Clive J Petry1, Ken K Ong2,3,4, Ieuan A Hughes2, Carlo L Acerini2, David B Dunger2,4. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 116, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. cjp1002@cam.ac.uk. 2. Department of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 116, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. 3. Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. 4. The Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previously we found that certain fetal imprinted genes represented as an allele score are associated with maternal pregnancy glucose concentrations. Recently it was reported that fetal polymorphisms with strong associations with birth weight tend to mediate these independently of increases in maternal pregnancy glucose concentrations. We therefore investigated whether potential associations between the fetal allele score and birth weight were related to maternal glucose concentrations in the Cambridge Baby Growth Study. RESULTS: The fetal imprinted gene allele score was positively associated with birth weight (β = 63 (17-109) g/risk allele, β' = 0.113, p = 7.6 × 10-3, n = 405). This association was partially attenuated by adjusting for maternal glucose concentrations (β = 50 (4-95) g/risk allele, β' = 0.089, p = 0.03, n = 405). The allele score was also positively associated with risk of being large for gestational age at birth (odds ratio 1.60 (1.19-2.15) per risk allele, p = 2.1 × 10-3, n = 660) and negatively associated with risk of being small for gestational age at birth (odds ratio 0.65 (0.44-0.96) per risk allele, p = 0.03, n = 660). The large for gestational age at birth association was also partially attenuated by maternal glucose concentrations. These results suggest that associations between the fetal imprinted gene allele score and size at birth are mediated through both glucose-dependent and glucose-independent mechanisms.
OBJECTIVE: Previously we found that certain fetal imprinted genes represented as an allele score are associated with maternal pregnancy glucose concentrations. Recently it was reported that fetal polymorphisms with strong associations with birth weight tend to mediate these independently of increases in maternal pregnancy glucose concentrations. We therefore investigated whether potential associations between the fetal allele score and birth weight were related to maternal glucose concentrations in the Cambridge Baby Growth Study. RESULTS: The fetal imprinted gene allele score was positively associated with birth weight (β = 63 (17-109) g/risk allele, β' = 0.113, p = 7.6 × 10-3, n = 405). This association was partially attenuated by adjusting for maternal glucose concentrations (β = 50 (4-95) g/risk allele, β' = 0.089, p = 0.03, n = 405). The allele score was also positively associated with risk of being large for gestational age at birth (odds ratio 1.60 (1.19-2.15) per risk allele, p = 2.1 × 10-3, n = 660) and negatively associated with risk of being small for gestational age at birth (odds ratio 0.65 (0.44-0.96) per risk allele, p = 0.03, n = 660). The large for gestational age at birth association was also partially attenuated by maternal glucose concentrations. These results suggest that associations between the fetal imprinted gene allele score and size at birth are mediated through both glucose-dependent and glucose-independent mechanisms.
Fetal exposure to glucose is thought to be one of the principal stimulators of growth in utero [1-3]. It is believed that glucose-stimulated fetal insulin secretion stimulates growth whether or not pregnancies are affected by diabetes [4]. Indeed particularly prior to the third trimester of pregnancy when its glucoregulatory function develops, the principal roles of fetal insulin are both mitogenic and anabolic, such as enhancing the growth of white adipocytes and stimulating triglyceride production and deposition in them [5].Genetics can have roles in regulating both maternal glucose concentrations in pregnancy and fetal growth expressed as offspring birth weight. We recently reported associations between fetal imprinted genes represented as an allele score and both gestational diabetes and maternal glucose concentrations in late pregnancy [6]. In a birth weight-related genome wide association study (GWAS) Beaumont et al. [7] recently reported certain maternal polymorphic variants that were associated with offspring birth weights where the equivalent fetal variants were not. In contrast certain other variants were associated with offspring birth weight in both the maternal and fetal genes. Interestingly all these maternal variants, where the fetal equivalent were not associated with offspring birth weights, were also associated with maternal glucose concentrations in pregnancy [7]. A subsequent study found that a gene score constructed using the principal fetal birth weight variants (from [8]) was strongly associated with birth weights independently of effects of maternal glucose concentrations [9]. The authors of this study concluded that for any level of maternal glucose concentration fetal genetics has a major impact on growth but acts predominantly through mechanisms independent of maternal glucose. However none of the fetal variants used to construct the gene score in this study were independently associated with maternal glucose concentrations. In the current study we therefore examined relationships between our fetal imprinted gene allele score and measures of size at birth, in particular investigating whether any allele score associations with size at birth appear to be attenuated by maternal glucose concentrations in pregnancy.
Main text
Methods
Cambridge baby growth study
The first phase of the prospective, longitudinal Cambridge Baby Growth Study recruited mothers (and their partners and offspring) attending early pregnancy ultrasound clinics at the Rosie Maternity Hospital, Cambridge, UK between the years 2001–2009 [6, 10]. At around 28 weeks of gestation the mothers underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after fasting overnight. Plasma glucose concentrations were measured using a standard glucose oxidase-based procedure on samples collected when fasting and 60 min after the consumption of the glucose load. Offspring birth weight and gestational age at birth data were collected from hospital notes. Large for gestational age (LGA) at birth was defined as being in the top decile for birth weight adjusted for gestational age. Similarly small for gestational age at birth (SGA) was defined as being in the bottom decile. In this cohort 96.9% of the offspring were Caucasian, 0.8% were mixed race, 0.6% were Afro-Caribbean, 0.8% were Oriental and 0.9% were Indo-Asian. The current analysis was restricted to pregnancies where both fasting and 60 min OGTT glucose concentrations were available.
Genotyping and fetal allele score formulation
Blood or mouth swab samples for DNA extraction were collected from 845 family (mother, father and baby) trios of the 1074 families where maternal OGTT data were available. Genomic DNA was extracted from these samples using an Autopure LS Machine (Qiagen Ltd., Crawley, UK). Allelic transmission to the fetus was imputed from the DNA family trio genotypes [6, 10], with the genotyping performed using Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR assays (by LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK). The genotypes that were used in this study were all consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05 using the χ2 test) and had a repeat genotyping discordancy rate of < 1.0%. The unweighted fetal allele score was formulated as previously described [6] using the fetal paternally-transmitted INS-IGF2rs10770125 and rs2585, and maternally-transmitted KCNQ1rs231841 and rs7929804 alleles.
Statistical analysis
Associations with offspring birth weight were tested using linear regression, adjusted for established co-variates. Associations with LGA and SGA were tested using both logistic and linear regression. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant throughout. Data are mean (95% confidence interval) unless stated otherwise.
Results
Associations with offspring birth weight
The covariates in the regression models (gestational age at birth, sex, parity, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, pregnancy weight gain and maternal smoking during pregnancy) explained 31.5% of the variance in the offspring birth weights by themselves. OGTT fasting glucose concentrations were significantly associated with offspring birth weights when added to the model (β = 0.16 (0.09–0.23) g l/mmol, β′ = 0.150, p = 1.5 × 10−5, n = 609), as were OGTT 60 min glucose concentrations (β = 0.05 (0.03, 0.07) g l/mmol, β′ = 0.161, p = 4.4 × 10−6, n = 602). The fetal allele score was also positively associated with birth weight (β = 63 (17–109) g/risk allele, β′ = 0.113, p = 7.6 × 10−3, n = 405) (Fig. 1). This association was partially attenuated when adjusting for the OGTT fasting and 60 min glucose concentrations (β = 50 (4–95) g/risk allele, β′ = 0.089, p = 0.03, n = 405), shown by the flatter slope of the predicted line of best fit of the model (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Linear fit prediction plots showing the relationships between the fetal allele score and standardised birth weight residuals (after adjustment for gestational age at birth, sex, parity, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, pregnancy weight gain and maternal smoking during pregnancy). The plots are shown with and without further adjustment for maternal OGTT glucose concentrations, this adjustment flattening the slope
Linear fit prediction plots showing the relationships between the fetal allele score and standardised birth weight residuals (after adjustment for gestational age at birth, sex, parity, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, pregnancy weight gain and maternal smoking during pregnancy). The plots are shown with and without further adjustment for maternal OGTT glucose concentrations, this adjustment flattening the slope
Associations with being large or small for gestational age at birth
The fetal allele score was positively associated with risk of being LGA [odds ratio (OR) 1.60 (1.19–2.15) per risk allele, p = 2.1 × 10−3] (Fig. 2a). The association was only partially attenuated by adjusting for OGTT fasting and 60 min glucose concentrations [OR 1.47 (1.09–1.98) per risk allele, p = 0.01)]. The fetal allele score was also negatively associated with risk of being SGA [OR 0.65 (0.44–0.96) per risk allele, p = 0.03] (Fig. 2b). The association was not attenuated when adjusting for OGTT fasting and 60 min glucose concentrations [OR 0.67 (0.49–0.99) per risk allele, p = 0.04].
Fig. 2
The fetal allele score in those born (a) LGA or (b) SGA and those not born LGA/SGA, with and without adjustment for maternal OGTT glucose concentrations. Data are means (95% confidence intervals)
The fetal allele score in those born (a) LGA or (b) SGA and those not born LGA/SGA, with and without adjustment for maternal OGTT glucose concentrations. Data are means (95% confidence intervals)
Discussion
In this study the fetal imprinted gene allele score that we had previously shown to be associated with both maternal glucose concentrations and gestational diabetes risk [6], was additionally associated with offspring birth weight and risk of being LGA or SGA. This is perhaps not surprising given the enrichment of imprinted gene regions identified in the largest birth weight-related GWAS using fetal genotypes [8]. The effect sizes were partially attenuated when the associations were further adjusted for week 28 OGTT fasting and 60 min maternal glucose concentrations, suggesting that the link between the fetal allele score and birth weight is mediated through both glucose-dependent and glucose independent mechanisms. These findings are therefore somewhat inconsistent with the associations reported by Hughes et al. [9] where their fetal gene score was associated with birth weight completely independently of maternal glucose concentrations. The difference in the results of the two studies is probably due to the way that the two fetal gene scores were formulated: that used by Hughes et al. [9] being put together from fetal polymorphisms strongly associated with birth weights and our allele score being established using fetal alleles found to be associated with maternal glucose concentrations. Whilst increased maternal glucose concentrations are known to lead to increased birth weights [4], glucose-independent pathways upregulated in gestational diabetes that could potentially affect offspring birth weight include increased placental transport of both fatty acids and certain amino acids [11, 12].The main strengths of this study are its prospective nature and the use of a novel fetal imprinted gene allele score that we found to be robustly associated with maternal glucose concentrations, even to genome wide significance levels by meta-analysis of three different birth cohorts [6]. Its conclusion is that some of the principal fetal imprinted gene variants that are associated with maternal glucose concentrations in late pregnancy in our studies (fetal paternally-transmitted INS-IGF2rs10770125 and rs2585, and maternally-transmitted KCNQ1rs231841 and rs7929804 [6, 10]), are collectively associated with birth weight through both maternal glucose-dependent and glucose-independent mechanisms.
Limitations
The study has a modest (and variable) sample size which restricted its statistical power.The lack of validation of the associations in additional cohorts.The lack of adjustment of the p-values for multiple testing.
Authors: Joyce F Sung; Elizabeth A Kogut; Henry C Lee; Jana L Mannan; Kasra Navabi; M Mark Taslimi; Yasser Y El-Sayed Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: E Parretti; F Mecacci; M Papini; R Cioni; L Carignani; M Mignosa; P La Torre; G Mello Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: María Ruiz-Palacios; Antonio José Ruiz-Alcaraz; María Sanchez-Campillo; Elvira Larqué Journal: Ann Nutr Metab Date: 2017-01-21 Impact factor: 3.374
Authors: Alice E Hughes; Michael Nodzenski; Robin N Beaumont; Octavious Talbot; Beverley M Shields; Denise M Scholtens; Bridget A Knight; William L Lowe; Andrew T Hattersley; Rachel M Freathy Journal: Diabetes Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Clive J Petry; Rachel V Seear; Dianne L Wingate; Lucy Manico; Carlo L Acerini; Ken K Ong; Ieuan A Hughes; David B Dunger Journal: Diabetes Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Robin N Beaumont; Nicole M Warrington; Alana Cavadino; Jessica Tyrrell; Michael Nodzenski; Momoko Horikoshi; Frank Geller; Ronny Myhre; Rebecca C Richmond; Lavinia Paternoster; Jonathan P Bradfield; Eskil Kreiner-Møller; Ville Huikari; Sarah Metrustry; Kathryn L Lunetta; Jodie N Painter; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Catherine Allard; Sheila J Barton; Ana Espinosa; Julie A Marsh; Catherine Potter; Ge Zhang; Wei Ang; Diane J Berry; Luigi Bouchard; Shikta Das; Hakon Hakonarson; Jani Heikkinen; Øyvind Helgeland; Berthold Hocher; Albert Hofman; Hazel M Inskip; Samuel E Jones; Manolis Kogevinas; Penelope A Lind; Letizia Marullo; Sarah E Medland; Anna Murray; Jeffrey C Murray; Pål R Njølstad; Ellen A Nohr; Christoph Reichetzeder; Susan M Ring; Katherine S Ruth; Loreto Santa-Marina; Denise M Scholtens; Sylvain Sebert; Verena Sengpiel; Marcus A Tuke; Marc Vaudel; Michael N Weedon; Gonneke Willemsen; Andrew R Wood; Hanieh Yaghootkar; Louis J Muglia; Meike Bartels; Caroline L Relton; Craig E Pennell; Leda Chatzi; Xavier Estivill; John W Holloway; Dorret I Boomsma; Grant W Montgomery; Joanne M Murabito; Tim D Spector; Christine Power; Marjo-Ritta Järvelin; Hans Bisgaard; Struan F A Grant; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Vincent W Jaddoe; Bo Jacobsson; Mads Melbye; Mark I McCarthy; Andrew T Hattersley; M Geoffrey Hayes; Timothy M Frayling; Marie-France Hivert; Janine F Felix; Elina Hyppönen; William L Lowe; David M Evans; Debbie A Lawlor; Bjarke Feenstra; Rachel M Freathy Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Momoko Horikoshi; Robin N Beaumont; Felix R Day; Nicole M Warrington; Marjolein N Kooijman; Juan Fernandez-Tajes; Bjarke Feenstra; Natalie R van Zuydam; Kyle J Gaulton; Niels Grarup; Jonathan P Bradfield; David P Strachan; Ruifang Li-Gao; Tarunveer S Ahluwalia; Eskil Kreiner; Rico Rueedi; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Diana L Cousminer; Ying Wu; Elisabeth Thiering; Carol A Wang; Christian T Have; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Natalia Vilor-Tejedor; Peter K Joshi; Eileen Tai Hui Boh; Ioanna Ntalla; Niina Pitkänen; Anubha Mahajan; Elisabeth M van Leeuwen; Raimo Joro; Vasiliki Lagou; Michael Nodzenski; Louise A Diver; Krina T Zondervan; Mariona Bustamante; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Josep M Mercader; Amanda J Bennett; Nilufer Rahmioglu; Dale R Nyholt; Ronald Ching Wan Ma; Claudia Ha Ting Tam; Wing Hung Tam; Santhi K Ganesh; Frank Ja van Rooij; Samuel E Jones; Po-Ru Loh; Katherine S Ruth; Marcus A Tuke; Jessica Tyrrell; Andrew R Wood; Hanieh Yaghootkar; Denise M Scholtens; Lavinia Paternoster; Inga Prokopenko; Peter Kovacs; Mustafa Atalay; Sara M Willems; Kalliope Panoutsopoulou; Xu Wang; Lisbeth Carstensen; Frank Geller; Katharina E Schraut; Mario Murcia; Catharina Em van Beijsterveldt; Gonneke Willemsen; Emil V R Appel; Cilius E Fonvig; Caecilie Trier; Carla Mt Tiesler; Marie Standl; Zoltán Kutalik; Sílvia Bonas-Guarch; David M Hougaard; Friman Sánchez; David Torrents; Johannes Waage; Mads V Hollegaard; Hugoline G de Haan; Frits R Rosendaal; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Susan M Ring; Gibran Hemani; George McMahon; Neil R Robertson; Christopher J Groves; Claudia Langenberg; Jian'an Luan; Robert A Scott; Jing Hua Zhao; Frank D Mentch; Scott M MacKenzie; Rebecca M Reynolds; William L Lowe; Anke Tönjes; Michael Stumvoll; Virpi Lindi; Timo A Lakka; Cornelia M van Duijn; Wieland Kiess; Antje Körner; Thorkild Ia Sørensen; Harri Niinikoski; Katja Pahkala; Olli T Raitakari; Eleftheria Zeggini; George V Dedoussis; Yik-Ying Teo; Seang-Mei Saw; Mads Melbye; Harry Campbell; James F Wilson; Martine Vrijheid; Eco Jcn de Geus; Dorret I Boomsma; Haja N Kadarmideen; Jens-Christian Holm; Torben Hansen; Sylvain Sebert; Andrew T Hattersley; Lawrence J Beilin; John P Newnham; Craig E Pennell; Joachim Heinrich; Linda S Adair; Judith B Borja; Karen L Mohlke; Johan G Eriksson; Elisabeth E Widén; Mika Kähönen; Jorma S Viikari; Terho Lehtimäki; Peter Vollenweider; Klaus Bønnelykke; Hans Bisgaard; Dennis O Mook-Kanamori; Albert Hofman; Fernando Rivadeneira; André G Uitterlinden; Charlotta Pisinger; Oluf Pedersen; Christine Power; Elina Hyppönen; Nicholas J Wareham; Hakon Hakonarson; Eleanor Davies; Brian R Walker; Vincent Wv Jaddoe; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Struan Fa Grant; Allan A Vaag; Debbie A Lawlor; Timothy M Frayling; George Davey Smith; Andrew P Morris; Ken K Ong; Janine F Felix; Nicholas J Timpson; John Rb Perry; David M Evans; Mark I McCarthy; Rachel M Freathy Journal: Nature Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 49.962