| Literature DB >> 30452478 |
Seif Bennia1,2,3, Rim Milad1,2, Sabri Messaoudi1,2, Marine de Person4, Fathi Moussa4, Manef Abderrabba1, Denis Merlet3.
Abstract
Since the early nineties, countless publications have been devoted to the study of possible uses of [60] fullerene (C60) and its derivatives in the fields of materials and nano-biomedical sciences. However, in spite of the importance of conformers notably from the pharmacological point of view, the cis/trans isomerization of C60 mono-adducts has been rarely seldom investigated. Here we present the results of DFT calculations of the structural, vibrational and NMR properties of both cis and trans isomers of fulleropyrrolidine mono-adduct obtained by photo-addition of glycine methyl ester to C60. Taken together, our results have shown that the cis isomer is more stable than the trans one. For the cis conformation, the simulated vibrational spectrum shows a more intense peak at 1298 cm-1. While 13C spectra revealed no significant differences between the two isomers as compared to experimental results, the calculated 1H chemical shifts show a significant difference between the two conformers in both the gas phase and in solution. The trans isomer presents a proton at 5.86 ppm, which is more deshielded than the proton of the cis conformer (5.24 ppm).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30452478 PMCID: PMC6242360 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Representation of the (a) cis and (b) trans isomers of the fulleropyrrolidine mono-adduct.
Energy difference between the cis and trans isomers (kJ mol-1).
| Structure | ΔE (gas phase) | ΔE (solvent CDCl3) |
|---|---|---|
| Mono-adduct ( | ||
| Mono-adduct ( |
Fig 2(a) Superposition of the two simulated IR full spectra of the cis and trans mono-adducts (b) Zoom in on the range from 0 to 2000 cm-1 of the same superposition.
Comparison between experimental and calculated IR spectra for the cis and trans compounds with significant intensities (cm-1).
| Attributions | EXP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| - | 323 | - | - |
| - | 737 | 737 | - |
| - | 783 | 783 | - |
| - | 806 | - | - |
| - | 852 | - | - |
| - | - | 883 | - |
| - | - | 1136 | - |
| C-O | 1167 | 1167 | - |
| C-O | 1190 | 1198 | 1255 |
| C-H | 1259 | 1251 | - |
| C-H | 1298 | 1313 | - |
| C-N | 1367 | 1359 | 1428 |
| C = O | 1756 | 1751 | 1740 |
| N-H | 3340 | 3356 | 3288 |
According to Skanji et al [5].
Comparison between calculated and experimental chemical shifts of the cis and trans isomers.
| RMSD | RMSD | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH3 | CH | NH | CH3 | CH | NH | |||
| 4.01 | 5.24 | 4.15 | 3.98 | 5.86 | 3.65 | |||
| 4.11 | 5.97 | 4.68 | 4.14 | 6.5 | 4.31 | |||
| 3.93 | 5.59 | 4.54 | 3.93 | 5.59 | 4.54 | |||
According to Skanji et al [5]
Chemical shifts (ppm) calculated for the cis isomer in CDCl3.
| RMSD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH3 | CH | NH | ||
| 4.01 | 5.24 | 4.15 | 0.47 | |
| 0.51 | ||||
| 3.93 | 5.59 | 4.54 | ||
: According to Skanji et al. [5].
Fig 3Different atoms of the adsorbed molecule.
Experimental and calculated 13C NMR spectra.
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | Carboxylic Ester | CH3 | RMSD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74.0 | - | 149.84 | 152.1 | 160–170 | 52.9 | - | |
: According to Skanji et al. [5].