Literature DB >> 30451397

Application of Bayesian network modeling to pathology informatics.

Agnieszka Onisko1,2, Marek J Druzdzel2,3, R Marshall Austin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the era of extensive data collection, there is a growing need for a large scale data analysis with tools that can handle many variables in one modeling framework. In this article, we present our recent applications of Bayesian network modeling to pathology informatics.
METHODS: Bayesian networks (BNs) are probabilistic graphical models that represent domain knowledge and allow investigators to process this knowledge following sound rules of probability theory. BNs can be built based on expert opinion as well as learned from accumulating data sets. BN modeling is now recognized as a suitable approach for knowledge representation and reasoning under uncertainty. Over the last two decades BN have been successfully applied to many studies on medical prognosis and diagnosis.
RESULTS: Based on data and expert knowledge, we have constructed several BN models to assess patient risk for subsequent specific histopathologic diagnoses and their related prognosis in gynecological cytopathology and breast pathology. These models include the Pittsburgh Cervical Cancer Screening Model assessing risk for histopathologic diagnoses of cervical precancer and cervical cancer, modeling of the significance of benign-appearing endometrial cells in Pap tests, diagnostic modeling to determine whether adenocarcinoma in tissue specimens is of endometrial or endocervical origin, and models to assess risk for recurrence of invasive breast carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ.
CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian network models can be used as powerful and flexible risk assessment tools on large clinical datasets and can quantitatively identify variables that are of greatest significance in predicting specific histopathologic diagnoses and their related prognosis. Resulting BN models are able to provide individualized quantitative risk assessments and prognostication for specific abnormal findings commonly reported in gynecological cytopathology and breast pathology.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian network modeling; breast pathology; cervical cancer screening; endometrial cells

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30451397     DOI: 10.1002/dc.23993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  5 in total

1.  Identifying Associations in Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Values of Escherichia coli Samples Obtained From Weaned Dairy Heifers in California Using Bayesian Network Analysis.

Authors:  Brittany L Morgan; Sarah Depenbrock; Beatriz Martínez-López
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-27

2.  Are CIN3 risk or CIN3+ risk measures reliable surrogates for invasive cervical cancer risk?

Authors:  R Marshall Austin; Agnieszka Onisko; Chengquan Zhao
Journal:  J Am Soc Cytopathol       Date:  2020-07-29

3.  PI Prob: A risk prediction and clinical guidance system for evaluating patients with recurrent infections.

Authors:  Nicholas L Rider; Gina Cahill; Tina Motazedi; Lei Wei; Ashok Kurian; Lenora M Noroski; Filiz O Seeborg; Ivan K Chinn; Kirk Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Optimization of anesthetic decision-making in ERAS using Bayesian network.

Authors:  Yuwen Chen; Yiziting Zhu; Kunhua Zhong; Zhiyong Yang; Yujie Li; Xin Shu; Dandan Wang; Peng Deng; Xuehong Bai; Jianteng Gu; Kaizhi Lu; Ju Zhang; Lei Zhao; Tao Zhu; Ke Wei; Bin Yi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-14

5.  Individualized Bayesian Risk Assessment for Cervical Squamous Neoplasia.

Authors:  Lama F Farchoukh; Agnieszka Onisko; R Marshall Austin
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2020-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.