Literature DB >> 30454867

Functional Safe Zone Is Superior to the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Why the Lewinnek Safe Zone Is Not Always Predictive of Stability.

Taro Tezuka1, Nathanael D Heckmann2, Russell J Bodner3, Lawrence D Dorr4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Lewinnek "safe zone" is not always predictive of stability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent studies have focused on functional hip motion as observed on lateral spine-pelvis-hip x-rays. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between the Lewinnek safe zone and the functional safe zone based on hip and pelvic motion in the sagittal plane.
METHODS: Three hundred twenty hips (291 patients) underwent primary THA using computer navigation. Two hundred ninety-six of these hips (92.5%) were within the Lewinnek safe zone as determined by inclination of 40° ± 10° and anteversion of 15° ± 10°. All patients had preoperative and postoperative standing and sitting lateral spinopelvic x-rays. The combined sagittal index (CSI), a combination of sagittal acetabular and femoral position, was measured for each patient and used to assess the functional safe zone. Data analysis was performed to identify hips in the Lewinnek safe zone inside and outside the sagittal functional safe zone. Predictive factors for hips outside the functional safe zone were identified.
RESULTS: Of the 296 hips within the Lewinnek safe zone, 254 (85.8%) were also in the functional safe zone. Forty-two patients were outside the functional safe zone based on CSI; 19 had an increased standing CSI and 23 had a decreased sitting CSI, all were considered at risk for dislocation. Predictive factors for falling outside the functional safe zone were increased femoral mobility (P < .001, r = 0.632), decreased spinopelvic mobility (P < .001, r = 0.455), and pelvic incidence (P < .001, r = 0.400).
CONCLUSION: In this study, 14.2% of hips within the Lewinnek safe zone were outside the functional safe zone, identifying a potential reason hips dislocate despite having "normal" cup angles. The best predictor for falling outside the functional safe zone, both preoperatively and postoperatively, was femoral mobility, not the sagittal cup position (ie, cup anteinclination). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective review.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lewinnek safe zone; combined sagittal index; dislocation; femoral motion; functional hip motion; spinopelvic motion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30454867     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  45 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Factors Are Associated With Neck Fracture in One Commonly Used Bimodular THA Design? A Multicenter, Nationwide Study in Slovenia.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Implications of Spinopelvic Mobility on Total Hip Arthroplasty: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  John D Attenello; Jeffery K Harpstrite
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2019-11

3.  Risk factors of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi; Ehsan Ghadimi; Mohammad Vahedian Ardakani; Mohammadreza Razzaghof; Mohammad Ali Ghasemi; Ali Nili; Ali Vafaei; Alireza Moharrami; Sheila Rasta
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acetabular and Femoral Component Positioning Using Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Arghya Kundu Choudhury; Souvik Paul; Tushar Gupta; Lakshmana Das
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Cup positioning and its effect on polyethylene wear of vitamin E- and non-vitamin E-supplemented liners in total hip arthroplasty: radiographic outcome at 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Josef Baghdadi; Shareef Alkhateeb; Alexander Roth; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  [Comparative study of intra- and post-operative inclination and anteversion angles of acetabular cup in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  Run Tian; Yutian Lei; Kunzheng Wang; Pei Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

7.  Does fusion length matter? Total hip arthroplasty dislocation after extension of lumbosacral fusion: a case report.

Authors:  Daniel Alsoof; Christopher L McDonald; Matthew Kovoor; Bassel G Diebo; Eren O Kuris; Valentin Antoci; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-08-03

8.  A Modeling Study of a Patient-specific Safe Zone for THA: Calculation, Validation, and Key Factors Based on Standing and Sitting Sagittal Pelvic Tilt.

Authors:  Hao Tang; Ya Li; Yixin Zhou; Siyuang Wang; Yongqiang Zhao; Zhuyi Ma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Low dislocation rates with the use of patient specific "Safe zones" in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abhinav K Sharma; Zlatan Cizmic; Douglas A Dennis; Stefan W Kreuzer; Michael A Miranda; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-21

10.  Well-Placed Acetabular Component Oriented Outside the Safe Zone During Weight-Bearing Daily Activities.

Authors:  Nan Zheng; Xiangjun Hu; Dimitris Dimitriou; Kerong Dai; Tao Guo; Tsung-Yuan Tsai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.