Katarzyna P Sokol1, William E Robinson1, Ana R Oliveira2, Julien Warnan1, Marc M Nowaczyk3, Adrian Ruff4, Inês A C Pereira2, Erwin Reisner1. 1. Department of Chemistry , University of Cambridge , Lensfield Road , Cambridge CB2 1EW , U.K. 2. Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (ITQB NOVA) , Universidade NOVA de Lisboa , Av. da República , 2780-157 Oeiras , Portugal. 3. Plant Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology & Biotechnology , Ruhr-Universität Bochum , Universitätsstraße 150 , 44780 Bochum , Germany. 4. Analytical Chemistry - Center for Electrochemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Ruhr-Universität Bochum , Universitätsstraße 150 , 44780 Bochum , Germany.
Abstract
Solar-driven coupling of water oxidation with CO2 reduction sustains life on our planet and is of high priority in contemporary energy research. Here, we report a photoelectrochemical tandem device that performs photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate. We employ a semi-artificial design, which wires a W-dependent formate dehydrogenase (FDH) cathode to a photoanode containing the photosynthetic water oxidation enzyme, Photosystem II, via a synthetic dye with complementary light absorption. From a biological perspective, the system achieves a metabolically inaccessible pathway of light-driven CO2 fixation to formate. From a synthetic point of view, it represents a proof-of-principle system utilizing precious-metal-free catalysts for selective CO2-to-formate conversion using water as an electron donor. This hybrid platform demonstrates the translatability and versatility of coupling abiotic and biotic components to create challenging models for solar fuel and chemical synthesis.
Solar-driven coupling of water oxidation with CO2 reduction sustains life on our planet and is of high priority in contemporary energy research. Here, we report a photoelectrochemical tandem device that performs photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate. We employ a semi-artificial design, which wires a W-dependent formate dehydrogenase (FDH) cathode to a photoanode containing the photosynthetic water oxidation enzyme, Photosystem II, via a synthetic dye with complementary light absorption. From a biological perspective, the system achieves a metabolically inaccessible pathway of light-driven CO2 fixation to formate. From a synthetic point of view, it represents a proof-of-principle system utilizing precious-metal-free catalysts for selective CO2-to-formate conversion using water as an electron donor. This hybrid platform demonstrates the translatability and versatility of coupling abiotic and biotic components to create challenging models for solar fuel and chemical synthesis.
In the thylakoid membrane of
plants, light-driven water oxidation in the photosynthetic Z-scheme
is coupled to CO2 fixation for sugar synthesis via the
dark Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle (eq ).[1,2] Although this
solar-energy-storing reaction is one of the most fundamental processes
in biology and essential for life, it also exemplifies the inefficiencies
of solar-to-fuel conversion.[3] For example,
Photosystem II (PSII) and Photosystem I (PSI) are non-complementary
light absorbers, which limits light harvesting efficiency. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate
carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) is responsible for CO2 fixation but has low turnover rates (1–10 s–1), thereby creating a significant kinetic bottleneck. RuBisCO also
reacts with O2 to produce 2-phosphoglycolate, which
must be recycled in energy-demanding, CO2-evolving photorespiration.[4,5] The CBB cycle involves significant adenosine triphosphate (ATP)
consumption, which leads to a lower biomass production efficiency
compared to the prokaryotic reductive acetyl-coenzyme A (rAcCoA)
pathway.[6] This alternative, light-independent
route to CO2 fixation uses the energy vector hydrogen as
electron donor to reduce two CO2 molecules to acetate in
a linear sequence of reaction steps.[7]Addressing the limitations of biological carbon fixation presents
several challenges,[8−14] leading research toward in vitro (but light-independent)
carbon fixation pathways.[15] As a bio-inspired
alternative, artificial photosynthesis aspires to couple solar-light-driven
water oxidation with CO2 reduction to chemical fuels at
higher efficiency than natural systems.[16] However, artificial photosynthetic carbon fixation is currently
not economically feasible due to a lack of efficient, selective, or
inexpensive catalysts and light absorbers.[17]One of the entry points of CO2 into the rAcCoA
pathway
is its conversion to formate before transfer to tetrahydrofolate
(the second entry point involves its reduction to CO by carbon monoxide
dehydrogenase/AcCoA synthase).[7] Coupling
this process to light-driven water oxidation is a compelling step
toward creating an efficient, artificial photosynthetic carbon
fixation pathway. Formate is also a stable intermediate between CO2 and methanol/methane, a hydrogen carrier, and a viable
fuel itself.[18,19] Semi-artificial photosynthesis,
in which catalytically efficient redox enzymes are interfaced with
synthetic materials, offers a possibility to couple this key entry
point of the rAcCoA pathway to light-driven CO2 reduction
and bypasses the energy-demanding and inefficient use of ATP.Mo- and W-dependent formate dehydrogenases (FDHs) are enzymes capable
of interconverting CO2 and formate.[20−28] When adsorbed on an electrode, FDHs from Syntrophobacter
fumaroxidans(21) and Escherichia coli(24,28) have been shown to
perform reversible electrocatalysis with high efficiency through
fast interfacial electron transfer. The activity of a Mo-FDH from E. coli has been harnessed in fuel cell
devices, in which it was immobilized in cobaltocene- and viologen-functionalized
redox polymers.[29,30] Electrochemical CO2 reduction using a W-FDH has been reported in mediated[31,32] and unmediated systems.[27] These FDHs
contrast with metal-independent FDHs, which reduce CO2 using
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), an unstable, expensive,
and diffusive cofactor with little driving force.[33−42] Metal-independent FDHs have been coupled to molecular,[43−46] biological,[47,48] and solid-state[38,41] visible-light-absorbers. In addition to the limitations of NADH
utilization, these systems suffer from low selectivity and rely on
sacrificial electron donors.Here, we report a semi-artificial
photoelectrochemical
(PEC) tandem cell that wires the enzymes PSII and FDH to perform light-driven
CO2 conversion to formate using water as an electron donor
(eq ). First, we study
the CO2 reduction activity of W-FDH from Desulfovibrio
vulgaris(49) adsorbed on a hierarchically
structured inverse opal titanium dioxide (IO-TiO2) scaffold
(IO-TiO2|FDH). This IO-TiO2|FDH
cathode is then wired to a recently reported PSII-based dye-sensitized
photoanode, IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII,[50] which combines isolated PSII
from Thermosynechococcus elongatus, dpp
(a phosphonated diketopyrrolopyrrole dye), and POs [poly(1-vinylimidazole-co-allylamine)-[Os(bipy)2Cl]Cl redox polymer] to realize a light-driven rAcCoA pathway
by coupling selective CO2 fixation to light-driven water
oxidation (Figure ).
Figure 1
(a) Schematic representation of the semi-artificial photosynthetic
tandem PEC cell coupling CO2 reduction to water oxidation.
A blend of POs and PSII adsorbed on a dpp-sensitized photoanode
(IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII) is wired
to an IO-TiO2|FDH cathode (species size not drawn
to scale). (b) Energy level diagram showing the electron-transfer
pathway between PSII, the redox polymer (POs), the dye
(dpp), the conduction band (CB) of IO-TiO2 electrodes,
four [Fe4S4] clusters, and the [WSe]-active
site in FDH. All potentials are reported vs SHE at pH 6.5. Abbreviations:
Mn4Ca, oxygen-evolving complex (OEC); P680, pigment/primary
electron donor; QB, plastoquinone B; [Fe4S4], iron–sulfur clusters; [WSe], FDH active site.
(a) Schematic representation of the semi-artificial photosynthetic
tandem PEC cell coupling CO2 reduction to water oxidation.
A blend of POs and PSII adsorbed on a dpp-sensitized photoanode
(IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII) is wired
to an IO-TiO2|FDH cathode (species size not drawn
to scale). (b) Energy level diagram showing the electron-transfer
pathway between PSII, the redox polymer (POs), the dye
(dpp), the conduction band (CB) of IO-TiO2 electrodes,
four [Fe4S4] clusters, and the [WSe]-active
site in FDH. All potentials are reported vs SHE at pH 6.5. Abbreviations:
Mn4Ca, oxygen-evolving complex (OEC); P680, pigment/primary
electron donor; QB, plastoquinone B; [Fe4S4], iron–sulfur clusters; [WSe], FDH active site.In this enzyme-catalyzed PEC system,
photogenerated electrons in
PSII, which is embedded in the redox polymer POs, are transferred
to the electron acceptor plastoquinone B (QB, Figure S1). The holes are collected at the oxygen-evolving
complex (OEC), where water is oxidized to liberate protons and gaseous
O2. The Os3+ complex in POs mediates
electron transfer between reduced QB and oxidized dpp. The conduction band (CB) of IO-TiO2 receives electrons from the photoexcited dpp*.[50] Electrons are transferred through the external electrical
circuit to the IO-TiO2|FDH cathode and arrive at
the CO2-reducing [WSe]-active site via interfacial electron
transfer from the TiO2 CB to iron–sulfur clusters
(Fe4S4) which connect the FDH active site to
its surface.Hierarchical macro-mesoporous IO-TiO2 electrodes (20
μm film thickness; geometrical surface area, A = 0.25 cm2) were assembled on a fluorine tin oxide (FTO)-coated
glass substrate (see Supporting Information).[50] An FDH solution (2 μL, 17 μM
with 50 mM dl-dithiothreitol, incubated for 10 min)
was drop-cast onto IO-TiO2 to give the IO-TiO2|FDH cathode. Anaerobic conditions were employed due to possible
O2 inhibition of FDH and side reactions of the electrode
components with O2. Protein film voltammetry (PFV) of IO-TiO2|FDH in a solution of CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM, pH 6.5, under 1 atm CO2) and KCl (50 mM) demonstrated
the high CO2 reduction activity of the electrode (Figure ). The current density
(J) of IO-TiO2|FDH was measured
as a function of an applied potential (Eapp) in a three-electrode configuration. The onset potential for CO2 reduction to formate was observed close to the thermodynamic
potential of the CO2/HCO2– couple (−0.36 V vs standard hydrogen electrode, SHE) at approximately
−0.4 V vs SHE, and a current density of −240 μA
cm–2 was reached at −0.6 V vs SHE.
Figure 2
PFV scans (v = 5 mV s–1) of
IO-TiO2 (black trace) and IO-TiO2|FDH
(red traces, arrow indicates scan order). Inset: CPE at Eapp = −0.6 V vs SHE. Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 atm CO2, pH
= 6.5, T = 25 °C, continuous stirring. The three-electrode
configuration employed a two-compartment cell with Ag/AgCl (saturated
KCl) reference and Pt mesh counter electrodes.
PFV scans (v = 5 mV s–1) of
IO-TiO2 (black trace) and IO-TiO2|FDH
(red traces, arrow indicates scan order). Inset: CPE at Eapp = −0.6 V vs SHE. Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 atm CO2, pH
= 6.5, T = 25 °C, continuous stirring. The three-electrode
configuration employed a two-compartment cell with Ag/AgCl (saturated
KCl) reference and Pt mesh counter electrodes.The IO-TiO2|FDH electrode exhibited good
stability,
retaining approximately 83% of its initial activity after controlled-potential
electrolysis (CPE) for 2 h at Eapp = −0.6
vs SHE (Figure , inset).
The Faradaic efficiency (ηF) of formate production
was determined as (78 ± 8)% (2.22 ± 0.23 μmol cm–2). A voltammogram recorded immediately after the CPE
experiment indicated electrode behavior similar to that measured before
CPE (Figure S2), though with slightly lower,
yet stable, activity. No H2 production was detectable by
gas chromatography (GC) analysis of the cell headspace, suggesting
that the background current was due to charging of the CB of TiO2 (Figure ).[51] The relatively high current densities of the
IO-TiO2|FDH electrode were likely due to high enzyme
loading and effective wiring inside the porous, hierarchically structured
IO-TiO2 scaffold.[52,53] Thus, the cathode proved
to be suitable for coupling to PSII-catalyzed water oxidation in a
two-electrode PEC setup.The activity of the IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII electrode in CO2/NaHCO3/KCl electrolyte
solution was measured by stepped-potential chronoamperometry
under periodic simulated solar illumination (Figure S3), showing behavior comparable to that of the recently reported
PSII-modified dye-sensitized photoanode.[50] The photoanode was electrically wired to the IO-TiO2|FDH cathode via a potentiostat, and the two electrodes
were placed in compartments separated by a glass frit membrane in
a PEC cell (Figure ).Stepped-voltage chronoamperometry under periodic illumination
with
UV-filtered simulated solar light (AM1.5G; irradiance Ee = 100 mW cm–2; λ > 420 nm, Figure a) was used to study
the system’s performance. Upon irradiation, a current density
of 5.5 ± 0.4 μA cm–2 was observed at
zero applied voltage (Uapp) (Figures S4 and S5). Voltage-independent steady-state
photocurrents (99 ± 4 μA cm–2)
were reached at Uapp > 0.4 V. Control
experiments showed that small background responses were also observed
using PSII-free IO-TiO2|dpp photoanodes (Figure , green and black
traces) due to electron transfer from photoexcited dpp to TiO2 without dye regeneration, resulting in photobleaching.[50] When FDH was omitted from the system (Figure , blue trace), lower
photoresponses were observed than in its presence, but the current
response was higher than those responses observed in the absence of
PSII. This background current is likely due to high capacitance of
the high surface area IO-TiO2 (charging of TiO2 CB), supported by the cathodic discharging spikes observed upon
switching off the light and persisting photocurrents in the
chronoamperometry measurements with longer irradiation time
(Figure S6). Substantial capacitance currents
over a long time scale consistent with those observed in this study
have been previously observed for porous TiO2 electrodes.[51,54] At lower applied voltages (Uapp <
0.4 V), Faradaic current from CO2 reduction with FDH and
some charging of TiO2 should dominate, whereas at higher
applied voltages (Uapp > 0.5 V), substantial
TiO2 CB charging and possibly electrode degradation (e.g.,
FTO breakdown) could become significantly competing processes (Figure S7).
Figure 3
Characterization of two-electrode PEC
cell consisting of IO-TiO2|FDH cathode wired to
IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII tandem
photoanode. (a) Representative stepped-voltage
chronoamperometry (0.1 V voltage steps with 30 s dark and 30
s light cycles) of the fully assembled PEC cell (red trace). Control
experiments in the absence of PSII (green and black traces) and without
FDH (blue and black traces) are also shown. Applied voltage (Uapp) values are shown on top of the traces.
(b) CPE (Uapp = 0.3 V) of the two-electrode
PSII-FDH system (red trace) and a similar system in the absence of
FDH (blue trace). Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100
mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 atm CO2, pH = 6.5, T = 25 °C, continuous stirring. Simulated solar light source:
AM 1.5G filter; Ee = 100 mW cm–2; λ > 420 nm.
Characterization of two-electrode PEC
cell consisting of IO-TiO2|FDH cathode wired to
IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII tandem
photoanode. (a) Representative stepped-voltage
chronoamperometry (0.1 V voltage steps with 30 s dark and 30
s light cycles) of the fully assembled PEC cell (red trace). Control
experiments in the absence of PSII (green and black traces) and without
FDH (blue and black traces) are also shown. Applied voltage (Uapp) values are shown on top of the traces.
(b) CPE (Uapp = 0.3 V) of the two-electrode
PSII-FDH system (red trace) and a similar system in the absence of
FDH (blue trace). Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100
mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 atm CO2, pH = 6.5, T = 25 °C, continuous stirring. Simulated solar light source:
AM 1.5G filter; Ee = 100 mW cm–2; λ > 420 nm.Only a small bias was required to drive the overall reaction
(eq ). CPE at Uapp = 0.3 V with the IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII||IO-TiO2|FDH PEC cell under
illumination was performed (Figure b). The photocurrent decayed from 92 to 7 μA
cm–2 after 1 h irradiation with a half-life time
(τ1/2) of ∼8 min (Figure S8). Prolonged irradiation resulted in an irreversible drop
in photocurrent, most likely due to PSII photodegradation.[3] Formate was detected (0.185 ± 0.017 μmol
cm–2) with ηF = (70 ± 6)%,
but reliable O2 analysis (estimated 0.132 μmol cm–2, 0.01% O2, assuming quantitative ηF) was prevented by the detection limit of the apparatus. Other
products such as H2 and CO could not be detected in the
cathodic chamber. No products (H2, CO, and formate) were
observed in control experiments omitting FDH at Uapp = 0.3 and 0.6 V (Figures b and S7).In summary, we have demonstrated that the IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII||IO-TiO2|FDH PEC cell achieves
the biologically and synthetically challenging coupling of solar-driven
water oxidation to selective CO2 reduction with a small
additional supply of energy (applied voltage) under mild conditions.
The semi-artificial architecture employs efficient enzymes and synthetic
components that enable not only complementary light absorption but
also the coupling of unnatural redox partners, which is challenging in vivo. The PSII-FDH tandem PEC system reported here demonstrates
how semi-artificial photosynthesis is a translatable and versatile
platform, allowing a variety of electroactive enzymes to be
studied electrochemically to gain a better understanding of
their activity in vitro. From a biological perspective,
this system can be viewed as an effective model for an engineered
light-driven rAcCoA pathway that bypasses limitations of the natural
Z-scheme and CBB cycle. Further biologically relevant electrochemical
reactions and redox proteins may be coupled using this approach to
introduce a plethora of model systems which extend solar-driven CO2 reduction to production of value-added chemicals.
Authors: Mengwei Yuan; Selmihan Sahin; Rong Cai; Sofiene Abdellaoui; David P Hickey; Shelley D Minteer; Ross D Milton Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Matthew W Keller; Gerrit J Schut; Gina L Lipscomb; Angeli L Menon; Ifeyinwa J Iwuchukwu; Therese T Leuko; Michael P Thorgersen; William J Nixon; Aaron S Hawkins; Robert M Kelly; Michael W W Adams Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vivek M Badiani; Samuel J Cobb; Andreas Wagner; Ana Rita Oliveira; Sónia Zacarias; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner Journal: ACS Catal Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 13.700
Authors: Melanie Miller; William E Robinson; Ana Rita Oliveira; Nina Heidary; Nikolay Kornienko; Julien Warnan; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Katarzyna P Sokol; William E Robinson; Ana R Oliveira; Sonia Zacarias; Chong-Yong Lee; Christopher Madden; Arnau Bassegoda; Judy Hirst; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Juan M Artes Vivancos; Ivo H M van Stokkum; Francesco Saccon; Yusaku Hontani; Miroslav Kloz; Alexander Ruban; Rienk van Grondelle; John T M Kennis Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Esther Edwardes Moore; Samuel J Cobb; Ana Margarida Coito; Ana Rita Oliveira; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 12.779