| Literature DB >> 30455547 |
Claudia D Schneider1,2, Patricia M Bock3,4, Georgia F Becker1, Jose Claudio F Moreira5, Adriane Bello-Klein6, Alvaro R Oliveira1.
Abstract
Intense exercise generates an imbalance in the redox system. However, chronic exercise can yield antioxidant adaptations. A few studies with humans have investigated the effects of antioxidant diets on athletes. Therefore we compared the effects of two dietary interventions on oxidative stress in competitive triathletes. Thirteen male triathletes were selected and divided into 2 groups: one that had a regular antioxidant diet (RE-diet) and the other that had a high antioxidant diet (AO-diet). The diet period was 14 days and blood samples were collected before and after this period. The AO-diet provided twice the dietary reference intake (DRI) of α-tocopherol (30 mg), five times the DRI of ascorbic acid (450 mg), and twice the DRI of vitamin A (1800 g), while the RE-diet provided the DRI of α-tocopherol (15 mg), twice the DRI of ascorbic acid (180 mg) and the DRI of vitamin A (900 μg). The oxidative stress parameters evaluated were: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), total reactive antioxidant potential (TRAP), total sulfhydryl, carbonyl, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, hydrogen peroxide consumption and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity. We observed, after the diet period, an increase in sulfhydryl, TRAP, TBARS and SOD activity, and a decrease in carbonyl levels. However, no changes were found in hydrogen peroxide consumption or GPx activity. We concluded that antioxidant-enriched diets can improve the redox status of triathletes.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; Athletes; Food; Oxidative stress; Vitamins
Year: 2018 PMID: 30455547 PMCID: PMC6234303 DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2018.74194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Sport ISSN: 0860-021X Impact factor: 2.806
Baseline physical characteristics, maximal aerobic power and training parameters of participants.
| Parameter | Regular-diet ( | Antioxidant-diet ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 32.0 (27.3-33.8) | 30.0 (25.5-37) | 0.474 |
| Height (m) | 1.74 (1.70-1.77) | 1.78 (1.73-1.83) | 0.317 |
| Body mass (kg) | 73.6 (69.9-80.1) | 76.3 (70.8-81.3) | 0.830 |
| Body fat (%) | 13.0 (9.5-18.5) | 14.1 (11.0-22.0) | 0.522 |
| VO2max treadmill (ml/kg/min) | 59.7 (51.2-68.0) | 58.6 (54.4-60.5) | 0.391 |
| VO2max cycle ergometer (ml/kg/min) | 65.3 (54.9-68.7) | 56.8 (53.4-63.3) | 0.200 |
| Treadmill threshold (% VO2max) | 50.9 (43.6-61.2) | 49.8 (46.4-50.5) | 0.271 |
| Cycle ergometer threshold (% VO2max) | 50.1 (41.0-56.0) | 48.6 (41.0-51.8) | 0.631 |
| Training load (h/week) | 17.2 (11.6-20.6) | 16.7 (14.2-16.8) | 0.390 |
| Training in triathlon (years) | 5.5 (3.3-9.0) | 4.0 (2.8-7.5) | 0.828 |
Note: Data expressed as median (interquartile range (p25-p75)). No differences between groups were observed. Comparisons were tested by Mann-Whitney U test.
Nutritional intake parameters.
| Parameter | Regular-diet ( | Antioxidant-diet ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous diet | Intervention | Previous diet | Intervention | ||||
| Energy (kcal) | 2986 ± 946 | 3070 ± 858 | 3292 ± 817 | 3261 ± 586 | 0.583 | 0.298 | 0.462 |
| Energy (kcal/kg) | 40.9 ± 16.2 | 42.0 ± 15.1 | 46.1 ± 10.8 | 44.8 8.6 | 0.642 | 0.312 | 0.550 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 55.4 ±7.9 | 60.3 ± 3.6 | 53.1 4.2 | 58.4 ± 3.6 | 0.339 | 0.000 | 0.800 |
| Protein (%) | 18.7 ± 2.9 | 16.5 ± 2.1 | 17.9 5.7 | 16.0 ± 2.9 | 0.756 | 0.005 | 0.978 |
| Protein (g/kg) | 1.89 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 1.96 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0.800 | 0.048 | 0.877 |
| Fat (%) | 25.9 ± 6.3 | 23.2 ± 2.1 | 28.9 ± 4.2 | 25.6 3.1 | 0.114 | 0.024 | 0.792 |
| Fiber (g) | 30.0 ± 10.8 | 38.4 ± 9.3 | 23.2 ± 5.9 | 39.8 ± 6.7 | 0.624 | 0.000 | 0.046 |
| α-tocopherol (mg) | 8.2 (4.9-10.8) | 15.5 (14.3-16.4) | 14.1 (7.2-19.6) | 30.6 (29.3-31.2) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.074 |
| β-carotene ( | 1908 (749-2680) | 889 (847-1016) | 1008 (531-1419) | 1897 (1768-1940) | 0.969 | 0.894 | 0.057 |
| Ascorbic acid (mg) | 181.2 (77.7-253.2)a | 203.6 (195.1-212.6)a | 167.4 (87.8-240.3)a | 483.9 (459.0-498.2)b | 0.090 | 0.006 | 0.029 |
Note: Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range (p25-p75)). Different letters mean p<0.05 intragroup.
Haematological parameters.
| Indices | Regular-diet ( | Antioxidant-diet ( | Reference value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | After 14 d | Baseline | After 14 d | |||||
| Erythrocyte (106/ | 4.95±0.39 | 5.08±0.45 | 5.10±0.12 | 5.17±0.12 | 0.439 | 0.002 | 0.427 | 4.5 – 6.1 |
| Hematocrite (%) | 45.22.0 | 46.1±2.3 | 45.4±1.8 | 45.8±1.5 | 0.958 | 0.022 | 0.284 | 39.0 – 50.0 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 15.3±0.8 | 15.3±0.9 | 15.4±0.6 | 15.4±0.5 | 0.745 | 0.652 | 0.972 | 13.3 – 16.7 |
Note: Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
FIG.1Enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers.
Note: GPx: glutathione peroxidase (mmol/min/mg prot) (Panel A); SOD: superoxide dismutase (U SOD/mg prot) (Panel B); H2O2 consumption (pmol/mg prot) (Panel C).
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data are presented as means and SD, analysed by GEE. SOD increased after interventions (p group>0.05, p time<0.05 and p interaction>0.05).
FIG. 2Non-enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers.
Note: TRAP: total antioxidant capacity (μmol/l Trolox) (Panel A); sulfhydryl (nmol/mg prot) (Panel B); carbonyl (nmol/mg prot) (Panel C); TBARS thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (nmol/mg prot) (Panel D). Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data are presented as means and SD, analysed by GEE. TRAP, sulfhydryl and TBARS increased after interventions, and carbonyl decreased after interventions (p group>0.05, p time<0.05 and p interaction>0.05).