weeks postpartum | ||
| Change in GAD-7 score from 6 weeks to 18 months postpartum | −0.24 | [−1.63 to 1.15] |
| Characteristics associated with GAD-7 score at baseline (linear regression) | ||
| Trial arm (intervention cf. control) | ||
| Age (in years) | 0.01 | [−0.07 to 0.07] |
| Language spoken at home (only English cf. other languages) | −0.82 | [−1.69 to 0.04] |
| Education level (university degree cf. partial or complete secondary or certificate level) | 0.16 | [−0.54 to 0.86] |
| Marital status (married cf. | 0.33 | [−0.43 to 1.09] |
| Occupation (managerial or professional cf. other occupations) | 0.12 | [−0.52 to 0.75] |
| Holds a health-care card (yes cf. no) | 0.41 | [−0.38 to 1.20] |
| VPS Vulnerability Subscale score | ||
| Past psychiatric illness (yes cf. no) | 0.62 | [−0.06 to 1.30] |
| Childhood physical/sexual abuse (yes cf. no) | 0.69 | [−0.61 to 1.99] |
| Number of pregnancies (one cf. >1) | −0.08 | [−0.60 to 0.44] |
| Duration of baby's crying/fussing prior 24 h (≥3 cf. <3 h) | −0.09 | [−0.79 to 0.62] |
| Baby's sleep a problem in past 2 weeks (yes cf. no) | ||
| IBM Care score | 0.11 | [−0.70 to 0.92] |
| IBM Control score | 0.63 | [−0.16 to 1.42] |
| Characteristics predicting change of GAD-7 scores from baseline to follow-up (linear regression) | ||
| Trial arm (intervention cf. control) | − | [− |
| Age (in years) | 0.01 | [−0.05 to 0.05] |
| Language at home (English cf. others) | 0.37 | [−0.03 to 0.78] |
| Education level (university degree cf. partial or complete secondary or certificate level) | −0.08 | [−0.59 to 0.43] |
| Marital status (married cf. | 0.04 | [−0.32 to 0.40] |
| Occupation (managerial or professional cf. other occupations) | 0.07 | [−0.30 to 0.43] |
| Holds a health-care card (yes cf. no) | 0.37 | [−0.19 to 0.92] |
| VPS Vulnerability Subscale score | − | [− |
| Past psychiatric illness (yes cf. no) | 0.28 | [−0.15 to 0.70] |
| Childhood physical or sexual abuse (yes cf. no) | −0.19 | [−0.84 to 0.47] |
| Number of pregnancies (one cf. >1) | 0.17 | [−0. 18 to 0.51] |
| Duration of baby's crying/fussing prior 24 h (≥3 cf. <3 h) | 0.06 | [−0.33 to 0.43] |
| Baby's sleep a problem in past 2 weeks (yes cf. no) | − | [− |
| IBM Care score | −0.12 | [−0.54 to 0.30] |
| IBM Control score | −0.34 | [−0.98 to 0.31] |
| RMSEA (probability RMSEA ⩽0.05) | 0.025 (0.90) | |
| Comparative fit index | 0.987 | |
| Tucker–Lewis index | 0.960 |
All regression coefficients were estimated simultaneously using Conditional Latent Growth Curve Model. Significant regression coefficients are in bold.
Intercept.
Slope.
Conditional Latent Growth Curve Model of women's PHQ-9 scores from 6 weeks to 18 months postpartum
| Coefficient | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|
| PHQ-9 trajectories | ||
| Mean PHQ-9 score at 6 weeks postpartum | ||
| Change in PHQ-9 score from 6 weeks to 18 months postpartum | −0.12 | [−1.61 to 1.37] |
| Characteristics associated with PHQ-9 scores at baseline (linear regression) | ||
| Trial arm (intervention cf. control) | 0.50 | [−0.04 to 1.05] |
| Age (in years) | 0.01 | [−0.06 to 0.08] |
| Language spoken at home (only English cf. other languages) | − | [− |
| Education level (university degree cf. partial or complete secondary or certificate level) | −0.14 | [−0.70 to 0.43] |
| Marital status (married cf. | 0.64 | [−0.05 to 1.34] |
| Occupation (managerial or professional cf. other occupations) | −0.05 | [−0.63 to 0.52] |
| Holds a health-care card (yes cf. no) | 0.89 | [−0.04 to 1.83] |
| VPS Vulnerability Subscale score | ||
| Past psychiatric illness (yes cf. no) | ||
| Childhood physical/sexual abuse (yes cf. no) | 0.90 | [−0.32 to 2.11] |
| Number of pregnancies (one cf. >1) | −0.18 | [−0.70 to 0.33] |
| Duration of baby's crying/fussing prior 24 h (≥3 cf. <3 h) | 0.01 | [−0.55 to 0.57] |
| Baby's sleep a problem in past 2 weeks (yes cf. no) | ||
| IBM Care score | −0.32 | [−1.12 to 0.49] |
| IBM Control score | 0.32 | [−0.57 to 1.21] |
| Characteristics predicting change of PHQ-9 scores from baseline to follow-up (linear regression) | ||
| Trial arm (intervention cf. control) | −0.27 | [−0.63 to 0.08] |
| Age (in years) | −0.01 | [−0.06 to 0.04] |
| Language spoken at home (English cf. other languages) | ||
| Education level (university degree cf. partial or complete secondary or certificate level) | −0.15 | [−0.61 to 0.32] |
| Marital status (married cf. | −0.11 | [−0.47 to 0.26] |
| Occupation (managerial or professional cf. other occupations) | −0.06 | [−0.46 to 0.35] |
| Holds a health-care card (yes cf. no) | 0.21 | [−0.60 to 1.02] |
| VPS Vulnerability Subscale score | −0.02 | [−0.09 to 0.05] |
| Past psychiatric illness (yes cf. no) | 0.03 | [−0.47 to 0.53] |
| Childhood physical/sexual abuse (yes cf. no) | −0.41 | [−1.01 to 0.19] |
| Number of pregnancies (one cf. >1) | 0.15 | [−0.27 to 0.57] |
| Duration of baby's crying/fussing prior 24 h (≥3 cf. <3 h) | 0.17 | [−0.13 to 0.47] |
| Baby's sleep a problem in past 2 weeks (yes cf. no) | − | [− |
| IBM Care score | −0.29 | [−0.85 to 0.28] |
| IBM Control score | 0.36 | [−0.25 to 0.97] |
| RMSEA (probability RMSEA ⩽0.05) | 0.04 (0.50) | |
| Comparative fit index | 0.950 | |
| Tucker–Lewis index | 0.901 |
All regression coefficients were estimated simultaneously using Conditional Latent Growth Curve Model. Significant regression coefficients are in bold.
Intercept.
Slope.
PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores of 314 women (152 in the control arm and 162 in the intervention arm) who provided complete data
| Baseline | Trial endline | Follow-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | Intervention | |
| PHQ-9 score, median [IQR] | 2 [1–5] | 3 [2–5] | 3 [1–4.5] | 2 [1–5] | 3 [1–5] | 3 [1–5] |
| PHQ-9 severity, | ||||||
| None (score ⩽4) | 108 (71.1) | 107 (66.0) | 114 (75) | 116 (71.6) | 110 (72.4) | 115 (71.0) |
| Mild (5–9) | 37 (24.3) | 40 (24.7) | 32 (21.1) | 34 (21.0) | 33 (21.7) | 38 (23.4) |
| Moderate or severe (10+) | 7 (4.6) | 15 (9.3) | 6 (3.9) | 12 (7.4) | 9 (5.9) | 9 (5.6) |
| GAD score, median [IQR] | 2 [1–4] | 3 [1–6] | 2 [1–5] | 2 [1–5] | 2 [0–5] | 2 [1–4] |
| GAD severity, | ||||||
| None (score ⩽4) | 116 (76.3) | 108 (66.7) | 108 (71.1) | 118 (72.9) | 113 (74.3) | 129 (79.6) |
| Mild (5–9) | 30 (19.7) | 41 (25.3) | 37 (24.3) | 30 (18.5) | 33 (21.7) | 24 (14.8) |
| Moderate or severe (10+) | 6 (4.0) | 13 (8.0) | 7 (4.6) | 14 (8.6) | 6 (4.0) | 9 (5.6) |
PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores of 162 women in the intervention arm who provided complete data and received with the partial (83 women) or full (79 women) intervention
| Baseline | Trial endline | Follow-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partial | Full | Partial | Full | Partial | Full | |
| PHQ-9 score, median [IQR] | 3 [2–5] | 4 [2–6] | 2 [1–4] | 2 [1–5] | 3 [1–5] | 3 [1–6] |
| PHQ-9 severity, | ||||||
| None (score ⩽4) | 58 (69.9) | 49 (62.0) | 63 (75.9) | 53 (67.1) | 62 (74.7) | 53 (67.1) |
| Mild (5–9) | 19 (22.9) | 21 (26.7) | 16 (19.3) | 18 (22.8) | 18 (21.7) | 20 (25.3) |
| Moderate or severe (10+) | 6 (7.2) | 9 (11.3) | 4 (4.8) | 8 (10.1) | 3 (3.6) | 6 (7.6) |
| GAD score, median [IQR] | 2 [0–4] | 4 [2–6] | 2 [1–4] | 3 [1–6] | 2 [0–4] | 2 [1–4] |
| GAD severity, | ||||||
| None (score ⩽4) | 64 (77.1) | 44 (55.7) | 69 (83.1) | 49 (62.0) | 66 (79.5) | 63 (79.8) |
| Mild (5–9) | 15 (18.1) | 26 (32.9) | 10 (12.1) | 20 (25.3) | 11 (13.3) | 13 (16.4) |
| Moderate or severe (10+) | 4 (3.8) | 9 (11.4) | 4 (2.8) | 10 (12.7) | 6 (7.2) | 4 (3.8) |