Hazel J Evans 1 , Catherine M Hill 1,2 , Ruth N Kingshott 3 , Florian Gahleitner 1 , Heather E Elphick 3 , Paul Gringras 4 , Michael Farquhar 4 , Ruth M Pickering 2 , Jane Martin 5 , Janine Reynolds 3 , Anna Joyce 4 , Johanna C Gavlak 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rates of home cardiorespiratory polygraphy in children under investigation for sleep-disordered breathing and parent perspectives on equipment use at home. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Sheffield, Evelina London and Southampton Children's Hospitals. PATIENTS: Data are reported for 194 research participants with Down syndrome, aged 0.5-5.9 years across the three centres and 61 clinical patients aged 0.4-19.5 years from one centre, all of whom had home cardiorespiratory polygraphy including respiratory movements, nasal pressure flow, pulse oximetry, body position and motion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of home cardiorespiratory studies successfully acquiring ≥4 hours of artefact-free data at the first attempt. Parental report of ease of use of equipment and preparedness to repeat home diagnostics in the future. RESULTS: 143/194 (74%; 95% CI 67% to 79%) of research participants and 50/61 (82%; 95% CI 71% to 90%) of clinical patients had successful home cardiorespiratory polygraphy at the first attempt. Some children required multiple attempts to achieve a successful study. Overall, this equated to 1.3 studies per research participant and 1.2 studies per clinical child. The median artefact-free sleep time for successful research studies was 515 min (range 261-673) and for clinical studies 442 min (range 291-583). 84% of research and 87% of clinical parents expressed willingness to repeat home cardiorespiratory polygraphy in the future. 67% of research parents found the equipment 'easy or okay' to use, while 64% of clinical parents reported it as 'easy' or 'very easy'. CONCLUSIONS: Home cardiorespiratory polygraphy offers an acceptable approach to the assessment of sleep-disordered breathing in children. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rates of home cardiorespiratory polygraphy in children under investigation for sleep-disordered breathing and parent perspectives on equipment use at home. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Sheffield, Evelina London and Southampton Children 's Hospitals. PATIENTS : Data are reported for 194 research participants with Down syndrome, aged 0.5-5.9 years across the three centres and 61 clinical patients aged 0.4-19.5 years from one centre, all of whom had home cardiorespiratory polygraphy including respiratory movements, nasal pressure flow, pulse oximetry, body position and motion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of home cardiorespiratory studies successfully acquiring ≥4 hours of artefact-free data at the first attempt. Parental report of ease of use of equipment and preparedness to repeat home diagnostics in the future. RESULTS: 143/194 (74%; 95% CI 67% to 79%) of research participants and 50/61 (82%; 95% CI 71% to 90%) of clinical patients had successful home cardiorespiratory polygraphy at the first attempt. Some children required multiple attempts to achieve a successful study. Overall, this equated to 1.3 studies per research participant and 1.2 studies per clinical child . The median artefact-free sleep time for successful research studies was 515 min (range 261-673) and for clinical studies 442 min (range 291-583). 84% of research and 87% of clinical parents expressed willingness to repeat home cardiorespiratory polygraphy in the future. 67% of research parents found the equipment 'easy or okay' to use, while 64% of clinical parents reported it as 'easy' or 'very easy'. CONCLUSIONS: Home cardiorespiratory polygraphy offers an acceptable approach to the assessment of sleep-disordered breathing in children . © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
cardiorespiratory polygraphy; home; obstructive sleep apnoea; screening; sleep-disordered breathing
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2018
PMID： 30455364 DOI： 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Dis Child ISSN： 0003-9888 Impact factor: 3.791