Literature DB >> 30452863

Photoreduction of CO2 with a Formate Dehydrogenase Driven by Photosystem II Using a Semi-artificial Z-Scheme Architecture.

Katarzyna P Sokol1, William E Robinson1, Ana R Oliveira2, Julien Warnan1, Marc M Nowaczyk3, Adrian Ruff4, Inês A C Pereira2, Erwin Reisner1.   

Abstract

Solar-driven coupling of water oxidation with CO2 reduction sustains life on our planet and is of high priority in contemporary energy research. Here, we report a photoelectrochemical tandem device that performs photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate. We employ a semi-artificial design, which wires a W-dependent formate dehydrogenase (FDH) cathode to a photoanode containing the photosynthetic water oxidation enzyme, Photosystem II, via a synthetic dye with complementary light absorption. From a biological perspective, the system achieves a metabolically inaccessible pathway of light-driven CO2 fixation to formate. From a synthetic point of view, it represents a proof-of-principle system utilizing precious-metal-free catalysts for selective CO2-to-formate conversion using water as an electron donor. This hybrid platform demonstrates the translatability and versatility of coupling abiotic and biotic components to create challenging models for solar fuel and chemical synthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30452863      PMCID: PMC6307851          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b10247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


In the thylakoid membrane of plants, light-driven water oxidation in the photosynthetic Z-scheme is coupled to CO2 fixation for sugar synthesis via the dark Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle (eq ).[1,2] Although this solar-energy-storing reaction is one of the most fundamental processes in biology and essential for life, it also exemplifies the inefficiencies of solar-to-fuel conversion.[3] For example, Photosystem II (PSII) and Photosystem I (PSI) are non-complementary light absorbers, which limits light harvesting efficiency. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) is responsible for CO2 fixation but has low turnover rates (1–10 s–1), thereby creating a significant kinetic bottleneck. RuBisCO also reacts with O2 to produce 2-phosphoglycolate, which must be recycled in energy-demanding, CO2-evolving photorespiration.[4,5] The CBB cycle involves significant adenosine triphosphate (ATP) consumption, which leads to a lower biomass production efficiency compared to the prokaryotic reductive acetyl-coenzyme A (rAcCoA) pathway.[6] This alternative, light-independent route to CO2 fixation uses the energy vector hydrogen as electron donor to reduce two CO2 molecules to acetate in a linear sequence of reaction steps.[7] Addressing the limitations of biological carbon fixation presents several challenges,[8−14] leading research toward in vitro (but light-independent) carbon fixation pathways.[15] As a bio-inspired alternative, artificial photosynthesis aspires to couple solar-light-driven water oxidation with CO2 reduction to chemical fuels at higher efficiency than natural systems.[16] However, artificial photosynthetic carbon fixation is currently not economically feasible due to a lack of efficient, selective, or inexpensive catalysts and light absorbers.[17] One of the entry points of CO2 into the rAcCoA pathway is its conversion to formate before transfer to tetrahydrofolate (the second entry point involves its reduction to CO by carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/AcCoA synthase).[7] Coupling this process to light-driven water oxidation is a compelling step toward creating an efficient, artificial photosynthetic carbon fixation pathway. Formate is also a stable intermediate between CO2 and methanol/methane, a hydrogen carrier, and a viable fuel itself.[18,19] Semi-artificial photosynthesis, in which catalytically efficient redox enzymes are interfaced with synthetic materials, offers a possibility to couple this key entry point of the rAcCoA pathway to light-driven CO2 reduction and bypasses the energy-demanding and inefficient use of ATP. Mo- and W-dependent formate dehydrogenases (FDHs) are enzymes capable of interconverting CO2 and formate.[20−28] When adsorbed on an electrode, FDHs from Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans(21) and Escherichia coli(24,28) have been shown to perform reversible electrocatalysis with high efficiency through fast interfacial electron transfer. The activity of a Mo-FDH from E. coli has been harnessed in fuel cell devices, in which it was immobilized in cobaltocene- and viologen-functionalized redox polymers.[29,30] Electrochemical CO2 reduction using a W-FDH has been reported in mediated[31,32] and unmediated systems.[27] These FDHs contrast with metal-independent FDHs, which reduce CO2 using nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), an unstable, expensive, and diffusive cofactor with little driving force.[33−42] Metal-independent FDHs have been coupled to molecular,[43−46] biological,[47,48] and solid-state[38,41] visible-light-absorbers. In addition to the limitations of NADH utilization, these systems suffer from low selectivity and rely on sacrificial electron donors. Here, we report a semi-artificial photoelectrochemical (PEC) tandem cell that wires the enzymes PSII and FDH to perform light-driven CO2 conversion to formate using water as an electron donor (eq ). First, we study the CO2 reduction activity of W-FDH from Desulfovibrio vulgaris(49) adsorbed on a hierarchically structured inverse opal titanium dioxide (IO-TiO2) scaffold (IO-TiO2|FDH). This IO-TiO2|FDH cathode is then wired to a recently reported PSII-based dye-sensitized photoanode, IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII,[50] which combines isolated PSII from Thermosynechococcus elongatus, dpp (a phosphonated diketopyrrolopyrrole dye), and POs [poly(1-vinylimidazole-co-allylamine)-[Os(bipy)2Cl]Cl redox polymer] to realize a light-driven rAcCoA pathway by coupling selective CO2 fixation to light-driven water oxidation (Figure ).
Figure 1

(a) Schematic representation of the semi-artificial photosynthetic tandem PEC cell coupling CO2 reduction to water oxidation. A blend of POs and PSII adsorbed on a dpp-sensitized photoanode (IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII) is wired to an IO-TiO2|FDH cathode (species size not drawn to scale). (b) Energy level diagram showing the electron-transfer pathway between PSII, the redox polymer (POs), the dye (dpp), the conduction band (CB) of IO-TiO2 electrodes, four [Fe4S4] clusters, and the [WSe]-active site in FDH. All potentials are reported vs SHE at pH 6.5. Abbreviations: Mn4Ca, oxygen-evolving complex (OEC); P680, pigment/primary electron donor; QB, plastoquinone B; [Fe4S4], iron–sulfur clusters; [WSe], FDH active site.

(a) Schematic representation of the semi-artificial photosynthetic tandem PEC cell coupling CO2 reduction to water oxidation. A blend of POs and PSII adsorbed on a dpp-sensitized photoanode (IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII) is wired to an IO-TiO2|FDH cathode (species size not drawn to scale). (b) Energy level diagram showing the electron-transfer pathway between PSII, the redox polymer (POs), the dye (dpp), the conduction band (CB) of IO-TiO2 electrodes, four [Fe4S4] clusters, and the [WSe]-active site in FDH. All potentials are reported vs SHE at pH 6.5. Abbreviations: Mn4Ca, oxygen-evolving complex (OEC); P680, pigment/primary electron donor; QB, plastoquinone B; [Fe4S4], iron–sulfur clusters; [WSe], FDH active site. In this enzyme-catalyzed PEC system, photogenerated electrons in PSII, which is embedded in the redox polymer POs, are transferred to the electron acceptor plastoquinone B (QB, Figure S1). The holes are collected at the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), where water is oxidized to liberate protons and gaseous O2. The Os3+ complex in POs mediates electron transfer between reduced QB and oxidized dpp. The conduction band (CB) of IO-TiO2 receives electrons from the photoexcited dpp*.[50] Electrons are transferred through the external electrical circuit to the IO-TiO2|FDH cathode and arrive at the CO2-reducing [WSe]-active site via interfacial electron transfer from the TiO2 CB to iron–sulfur clusters (Fe4S4) which connect the FDH active site to its surface. Hierarchical macro-mesoporous IO-TiO2 electrodes (20 μm film thickness; geometrical surface area, A = 0.25 cm2) were assembled on a fluorine tin oxide (FTO)-coated glass substrate (see Supporting Information).[50] An FDH solution (2 μL, 17 μM with 50 mM dl-dithiothreitol, incubated for 10 min) was drop-cast onto IO-TiO2 to give the IO-TiO2|FDH cathode. Anaerobic conditions were employed due to possible O2 inhibition of FDH and side reactions of the electrode components with O2. Protein film voltammetry (PFV) of IO-TiO2|FDH in a solution of CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM, pH 6.5, under 1 atm CO2) and KCl (50 mM) demonstrated the high CO2 reduction activity of the electrode (Figure ). The current density (J) of IO-TiO2|FDH was measured as a function of an applied potential (Eapp) in a three-electrode configuration. The onset potential for CO2 reduction to formate was observed close to the thermodynamic potential of the CO2/HCO2– couple (−0.36 V vs standard hydrogen electrode, SHE) at approximately −0.4 V vs SHE, and a current density of −240 μA cm–2 was reached at −0.6 V vs SHE.
Figure 2

PFV scans (v = 5 mV s–1) of IO-TiO2 (black trace) and IO-TiO2|FDH (red traces, arrow indicates scan order). Inset: CPE at Eapp = −0.6 V vs SHE. Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 atm CO2, pH = 6.5, T = 25 °C, continuous stirring. The three-electrode configuration employed a two-compartment cell with Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) reference and Pt mesh counter electrodes.

PFV scans (v = 5 mV s–1) of IO-TiO2 (black trace) and IO-TiO2|FDH (red traces, arrow indicates scan order). Inset: CPE at Eapp = −0.6 V vs SHE. Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 atm CO2, pH = 6.5, T = 25 °C, continuous stirring. The three-electrode configuration employed a two-compartment cell with Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) reference and Pt mesh counter electrodes. The IO-TiO2|FDH electrode exhibited good stability, retaining approximately 83% of its initial activity after controlled-potential electrolysis (CPE) for 2 h at Eapp = −0.6 vs SHE (Figure , inset). The Faradaic efficiency (ηF) of formate production was determined as (78 ± 8)% (2.22 ± 0.23 μmol cm–2). A voltammogram recorded immediately after the CPE experiment indicated electrode behavior similar to that measured before CPE (Figure S2), though with slightly lower, yet stable, activity. No H2 production was detectable by gas chromatography (GC) analysis of the cell headspace, suggesting that the background current was due to charging of the CB of TiO2 (Figure ).[51] The relatively high current densities of the IO-TiO2|FDH electrode were likely due to high enzyme loading and effective wiring inside the porous, hierarchically structured IO-TiO2 scaffold.[52,53] Thus, the cathode proved to be suitable for coupling to PSII-catalyzed water oxidation in a two-electrode PEC setup. The activity of the IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII electrode in CO2/NaHCO3/KCl electrolyte solution was measured by stepped-potential chronoamperometry under periodic simulated solar illumination (Figure S3), showing behavior comparable to that of the recently reported PSII-modified dye-sensitized photoanode.[50] The photoanode was electrically wired to the IO-TiO2|FDH cathode via a potentiostat, and the two electrodes were placed in compartments separated by a glass frit membrane in a PEC cell (Figure ). Stepped-voltage chronoamperometry under periodic illumination with UV-filtered simulated solar light (AM1.5G; irradiance Ee = 100 mW cm–2; λ > 420 nm, Figure a) was used to study the system’s performance. Upon irradiation, a current density of 5.5 ± 0.4 μA cm–2 was observed at zero applied voltage (Uapp) (Figures S4 and S5). Voltage-independent steady-state photocurrents (99 ± 4 μA cm–2) were reached at Uapp > 0.4 V. Control experiments showed that small background responses were also observed using PSII-free IO-TiO2|dpp photoanodes (Figure , green and black traces) due to electron transfer from photoexcited dpp to TiO2 without dye regeneration, resulting in photobleaching.[50] When FDH was omitted from the system (Figure , blue trace), lower photoresponses were observed than in its presence, but the current response was higher than those responses observed in the absence of PSII. This background current is likely due to high capacitance of the high surface area IO-TiO2 (charging of TiO2 CB), supported by the cathodic discharging spikes observed upon switching off the light and persisting photocurrents in the chronoamperometry measurements with longer irradiation time (Figure S6). Substantial capacitance currents over a long time scale consistent with those observed in this study have been previously observed for porous TiO2 electrodes.[51,54] At lower applied voltages (Uapp < 0.4 V), Faradaic current from CO2 reduction with FDH and some charging of TiO2 should dominate, whereas at higher applied voltages (Uapp > 0.5 V), substantial TiO2 CB charging and possibly electrode degradation (e.g., FTO breakdown) could become significantly competing processes (Figure S7).
Figure 3

Characterization of two-electrode PEC cell consisting of IO-TiO2|FDH cathode wired to IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII tandem photoanode. (a) Representative stepped-voltage chronoamperometry (0.1 V voltage steps with 30 s dark and 30 s light cycles) of the fully assembled PEC cell (red trace). Control experiments in the absence of PSII (green and black traces) and without FDH (blue and black traces) are also shown. Applied voltage (Uapp) values are shown on top of the traces. (b) CPE (Uapp = 0.3 V) of the two-electrode PSII-FDH system (red trace) and a similar system in the absence of FDH (blue trace). Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 atm CO2, pH = 6.5, T = 25 °C, continuous stirring. Simulated solar light source: AM 1.5G filter; Ee = 100 mW cm–2; λ > 420 nm.

Characterization of two-electrode PEC cell consisting of IO-TiO2|FDH cathode wired to IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII tandem photoanode. (a) Representative stepped-voltage chronoamperometry (0.1 V voltage steps with 30 s dark and 30 s light cycles) of the fully assembled PEC cell (red trace). Control experiments in the absence of PSII (green and black traces) and without FDH (blue and black traces) are also shown. Applied voltage (Uapp) values are shown on top of the traces. (b) CPE (Uapp = 0.3 V) of the two-electrode PSII-FDH system (red trace) and a similar system in the absence of FDH (blue trace). Conditions: CO2/NaHCO3 (100 mM), KCl (50 mM), 1 atm CO2, pH = 6.5, T = 25 °C, continuous stirring. Simulated solar light source: AM 1.5G filter; Ee = 100 mW cm–2; λ > 420 nm. Only a small bias was required to drive the overall reaction (eq ). CPE at Uapp = 0.3 V with the IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII||IO-TiO2|FDH PEC cell under illumination was performed (Figure b). The photocurrent decayed from 92 to 7 μA cm–2 after 1 h irradiation with a half-life time (τ1/2) of ∼8 min (Figure S8). Prolonged irradiation resulted in an irreversible drop in photocurrent, most likely due to PSII photodegradation.[3] Formate was detected (0.185 ± 0.017 μmol cm–2) with ηF = (70 ± 6)%, but reliable O2 analysis (estimated 0.132 μmol cm–2, 0.01% O2, assuming quantitative ηF) was prevented by the detection limit of the apparatus. Other products such as H2 and CO could not be detected in the cathodic chamber. No products (H2, CO, and formate) were observed in control experiments omitting FDH at Uapp = 0.3 and 0.6 V (Figures b and S7). In summary, we have demonstrated that the IO-TiO2|dpp|POs-PSII||IO-TiO2|FDH PEC cell achieves the biologically and synthetically challenging coupling of solar-driven water oxidation to selective CO2 reduction with a small additional supply of energy (applied voltage) under mild conditions. The semi-artificial architecture employs efficient enzymes and synthetic components that enable not only complementary light absorption but also the coupling of unnatural redox partners, which is challenging in vivo. The PSII-FDH tandem PEC system reported here demonstrates how semi-artificial photosynthesis is a translatable and versatile platform, allowing a variety of electroactive enzymes to be studied electrochemically to gain a better understanding of their activity in vitro. From a biological perspective, this system can be viewed as an effective model for an engineered light-driven rAcCoA pathway that bypasses limitations of the natural Z-scheme and CBB cycle. Further biologically relevant electrochemical reactions and redox proteins may be coupled using this approach to introduce a plethora of model systems which extend solar-driven CO2 reduction to production of value-added chemicals.
  36 in total

1.  Creating a Low-Potential Redox Polymer for Efficient Electroenzymatic CO2 Reduction.

Authors:  Mengwei Yuan; Selmihan Sahin; Rong Cai; Sofiene Abdellaoui; David P Hickey; Shelley D Minteer; Ross D Milton
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Enzymatic electrosynthesis of formate through CO2 sequestration/reduction in a bioelectrochemical system (BES).

Authors:  Sandipam Srikanth; Miranda Maesen; Xochitl Dominguez-Benetton; Karolien Vanbroekhoven; Deepak Pant
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 3.  A short history of RubisCO: the rise and fall (?) of Nature's predominant CO2 fixing enzyme.

Authors:  Tobias J Erb; Jan Zarzycki
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  CO2 Photoreduction by Formate Dehydrogenase and a Ru-Complex in a Nanoporous Glass Reactor.

Authors:  Tomoyasu Noji; Tetsuro Jin; Mamoru Nango; Nobuo Kamiya; Yutaka Amao
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Controlled generation of hydrogen from formic acid amine adducts at room temperature and application in H2/O2 fuel cells.

Authors:  Björn Loges; Albert Boddien; Henrik Junge; Matthias Beller
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Exploiting microbial hyperthermophilicity to produce an industrial chemical, using hydrogen and carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Matthew W Keller; Gerrit J Schut; Gina L Lipscomb; Angeli L Menon; Ifeyinwa J Iwuchukwu; Therese T Leuko; Michael P Thorgersen; William J Nixon; Aaron S Hawkins; Robert M Kelly; Michael W W Adams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reduction of Carbon Dioxide by a Molybdenum-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase: A Kinetic and Mechanistic Study.

Authors:  Luisa B Maia; Luis Fonseca; Isabel Moura; José J G Moura
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  A synthetic pathway for the fixation of carbon dioxide in vitro.

Authors:  Thomas Schwander; Lennart Schada von Borzyskowski; Simon Burgener; Niña Socorro Cortina; Tobias J Erb
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Reversible interconversion of CO2 and formate by a molybdenum-containing formate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Arnau Bassegoda; Christopher Madden; David W Wakerley; Erwin Reisner; Judy Hirst
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol by Direct Injection of Electrons into Immobilized Enzymes on a Modified Electrode.

Authors:  Stefanie Schlager; Liviu Mihai Dumitru; Marianne Haberbauer; Anita Fuchsbauer; Helmut Neugebauer; Daniela Hiemetsberger; Annika Wagner; Engelbert Portenkirchner; Niyazi Serdar Sariciftci
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 8.928

View more
  12 in total

1.  Elucidating Film Loss and the Role of Hydrogen Bonding of Adsorbed Redox Enzymes by Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance Analysis.

Authors:  Vivek M Badiani; Samuel J Cobb; Andreas Wagner; Ana Rita Oliveira; Sónia Zacarias; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 13.700

2.  Understanding How the Rate of C-H Bond Cleavage Affects Formate Oxidation Catalysis by a Mo-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  William E Robinson; Arnau Bassegoda; James N Blaza; Erwin Reisner; Judy Hirst
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Interfacing Formate Dehydrogenase with Metal Oxides for the Reversible Electrocatalysis and Solar-Driven Reduction of Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Melanie Miller; William E Robinson; Ana Rita Oliveira; Nina Heidary; Nikolay Kornienko; Julien Warnan; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Reversible and Selective Interconversion of Hydrogen and Carbon Dioxide into Formate by a Semiartificial Formate Hydrogenlyase Mimic.

Authors:  Katarzyna P Sokol; William E Robinson; Ana R Oliveira; Sonia Zacarias; Chong-Yong Lee; Christopher Madden; Arnau Bassegoda; Judy Hirst; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Sequential Co-immobilization of Enzymes in Metal-Organic Frameworks for Efficient Biocatalytic Conversion of Adsorbed CO2 to Formate.

Authors:  Yan Li; Liyin Wen; Tianwei Tan; Yongqin Lv
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-06

6.  Unraveling the Excited-State Dynamics and Light-Harvesting Functions of Xanthophylls in Light-Harvesting Complex II Using Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Juan M Artes Vivancos; Ivo H M van Stokkum; Francesco Saccon; Yusaku Hontani; Miroslav Kloz; Alexander Ruban; Rienk van Grondelle; John T M Kennis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Research Progress in Conversion of CO2 to Valuable Fuels.

Authors:  Luyi Xu; Yang Xiu; Fangyuan Liu; Yuwei Liang; Shengjie Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Biocatalytic Reduction Reactions from a Chemist's Perspective.

Authors:  Frank Hollmann; Diederik J Opperman; Caroline E Paul
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  A Tandem Solar Biofuel Cell: Harnessing Energy from Light and Biofuels.

Authors:  Marc Riedel; Soraya Höfs; Adrian Ruff; Wolfgang Schuhmann; Fred Lisdat
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 15.336

10.  Understanding the local chemical environment of bioelectrocatalysis.

Authors:  Esther Edwardes Moore; Samuel J Cobb; Ana Margarida Coito; Ana Rita Oliveira; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 12.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.