Literature DB >> 30451347

An Exploration of the Experiences and Educational Needs of Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Cormac G Ryan1, Sam Eldabe2, Raymond Chadwick1, Susan E Jones1, Helene L Elliott-Button1, Morag Brookes2, Denis J Martin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experience of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).
METHODS: Adults with FBSS referred for SCS underwent semistructured interviews at three time points: before their SCS trial, after the trial, and three months after receiving the SCS implant. The face-to-face interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically.
RESULTS: Twelve adults (8 male, 4 female, aged 38-80 years, pain duration 1-26 years) were recruited. Six themes were identified; 1) What should I expect? 2) Varied outcomes, 3) Understanding pain and this new treatment, 4) Experiences of the SCS journey, 5) Getting used to the device, and 6) Finding out what I need to know. Participants' expectations were varied and the procedures were broadly viewed as minor surgery. Participants' expectations about SCS were not limited to pain relief and included reductions in medication, better sleep, and increased physical activity. Participants' understanding of pain and how SCS purports to work was limited. Throughout the process, practical challenges were identified such as the surgical wound management and battery recharging. Participants received information from multiple sources and identified a range of key information needs including a quick-start guide on how to operate the device and a list of dos and don'ts.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, participants' understanding of SCS was limited. The value participants placed on understanding of the process varied markedly. A list of practical informational needs has been identified. Bespoke, user-friendly, informational tools should be developed from this list to enhance the patient experience of SCS.
© 2018 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failed back surgery syndrome; neuromodulation; patient experience; qualitative research spinal cord stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30451347     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  4 in total

Review 1.  Patient Selection for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Treatment of Pain: Sequential Decision-Making Model - A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Lisa Goudman; Philippe Rigoard; Maxime Billot; Rui V Duarte; Sam Eldabe; Maarten Moens
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.832

2.  Changes in quantitative sensory testing and patient perspectives following spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndrome: An observational study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Yannick J G M Plantaz; Robert T M van Dongen; Richard L Witkam; Kris C P Vissers; Hans Timmerman
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.651

3.  To Trial or Not to Trial Before Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: The Patients' View From the TRIAL-STIM Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Raymond Chadwick; Rebekah McNaughton; Sam Eldabe; Ganesan Baranidharan; Jill Bell; Morag Brookes; Rui V Duarte; Jenny Earle; Ashish Gulve; Rachel Houten; Susan Jowett; Anu Kansal; Shelley Rhodes; Jennifer Robinson; Sara Griffiths; Rod S Taylor; Simon Thomson; Harbinder Sandhu
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-12-01

4.  Experiences From the Patient Perspective on Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Qualitatively Driven Mixed Method Analysis.

Authors:  Richard L Witkam; Erkan Kurt; Robert van Dongen; Inge Arnts; Monique A H Steegers; Kris C P Vissers; Dylan J H A Henssen; Yvonne Engels
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-09-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.