Literature DB >> 30452209

Cost of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorders following inpatient detoxification.

Kathryn E McCollister1, Jared A Leff, Xuan Yang, Joshua D Lee, Edward V Nunes, Patricia Novo, John Rotrosen, Bruce R Schackman, Sean M Murphy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the costs of providing extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX) and buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) following inpatient detoxification using data derived from a multisite randomized controlled trial at 8 US community-based treatment programs. STUDY
DESIGN: Cost data were collected for 3 intervention phases: program start-up, inpatient detoxification, and up to 24 weeks of medication induction and management visits (post detoxification). Cost analyses were from the healthcare sector perspective (2015 US$); patient costs are also reported.
METHODS: We conducted site visits, administered a cost survey to treatment programs, and analyzed study data on medication and services utilization. Nationally representative sources were used to estimate unit costs. Uncertainty was evaluated in sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS: Mean start-up costs were $1071 per program for XR-NTX and $828 per program for BUP-NX. Mean costs per participant were $5416 for XR-NTX (57% detoxification, 37% medication, 3% provider, 3% patient) and $4148 for BUP-NX (64% detoxification, 12% medication, 10% provider, 14% patient). Total cost per participant ranged by site from $2979 to $8963 for XR-NTX and from $2521 to $6486 for BUP-NX.
CONCLUSIONS: For treatment providers, offering XR-NTX and/or BUP-NX as part of existing detoxification treatment modalities generates modest costs in addition to the costs of detoxification, which vary substantially among the 8 sites. From the patient's perspective, the costs associated with medication management visits may be a barrier for some individuals considering these treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30452209      PMCID: PMC6345513     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  14 in total

Review 1.  Adjusting Health Expenditures for Inflation: A Review of Measures for Health Services Research in the United States.

Authors:  Abe Dunn; Scott D Grosse; Samuel H Zuvekas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Long-Acting Injectable Naltrexone Induction: A Randomized Trial of Outpatient Opioid Detoxification With Naltrexone Versus Buprenorphine.

Authors:  Maria Sullivan; Adam Bisaga; Martina Pavlicova; C Jean Choi; Kaitlyn Mishlen; Kenneth M Carpenter; Frances R Levin; Elias Dakwar; John J Mariani; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Outpatient transition to extended-release injectable naltrexone for patients with opioid use disorder: A phase 3 randomized trial.

Authors:  Adam Bisaga; Paolo Mannelli; Miao Yu; Narinder Nangia; Christine E Graham; D Andrew Tompkins; Thomas R Kosten; Sarah C Akerman; Bernard L Silverman; Maria A Sullivan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Effectiveness of Injectable Extended-Release Naltrexone vs Daily Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Lars Tanum; Kristin Klemmetsby Solli; Zill-E-Huma Latif; Jurate Šaltyte Benth; Arild Opheim; Kamni Sharma-Haase; Peter Krajci; Nikolaj Kunøe
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 5.  Primary Care-Based Models for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  P Todd Korthuis; Dennis McCarty; Melissa Weimer; Christina Bougatsos; Ian Blazina; Bernadette Zakher; Sara Grusing; Beth Devine; Roger Chou
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  NIDA Clinical Trials Network CTN-0051, Extended-Release Naltrexone vs. Buprenorphine for Opioid Treatment (X:BOT): Study design and rationale.

Authors:  Joshua D Lee; Edward V Nunes; Patricia Novo Mpa; Genie L Bailey; Gregory S Brigham; Allan J Cohen; Marc Fishman; Walter Ling; Robert Lindblad; Dikla Shmueli-Blumberg; Don Stablein; Jeanine May; Dagmar Salazar; David Liu; John Rotrosen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Costing and cost analysis in randomized controlled trials: caveat emptor.

Authors:  Daniel Polsky; Henry Glick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence.

Authors:  R P Mattick; J Kimber; C Breen; M Davoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

9.  Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Joshua D Lee; Edward V Nunes; Patricia Novo; Ken Bachrach; Genie L Bailey; Snehal Bhatt; Sarah Farkas; Marc Fishman; Phoebe Gauthier; Candace C Hodgkins; Jacquie King; Robert Lindblad; David Liu; Abigail G Matthews; Jeanine May; K Michelle Peavy; Stephen Ross; Dagmar Salazar; Paul Schkolnik; Dikla Shmueli-Blumberg; Don Stablein; Geetha Subramaniam; John Rotrosen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Economic Evaluations of Opioid Use Disorder Interventions.

Authors:  Sean M Murphy; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Buprenorphine-Naloxone Versus Extended-Release Naltrexone to Prevent Opioid Relapse.

Authors:  Sean M Murphy; Kathryn E McCollister; Jared A Leff; Xuan Yang; Philip J Jeng; Joshua D Lee; Edward V Nunes; Patricia Novo; John Rotrosen; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Population-level impact of initiating pharmacotherapy and linking to care people with opioid use disorder at inpatient medically managed withdrawal programs: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra Savinkina; Rajapaksha W M A Madushani; Golnaz Eftekhari Yazdi; Jianing Wang; Joshua A Barocas; Jake R Morgan; Sabrina A Assoumou; Alexander Y Walley; Benjamin P Linas; Sean M Murphy
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 7.256

3.  Economic evaluation in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Ali Jalali; Danielle A Ryan; Kathryn E McCollister; Lisa A Marsch; Bruce R Schackman; Sean M Murphy
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2020-03

4.  Cost-effectiveness implications of increasing the efficiency of the extended-release naltrexone induction process for the treatment of opioid use disorder: a secondary analysis.

Authors:  Sean M Murphy; Philip J Jeng; Kathryn E McCollister; Jared A Leff; Ali Jalali; Matisyahu Shulman; Joshua D Lee; Edward V Nunes; Patricia Novo; John Rotrosen; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Preventing opioid use among justice-involved youth as they transition to adulthood: leveraging safe adults (LeSA).

Authors:  Danica Kalling Knight; Yang Yang; Elizabeth D Joseph; Elaine Tinius; Shatoya Young; Lillyan T Shelley; David R Cross; Kevin Knight
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 4.135

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.