Michelle M Dynes1, Susanna Binzen2, Evelyn Twentyman3, Hannah Nguyen4, Samantha Lobis5, Nguke Mwakatundu6, Paul Chaote7, Florina Serbanescu8. 1. Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta 30341, GA, USA. Electronic address: mdynes@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta 30341, GA, USA. Electronic address: syb7@cdc.gov. 3. Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta 30341, GA, USA. Electronic address: ydj2@cdc.gov. 4. Emory University, 201 Dowman Dr, Atlanta 30322, GA, USA. Electronic address: hannah.nguyen@alumni.emory.edu. 5. Vital Strategies, 61 Broadway #1010, New York 10006, NY, USA. Electronic address: SLobis@vitalstrategies.org. 6. Thamini Uhai, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Electronic address: nmwakatundu@thaminiuhai.or.tz. 7. Regional Medical Officer, Kigoma Town, Tanzania. 8. Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta 30341, GA, USA. Electronic address: fxs7@cdc.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Labor and birth companionship is a key aspect of respectful maternity care. Lack of companionship deters women from accessing facility-based delivery care, though formal and informal policies against companionship are common in sub-Saharan African countries. AIM: To identify client and provider factors associated with labor and birth companionship DESIGN: Cross-sectional evaluation among delivery clients and providers in 61 health facilities in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, April-July 2016. METHODS: Multilevel, mixed effects logistic regression analyses were conducted on linked data from providers (n = 249) and delivery clients (n = 935). Outcome variables were Companion in labor and Companion at the time of birth. FINDINGS: Less than half of women reported having a labor companion (44.7%) and 12% reported having a birth companion. Among providers, 26.1% and 10.0% reported allowing a labor and birth companion, respectively. Clients had significantly greater odds of having a labor companion if their provider reported the following traits: working more than 55 hours/week (aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.23-4.97), feeling very satisfied with their job (aOR 3.66, 95% CI 1.36-9.85), and allowing women to have a labor companion (aOR 3.73, 95% CI 1.58-8.81). Clients had significantly lower odds of having a labor companion if their provider reported having an on-site supervisor (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.95). Clients had significantly greater odds of having a birth companion if they self-reported labor complications (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.02-7.81) and had a labor companion (aOR 44.74, 95% CI 11.99-166.91). Clients had significantly greater odds of having a birth companion if their provider attended more than 10 deliveries in the last month (aOR 3.43, 95% CI 1.08-10.96) compared to fewer deliveries. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These results suggest that health providers are the gatekeepers of companionship, and the work environment influences providers' allowance of companionship. Facilities where providers experience staff shortages and high workload may be particularly responsive to programmatic interventions that aim to increase staff acceptance of birth companionship.
BACKGROUND:Labor and birth companionship is a key aspect of respectful maternity care. Lack of companionship deters women from accessing facility-based delivery care, though formal and informal policies against companionship are common in sub-Saharan African countries. AIM: To identify client and provider factors associated with labor and birth companionship DESIGN: Cross-sectional evaluation among delivery clients and providers in 61 health facilities in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, April-July 2016. METHODS: Multilevel, mixed effects logistic regression analyses were conducted on linked data from providers (n = 249) and delivery clients (n = 935). Outcome variables were Companion in labor and Companion at the time of birth. FINDINGS: Less than half of women reported having a labor companion (44.7%) and 12% reported having a birth companion. Among providers, 26.1% and 10.0% reported allowing a labor and birth companion, respectively. Clients had significantly greater odds of having a labor companion if their provider reported the following traits: working more than 55 hours/week (aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.23-4.97), feeling very satisfied with their job (aOR 3.66, 95% CI 1.36-9.85), and allowing women to have a labor companion (aOR 3.73, 95% CI 1.58-8.81). Clients had significantly lower odds of having a labor companion if their provider reported having an on-site supervisor (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.95). Clients had significantly greater odds of having a birth companion if they self-reported labor complications (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.02-7.81) and had a labor companion (aOR 44.74, 95% CI 11.99-166.91). Clients had significantly greater odds of having a birth companion if their provider attended more than 10 deliveries in the last month (aOR 3.43, 95% CI 1.08-10.96) compared to fewer deliveries. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These results suggest that health providers are the gatekeepers of companionship, and the work environment influences providers' allowance of companionship. Facilities where providers experience staff shortages and high workload may be particularly responsive to programmatic interventions that aim to increase staff acceptance of birth companionship.