Literature DB >> 30453399

[Efficacy and associated factors of olfactory training in the treatment of olfactory dysfunction].

X G Yan1, X Gao1, Z F Sun1, Y C Guo1, L Y Yao1, J Liu1, W Xiao2, Q W Lyu1, Y X Wei1.   

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical effects and the influence factors of olfactory training in the treatment of olfactory dysfunction.
Methods: A total of 86 patients with olfactory dysfunction (49 post-infectious and 37 post-traumatic) in Beijing Anzhen Hospital during Dec 2016 to May 2017 were recruited in this prospective study. The clinical data of patients were analyzed, including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), course of disease, smoking history, drinking history, diabetes history, hypertension history, hyperlipidemia history, and anxiety visual analogue score (VAS). All patients were treated with olfactory training for 16 weeks, and all of them underwent Sniffin' Sticks olfactory test before and after treatment, which was evaluated by composite threshold-discrimination-identification score (TDI). SPSS 23.0 software, paired t test and univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the data.
Results: Eighty patients received treatment, including 46 post-infectious olfactory dysfunction and 34 post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction. After olfactory training, the total scores of TDI increased with statistically significant (18.3±8.6 vs 13.6±7.4, t=-6.158, P<0.05). The overall efficacy was 40% (32/80). The effective rate were 45.7% (21/46) in post-infectious olfactory dysfunction and 32.4% (11/34) in post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ(2)=1.441, P=0.230). Logistic regression analysis showed that the course of disease was an influence factor in the clinical curative effect (OR=0.881, 95%CI: 0.799-0.973, P=0.012). In patients with less than a year of olfactory dysfunction, the olfactory function improved obviously with the efficiency of 50.9% (29/57).
Conclusion: Sixteen weeks of olfactory training provides a significant therapeutic effect on the post-infectious and post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction, and the olfactory training can achieve better therapeutic effects at the early stage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Olfaction disorders; Olfactory training; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30453399     DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1673-0860


  3 in total

1.  Effect of early olfactory training on olfactory recovery after nasal endoscopy in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and olfactory impairment.

Authors:  Jinfeng Zhang; Yong Feng; Wei Liu; Lei He; Xiaocheng Qiao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Smell disorders in COVID-19 patients: role of olfactory training: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Tao Mei; Ying Chen; Lina Wang; Lulian Jiang; Ke Liu; Liping Zhao; Ziyu Luo; Wenxin Chi; Xiangyu Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Clinical Implications of Psychophysical Olfactory Testing: Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  Baihan Su; Benjamin Bleier; Yongxiang Wei; Dawei Wu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.