Literature DB >> 30455475

Genetic predictors of response to specific drugs in primary myelofibrosis.

Domenico Penna1, Natasha Szuber1, Terra L Lasho1, Christy M Finke1, Rangit R Vallapureddy1, Curtis A Hanson2, Rhett P Ketterling3, Animesh Pardanani1, Naseema Gangat1, Ayalew Tefferi4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30455475      PMCID: PMC6242902          DOI: 10.1038/s41408-018-0158-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


× No keyword cloud information.
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) constitutes clonal expansion of myeloid cells and is characterized by “driver” (i.e., JAK2, CALR, and MPL) and other mutations or DNA variants, such as ASXL1, TET2, SRSF2, IDH1, IDH2, and U2AF1[1-3]. Patients with PMF have an estimated median survival of 6 years and causes of death include leukemic transformation; in addition, quality of life is markedly impaired in PMF as result of frequent red blood cell transfusion requirement, markedly enlarged spleen and severe constitutional symptoms[4,5]. At present allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the only treatment modality with potential to either cure the disease or prolong survival of patients with PMF, while current drug therapy offers palliative value only (e.g., reduction in spleen size, reduction of constitutional symptoms, and improvement in anemia)[6,7]. In this regard, hydroxyurea (HU), JAK2 inhibitors, and interferon (IFN)-α are often used for symptomatic splenomegaly: JAK2 inhibitors for constitutional symptoms and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), and androgens for anemia[8]. The current study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB) and represents a retrospective evaluation of specific drug response, in terms of anemia or splenomegaly, in patients with PMF receiving these agents as first-line treatment. Diagnoses and treatment approaches were in accordance with what was considered standard of care at the time of initial diagnosis or first referral[9]. Study patients were recruited from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Diagnoses were according to the 2016 World Health Organization criteria[10]. To ascertain the role of genetic biomarkers, study inclusion criteria included availability of karyotype and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-derived mutation information. Variables evaluated included those that are currently listed in MIPSS70 (mutation-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for transplant-age patients), MIPSS70 + version 2.0 (karyotype-enhanced MIPSS70), and GIPSS (genetically-inspired prognostic scoring system)[11-13]. For the purposes of the current study, conventional response criteria were modified to reflect clinical benefit assessment without strict adherence to criteria designed for clinical trials. Accordingly, spleen response was evaluated only in patients with palpable splenomegaly and was defined as a minimum 50% reduction in palpable spleen size, regardless of response duration. Anemia response was evaluated only in patients with hemoglobin level < 10 g/dl and was defined as achieving transfusion-independence lasting for at least 1 month or an increase in hemoglobin of 2 g/dl, regardless of response duration[14]. Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of diagnosis or first referral, which coincided, in all instances, with time of sample collection for mutation analysis. Conventional methods were used for statistical analysis (JMP® Pro 13.0.0 software; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A total of 432 cytogenetically- and molecularly-annotated patients with PMF were accessed (Supplementary Table 1) in order to identify 333 patients who received first-line treatment with HU (n = 97), JAK2 inhibitors (n = 41), IFN-α (n = 22), IMiDs (n = 58), androgens (n = 19), ESAs (n = 54), and various other drugs (n = 42), and were evaluable for response. Presenting features of the 333 study patients (median age 64 years; 68% males) included palpable splenomegaly (77%), moderate to severe anemia (58%), constitutional symptoms (31%), platelet count < 100 × 109/l (20%), leukocytosis > 25 × 109/l (14%), and ≥ 2% circulating blasts (30%). Driver mutational status was JAK2 59%, CALR type 1/like 20%, CALR type 2/like 4%, MPL 7%, and triple-negative 10%. Karyotype included very high risk (VHR) 6%, unfavorable 18%, and favorable 76%, according to the recently revised system[15]. Sixty percent of the patients harbored high molecular risk (HMR) mutations, including ASXL1 (45%), SRSF2 (18%), U2AF1Q157 (10%), EZH2 (4%), IDH2 (4%), and IDH1 (2%). MIPSS70 + version 2.0 risk distribution was as follows: very high 17%, high 46%, intermediate 21%, low 14%, and very low 2%. Overall, 249 patients were evaluable for spleen response, including 218 that were treated with the specific drugs analyzed in the current study (Table 1). Anemia response was evaluated in 222 patients (118 were red cell transfusion-dependent), including 194 (105 transfusion-dependent) that were treated with the specific drugs analyzed in the current study (Table 2).
Table 1

Predictors of spleen response to specific drugs in patients with primary myelofibrosis receiving these agents as first-line treatment

Baseline characteristicsHU (n = 73)Response (n; %)P valueJAK2 inhibitors (n = 40)Response (n; %)P valueIFN-α (n = 17)Response (n; %)P valueIMiDs (n = 41)Response (n; %)P valueAndrogens (n = 11)Response (n; %)P valueESAs (n = 36)Response (n; %)P value
Age
>70 years; n (%)17 (23)4 (24)0.76 (15)3 (50)0.6*1 (6)1 (100)0.112 (29)3 (25)0.34 (36)1 (25)0.315 (42)0-
70 years; n (%)56 (77)16 (29)34 (85)23 (68)16 (94)2 (12)29 (71)4 (14)7 (64)021 (58)0
Sex
Males; n (%)51 (70)16 (31)0.324 (60)12 (50) 0.01 8 (47)2 (25)0.530 (73)4 (13)0.38 (73)1 (12)122 (61)0-
Females; n (%)22 (30)4 (18)16 (40)14 (87)9 (53)1 (11)11 (27)3 (27)*3 (27)014 (39)0
Moderate/severe anemia (sex-adjusted)
Presence; n (%)34 (47)6 (18)0.114 (35)8 (57)0.56 (35)1 (17)133 (81)7 (21)0.39 (82)1 (11)126 (74)0-
Absence; n (%)39 (53)14 (36)26 (65)18 (69)11 (65)2 (18)8 (19)0*2 (18)09 (26)0
Transfusion dependency
Presence; n (%)16 (22)4 (25)18 (20)4 (50)0.44 (23)1 (25)124 (59)4 (17)14 (36)0118 (50)0-
Absence; n (%)57 (78)16 (28)32 (80)22 (69)13 (76)2 (15)17 (41)3 (18)7 (64)1 (14)18 (50)0
Platelets
<100 × 109/L; n (%)11 (15)1 (9)0.25 (12)2 (40)0.35 (29)1 (20)112 (29)1 (8)0.66 (55)1 (17)17 (19)0-
≥100 × 109/L; n (%)62 (85)19 (31)35 (88)24 (35)12 (71)2 (17)29 (71)6 (21)5 (45)029 (81)0
Leukocytes
>25 × 109/L; n (%)15 (21)2 (13)0.16 (15)2 (33)0.13 (18)015 (12)00.5*2 (18)016 (17)0-
≤25 × 109/L; n (%)58 (79)18 (31)34 (85)24 (71)14 (82)3 (21)36 (88)7 (19)9 (82)1 (11)29 (83)0
Circulating blasts
≥2%; n (%)21 (29)4 (19)0.516 (41)9 (56)0.56 (35)00.514 (34)1 (7)0.33 (27)0112 (33)0-
<2%; n (%)51 (71)15 (29)23 (59)16 (70)11 (65)3 (27)27 (66)6 (22)8 (73)1 (12)24 (67)0
Constitutional symptoms
Presence; n (%)27 (37)6 (22)0.513 (32)8 (62)14 (24)1 (25)115 (37)2 (13)13 (27)0112 (33)0-
Absence; n (%)46 (63)14 (31)27 (68)18 (67)13 (76)2 (15)26 (63)5 (19)8 (73)1 (12)24 (67)0
Palpable splenomegaly
Presence; n (%)63 (86)16 (25)0.433 (82)23 (70)0.215 (88)3 (20)139 (95)7 (18)19 (82)00.131 (86)0-
Absence; n (%)10 (14)4 (40)7 (18)3 (43)2 (12)0*2 (5)0*2 (18)1 (50)5 (14)0
Favorable karyotype
Presence; n (%)53 (73)17 (32)0.232 (80)20 (62)0.614 (82)3 (21)129 (71)6 (21)0.69 (82)1 (11)127 (75)0-
Absence; n (%)20 (27)3 (15)8 (20)6 (75)3 (18)012 (29)1 (8)*2 (18)09 (25)0
Unfavorable karyotype
Presence; n (%)15 (21)3 (20)0.78 (20)6 (75)0.6*0--7 (17)00.3*2 (18)016 (17)0-
Absence; n (%)58 (79)17 (29)32 (80)20 (62)17 (100)3 (18)34 (83)7 (21)9 (82)1 (11)30 (83)0
VHR karyotype
Presence; n (%)5 (7)00.3*0--3 (18)015 (12)1 (20)1*0--3 (8)0-
Absence; n (%)68 (93)20 (29)40 (100)26 (65)14 (82)3 (21)36 (88)6 (17)11 (100)1 (9)33 (92)0
JAK2 mutation
Presence; n (%)53 (73)13 (25)0.325 (62)16 (64)18 (47)2 (25)0.522 (54)3 (14)0.65 (45)1 (20)0.419 (53)0-
Absence; n (%)20 (27)7 (35)15 (38)10 (67)9 (53)1 (11)19 (46)4 (21)6 (55)017 (47)0
CALR type-1/like mutation
Presence; n (%)12 (16)4 (33)0.710 (25)9 (90)0.066 (35)1 (17)112 (29)3 (25)0.3*2 (18)016 (17)0-
Absence; n (%)61 (84)16 (26)30 (75)17 (57)11 (65)2 (18)29 (71)4 (14)9 (82)1 (11)30 (83)0
CALR type-2/like mutation
Presence; n (%)3 (4)2 (67)0.1*0--*1 (6)01*1 (2)01*1 (9)01*2 (6)0-
Absence; n (%)70 (96)18 (26)40 (100)26 (65)16 (94)3 (19)40 (98)7 (17)10 (91)1 (10)34 (94)0
MPL mutation
Presence; n (%)2 (3)1 (50)0.4*1 (3)1 (100)1*1 (6)013 (7)1 (33)0.4*1 (9)014 (11)0-
Absence; n (%)71 (97)19 (27)39 (97)25 (64)16 (94)3 (19)38 (93)6 (16)10 (91)1 (10)32 (89)0
Triple-negative
Presence; n (%)3 (4)00.54 (10)0 0.01 *1 (6)013 (7)01*2 (18)015 (14)0-
Absence; n (%)70 (96)20 (29)36 (90)26 (72)16 (94)3 (19)38 (93)7 (18)9 (82)1 (11)31 (86)0
ASXL1 mutation
Presence; n (%)33 (45)13 (40)0.0620 (50)13 (65)17 (41)00.220 (49)3 (15)13 (27)0119 (53)0-
Absence; n (%)40 (55)7 (17)20 (50)13 (65)10 (59)3 (30)21 (51)4 (19)8 (73)1 (12)17 (47)0
SRSF2 mutation
Presence; n (%)15 (21)7 (47)0.113 (32)7 (54)0.43 (18)1 (33)0.410 (24)00.1*0--4 (11)0-
Absence; n (%)58 (79)13 (22)27 (68)19 (70)19 (82)2 (14)31 (76)7 (23)11 (100)1 (9)32 (89)0
EZH2 mutation
Presence; n (%)3 (4)1 (33)1*0--*1 (6)01*2 (5)01*1 (9)013 (8)0-
Absence; n (%)70 (96)19 (27)40 (100)26 (65)16 (94)3 (19)39 (95)7 (18)10 (91)1 (10)33 (92)0
IDH1 mutation
Presence; n (%)3 (3)2 (67)0.1*1 (2)1 (100)1*0--*0--*0--*2 (6)0-
Absence; n (%)70 (97)18 (26)39 (98)25 (64)17 (100)3 (18)41 (100)7 (17)11 (100)1 (9)34 (94)0
IDH2 mutation
Presence; n (%)4 (5)00.5*1 (2)00.3*0--3 (7)01*0--3 (8)0-
Absence; n (%)69 (95)20 (29)39 (98)26 (67)17 (100)3 (18)38 (93)7 (18)11 (100)1 (9)33 (92)0
U2AF1 Q157
Presence; n (%)4 (5)00.5*1 (2)00.3*1 (6)016 (15)00.5*1 (9)1 (100)0.094 (11)0-
Absence; n (%)69 (95)20 (29)39 (98)26 (67)16 (94)3 (19)35 (85)7 (20)10 (91)032 (89)0
High molecular risk mutations
Presence; n (%)46 (63)17 (37) 0.02 26 (65)15 (58)0.210 (59)1 (10)0.530 (73)3 (10)0.065 (45)1 (20)0.423 (64)0-
Absence; n (%)27 (37)3 (11)14 (35)11 (79)7 (41)2 (29)11 (27)4 (36)6 (55)013 (36)0

The values in bold indicate a significant P value ( < 0.05)

The values preceded by asterisk indicate an insufficient number of patients in the sample ( ≤ 2)

JAK2 Janus kinase 2, CALR Calreticulin, MPL MPL proto-oncogene, ASXL1 additional sex combs like 1, SRSF2 Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2, U2AF1 U2small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, EZH2 enhancer of zeste homolog 2, IDH1/2 isocitrate dehydrogenase ½, HU Hydroxyurea, IFN-α Interferon α, IMiDs Immuno-Modulating Drugs, ESAs Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents

Table 2

Predictors of anemia response to specific drugs in patients with primary myelofibrosis receiving these agents as first-line treatment

Baseline characteristicsHU (n = 38)Response (n; %)P valueJAK2 inhibitors (n = 18)Response (n; %)P valueIFN-α (n = 16)Response (n; %)P valueIMiDs (n = 50)Response (n; %)P valueAndrogens (n = 18)Response (n; %)P valueESAs (n = 54)Response (n; %)P value
Age
>70 years; n (%)8 (21)1 (12)15 (28)2 (40)1*2 (12)0115 (30)7 (47)16 (33)1 (17)0.621 (39)12 (57)1
≤70 years; n (%)30 (79)5 (17)13 (72)5 (38)14 (88)3 (21)35 (70)15 (43)12 (67)5 (42)33 (61)20 (61)
Sex
Males; n (%)21 (55)3 (14)111 (61)3 (27)0.37 (44)00.235 (70)14 (40)0.514 (78)4 (29)0.533 (61)19 (58)0.7
Females; n (%)17 (45)3 (18)7 (39)4 (57)9 (56)3 (33)15 (30)8 (53)4 (22)2 (50)21 (39)13 (62)
Moderate/severe anemia (sex-adjusted)
Presence; n (%)21 (55)4 (19)0.69 (50)4 (44)19 (56)00.0644 (81)20 (45)0.616 (89)6 (37)0.539 (74)20 (51)0.1
Absence; n (%)17 (45)2 (12)9 (50)3 (33)7 (44)3 (43)6 (19)2 (33)*2 (11)014 (26)11 (79)
Transfusion dependency
Presence; n (%)13 (34)2 (15)17 (39)3 (43)17 (44)00.234 (68)15 (44)19 (50)3 (33)125 (46)10 (40) 0.01
Absence; n (%)25 (66)4 (16)11 (61)4 (36)9 (56)3 (33)16 (32)7 (44)9 (50)3 (33)29 (54)22 (76)
Platelets
<100 × 109/L; n (%)6 (16)00.55 (28)1 (20)0.54 (25)1 (25)115 (30)9 (60)0.26 (33)1 (17)0.611 (20)5 (45)0.3
≥100 × 109/L; n (%)32 (84)6 (19)13 (72)6 (46)12 (75)2 (17)35 (70)13 (37)12 (67)5 (42)43 (80)27 (63)
Leukocytes
>25 × 109/L; n (%)8 (21)1 (12)13 (17)00.23 (19)2 (67)0.07*1 (2)013 (17)1 (33)17 (13)4 (57)1
≤25 × 109/L; n (%)30 (79)5 (17)15 (83)7 (47)13 (81)1 (8)49 (98)22 (45)15 (83)5 (33)46 (87)27 (59)
Circulating blasts
≥2%; n (%)8 (21)00.36 (35)1 (17)0.37 (44)00.213 (26)3 (23)0.16 (33)3 (50)0.315 (28)8 (53)0.7
<2%; n (%)30 (79)6 (20)11 (65)5 (45)9 (56)3 (33)37 (74)19 (51)12 (67)3 (25)39 (72)24 (62)
Constitutional symptoms
Presence; n (%)13 (34)3 (23)0.36 (33)3 (50)0.63 (19)0115 (30)6 (40)0.75 (28)1 (20)0.617 (31)10 (59)1
Absence; n (%)25 (66)3 (12)12 (67)4 (33)13 (81)3 (23)35 (70)16 (46)13 (72)5 (38)37 (69)22 (59)
Palpable splenomegaly
Presence; n (%)30 (79)5 (17)112 (67)7 (58) 0 0.03 13 (81)3 (23) 0139 (78)17 (44)112 (71)4 (33)139 (72)23 (59)1
Absence; n (%)8 (21)1 (12)6 (33)3 (19)11 (22)5 (45)5 (29)1 (20)15 (28)9 (60)
Favorable karyotype
Presence; n (%)26 (68)3 (12)0.315 (83)5 (33)0.514 (88)3 (21)135 (70)15 (43)115 (83)4 (27)0.244 (81)27 (61)0.7
Absence; n (%)12 (32)3 (25)3 (27)2 (67)*2 (12)015 (30)7 (47)3 (17)2 (67)10 (19)5 (50)
Unfavorable karyotype
Presence; n (%)7 (18)2 (29)0.33 (17)2 (67)0.5*0--11 (22)5 (45)1*2 (11)1 (50)17 (13)4 (57)1
Absence; n (%)31 (82)4 (13)15 (83)5 (33)16 (100)3 (19)39 (78)17 (44)16 (89)5 (31)47 (87)28 (60)
VHR karyotype
Presence; n (%)5 (13)1 (20)1*0--*2 (12)014 (8)2 (50)1*1 (6)1 (100)0.33 (6)1 (33)0.5
Absence; n (%)33 (87)5 (15)18 (100)7 (39)14 (88)3 (21)46 (92)20 (43)17 (94)5 (29)51 (94)31 (61)
JAK2 mutationv
Presence; n (%)23 (61)4 (17)112 (67)4 (33)0.69 (56)2 (22)129 (58)14 (48)0.58 (44)1 (12)0.131 (57)16 (52)0.2
Absence; n (%)15 (39)2 (13)6 (33)3 (50)7 (44)1 (14)21 (42)8 (38)10 (56)5 (50)23 (43)16 (70)
CALR type-1/like mutation
Presence; n (%)8 (21)2 (25)0.53 (17)1 (33)15 (31)1 (20)113 (26)4 (31)0.2*2 (11)1 (50)17 (13)4 (57)1
Absence; n (%)30 (79)4 (13)15 (83)6 (40)11 (69)2 (18)37 (74)18 (49)16 (89)5 (31)47 (87)28 (60)
CALR type-2/like mutation
Presence; n (%)*2 (5)01*--*1 (6)01*0--*1 (6)1 (100)0.33 (6)2 (67)1
Absence; n (%)36 (95)6 (17)18 (100)7 (39)15 (94)3 (20)50 (100)22 (44)17 (94)5 (29)51 (94)30 (59)
MPL mutation
Presence; n (%)*2 (5)01*1 (6)01*1 (6)014 (8)2 (50)13 (17)1 (33)16 (11)4 (67)1
Absence; n (%)36 (95)6 (17)17 (94)7 (41)15 (94)3 (20)46 (92)20 (43)15 (83)5 (33)48 (89)28 (58)
Triple-negative
Presence; n (%)3 (8)01*2 (11)2 (100)0.1*0--4 (8)2 (50)14 (22)2 (50)0.57 (13)6 (86)0.2
Absence; n (%)35 (92)6 (17)16 (89)5 (31)16 (100)3 (19)46 (92)20 (43)14 (78)4 (29)47 (87)26 (55)
ASXL1 mutation
Presence; n (%)17 (45)1 (6)0.99 (50)2 (22)0.38 (50)1 (12)121 (42)8 (38)0.54 (22)2 (50)0.523 (43)14 (61)1
Absence; n (%)21 (55)5 (24)9 (50)5 (56)8 (50)2 (25)29 (58)14 (48)14 (78)4 (29)31 (57)18 (58)
SRSF2 mutation
Presence; n (%)9 (24)2 (22)0.66 (33)2 (33)1*2 (12)018 (16)4 (50)0.7*0--6 (11)4 (67)1
Absence; n (%)29 (76)4 (14)12 (67)5 (42)14 (88)3 (21)42 (84)18 (43)18 (100)6 (33)48 (89)28 (58)
EZH2 mutation
Presence; n (%)5 (13)00.5*0--*1 (6)1 (100)0.1*1 (2)01*2 (11)1 (50)13 (6)2 (67)1
Absence; n (%)33 (87)6 (18)18 (100)7 (39)15 (94)2 (13)49 (98)22 (45)16 (89)5 (31)51 (94)30 (59)
IDH1 mutation
Presence; n (%)*2 (5)1 (50)0.2*0- 7 (39)-*0--*0--*0--*2 (4)1 (50)1
Absence; n (%)36 (95)5 (14)18 (100)16 (100)3 (19)50 (100)22 (44)18 (100)6 (33)52 (96)31 (60)
IDH2 mutation
Presence; n (%)3 (8)01*1 (6)1 (100)0.3*0--*2 (4)1 (50)1*0--3 (6)2 (67)1
Absence; n (%)35 (92)6 (17)17 (94)6 (35)16 (100)3 (19)48 (96)21 (44)18 (100)6 (33)51 (94)30 (59)
U2AF1 Q157
Presence; n (%)3 (8)01*1 (6)01*0--8 (16)3 (37)14 (22)1 (25)19 (17)5 (56)1
Absence; n (%)35 (92)6 (17)17 (94)7 (41)16 (100)3 (19)42 (84)19 (45)14 (78)5 (36)45 (83)27 (60)
High molecular risk mutations
Presence; n (%)24 (63)3 (12)0.612 (67)4 (33)0.610 (62)2 (20)131 (62)11 (35)0.17 (39)3 (43)0.631 (57)19 (61)0.7
Absence; n (%)14 (37)3 (21)6 (33)3 (50)6 (38)1 (17)19 (38)11 (58)11 (61)3 (27)23 (43)13 (57)

The values in bold indicate a significant P value ( < 0.05)

The values preceded by asterisk indicate an insufficient number of patients in the sample ( ≤ 2)

JAK2 Janus kinase 2 CALR Calreticulin MPL MPL proto-oncogene, ASXL1 additional sex combs like 1, SRSF2 Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2, U2AF1 U2small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, EZH2 enhancer of zeste homolog 2, IDH1/2 isocitrate dehydrogenase ½, HU Hydroxyurea, IFN-α Interferon α, IMiDs Immuno-Modulating Drugs, ESAs Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents

Predictors of spleen response to specific drugs in patients with primary myelofibrosis receiving these agents as first-line treatment The values in bold indicate a significant P value ( < 0.05) The values preceded by asterisk indicate an insufficient number of patients in the sample ( ≤ 2) JAK2 Janus kinase 2, CALR Calreticulin, MPL MPL proto-oncogene, ASXL1 additional sex combs like 1, SRSF2 Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2, U2AF1 U2small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, EZH2 enhancer of zeste homolog 2, IDH1/2 isocitrate dehydrogenase ½, HU Hydroxyurea, IFN-α Interferon α, IMiDs Immuno-Modulating Drugs, ESAs Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents Predictors of anemia response to specific drugs in patients with primary myelofibrosis receiving these agents as first-line treatment The values in bold indicate a significant P value ( < 0.05) The values preceded by asterisk indicate an insufficient number of patients in the sample ( ≤ 2) JAK2 Janus kinase 2 CALR Calreticulin MPL MPL proto-oncogene, ASXL1 additional sex combs like 1, SRSF2 Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2, U2AF1 U2small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1, EZH2 enhancer of zeste homolog 2, IDH1/2 isocitrate dehydrogenase ½, HU Hydroxyurea, IFN-α Interferon α, IMiDs Immuno-Modulating Drugs, ESAs Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents Spleen response to HU was more likely in the presence of ASXL1 (40% vs 17%; p = 0.06) or SRSF2 (47% vs 22%; p = 0.1) mutations, while none of eight patients with either U2AF1Q157 or IDH2 mutations responded, none of five patients with VHR karyotype, and only one (9%) of 11 patients with platelet count < 100 × 109/l responded. Anemia responses to HU were infrequent. Overall response rate to HU was predicted by the absence of U2AF1Q157 mutations (64% vs 0%; p = 0.007). Spleen response to JAK2 inhibitors was more likely in female patients (87% vs 50%; p = 0.01), absence of triple-negative mutational status (72% vs 0%; p = 0.01), and presence of CALR type 1/like mutations (90% vs 57%; p = 0.06). ASXL1 (65% vs 65%; p = 1.0) or SRSF2 (54% vs 70%; p = 0.4) mutations did not influence spleen response to JAK2 inhibitors. Anemia responses to JAK2 inhibitors were largely unpredictable. In order to further verify the aforementioned-observed associations, we accessed data from a previous formal clinical trial of momelotinib (JAK2 inhibitor). Data from this trial showed that among 91 evaluable patients, spleen response was higher in the presence of CALR mutations (73% vs 37%; p = 0.009) and female sex (49% vs 39%, p = NS). Although significant differences were not apparent, spleen response to IFN-α was unlikely in the presence of ≥ 2% circulating blasts (none of six patients responded) or presence of ASXL1 mutations (none of seven patients responded). IFN-α was often ineffective for the treatment of anemia. Spleen responses to treatment with IMiDs, androgens, or ESAs were unusual, while anemia response to all three agents was not predicted by either genetic or clinical markers. Our observations, which require additional examination in a prospective setting, show a limited value of genetic and clinical markers in predicting response to currently available drugs for PMF (consistent with the non-specific mechanism of action for these drugs). The study also confirmed the possibility that CALR mutations and female sex predict favorable spleen response to JAK2 inhibitors and suggest U2AF1Q157 mutations predict unfavorable spleen response to HU, as previously proposed in formal clinical trials. Supplementary table
  15 in total

1.  MIPSS70+ Version 2.0: Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Paola Guglielmelli; Terra L Lasho; Naseema Gangat; Rhett P Ketterling; Animesh Pardanani; Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Targeted deep sequencing in primary myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Terra L Lasho; Christy M Finke; Yoseph Elala; Curtis A Hanson; Rhett P Ketterling; Naseema Gangat; Animesh Pardanani
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2016-11-30

3.  Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Francisco Cervantes; Ruben Mesa; Francesco Passamonti; Srdan Verstovsek; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Jason Gotlib; Brigitte Dupriez; Animesh Pardanani; Claire Harrison; Ronald Hoffman; Heinz Gisslinger; Nicolaus Kröger; Juergen Thiele; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  The burden of fatigue and quality of life in myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs): an international Internet-based survey of 1179 MPD patients.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; Joyce Niblack; Martha Wadleigh; Srdan Verstovsek; John Camoriano; Sunni Barnes; Angelina D Tan; Pamela J Atherton; Jeff A Sloan; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Jüergen Thiele; Daniel A Arber; Richard D Brunning; Michael J Borowitz; Anna Porwit; Nancy Lee Harris; Michelle M Le Beau; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Ayalew Tefferi; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Primary myelofibrosis: 2013 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 7.  The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber; Attilio Orazi; Robert Hasserjian; Jürgen Thiele; Michael J Borowitz; Michelle M Le Beau; Clara D Bloomfield; Mario Cazzola; James W Vardiman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Long-term survival and blast transformation in molecularly annotated essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Paola Guglielmelli; Dirk R Larson; Christy Finke; Emnet A Wassie; Lisa Pieri; Naseema Gangat; Rajmonda Fjerza; Alem A Belachew; Terra L Lasho; Rhett P Ketterling; Curtis A Hanson; Alessandro Rambaldi; Guido Finazzi; Juergen Thiele; Tiziano Barbui; Animesh Pardanani; Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant overcomes the adverse survival effect of very high risk and unfavorable karyotype in myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Daniel K Partain; Jeanne M Palmer; James L Slack; Vivek Roy; William J Hogan; Mark L Litzow; Rhett P Ketterling; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 10.  The 2016 WHO classification and diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms: document summary and in-depth discussion.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Jürgen Thiele; Heinz Gisslinger; Hans Michael Kvasnicka; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Paola Guglielmelli; Attilio Orazi; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 11.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.