| Literature DB >> 30450382 |
Abstract
In this review, we will discuss the safety of repeated treatments with ketamine for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), a condition in which patients with major depression do not show any clinical improvements following treatments with at least two antidepressant drugs. We will discuss the effects of these treatments in both sexes at different developmental periods. Numerous small clinical studies have shown that a single, low-dose ketamine infusion can rapidly alleviate depressive symptoms and thoughts of suicidality in patients with TRD, and these effects can last for about one week. Interestingly, the antidepressant effects of ketamine can be prolonged with intermittent, repeated infusion regimens and produce more robust therapeutic effects when compared to a single infusion. The safety of such repeated treatments with ketamine has not been thoroughly investigated. Although more studies are needed, some clinical and preclinical reports indicated that repeated infusions of low doses of ketamine may have addictive properties, and suggested that adolescent and adult female subjects may be more sensitive to ketamine's addictive effects. Additionally, during ketamine infusions, many TRD patients report hallucinations and feelings of dissociation and depersonalization, and therefore the effects of repeated treatments of ketamine on cognition must be further examined. Some clinical reports indicated that, compared to women, men are more sensitive to the psychomimetic effects of ketamine. Preclinical studies extended these findings to both adolescent and adult male rodents and showed that male rodents at both developmental periods are more sensitive to ketamine's cognitive-altering effects. Accordingly, in this review we shall focus our discussion on the potential addictive and cognitive-impairing effects of repeated ketamine infusions in both sexes at two important developmental periods: adolescence and adulthood. Although more work about the safety of ketamine is warranted, we hope this review will bring some answers about the safety of treating TRD with repeated ketamine infusions.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30450382 PMCID: PMC6236511 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2018.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurobiol Stress ISSN: 2352-2895
Summary of the addictive properties of low-dose ketamine in rodents and molecular correlates. Female adolescent and adult rodents are more sensitive to the locomotor-activating effects of ketamine. The reinforcing properties of ketamine in females are mediated by the presence of ovarian hormones.
| Sex | Age | Dose | R.O.A. | Treatment Regimen | Behavioral Response | Molecular Change | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Adult | 100 μg per inf | i.v. | 1x/4 days | ↑ FR1 self-administration | n/a | ( |
| ↑ cue-induced reinstatement | |||||||
| 2.5 mg/kg | i.p. | 1x/2 days | no change | ↑NAc ΔfosB | ( | ||
| Weekly | no change | ↑ NAc shell spines | ( | ||||
| 5 mg/kg | i.p. | Daily | ↑ locomotor sensitization | n/a | ( | ||
| ↑ CPP | |||||||
| 1x/2 days | ↑ locomotor sensitization | ↑NAc ΔfosB | ( | ||||
| Weekly | ↑ locomotor sensitization | ↑ NAc ΔfosB | ( | ||||
| ↑ NAc GluA1 | |||||||
| ↑ NAc BDNF | |||||||
| ↑ NAc CaMKIIα | |||||||
| ↑ NAc shell spines | |||||||
| 10 mg/kg | i.p. | Daily | ↑ locomotor sensitization | n/a | ( | ||
| ↑ CPP | n/a | ( | |||||
| 1x/2 days | ↑ locomotor sensitization | ↑ NAc ΔfosB | ( | ||||
| ↑ CPP | |||||||
| Female | Adult | 100 μg per inf | i.v. | 1x/4 days | ↑ FR1 self-administration (proestrous) | n/a | ( |
| ↑cue-induced reinstatement (proestrous) | |||||||
| ↓FR1 self-administration (diestrous) | |||||||
| ↓ cue-induced reinstatement (diestrous) | |||||||
| 2.5 mg/kg | i.p. | 1x/2 days | no change | ↑NAc ΔfosB | ( | ||
| Weekly | ↑ locomotor sensitization (diestrous) | ↑ NAc shell spines | ( | ||||
| 5 mg/kg | i.p. | 1x/2 days | ↑ locomotor sensitization | ↑NAc ΔfosB | ( | ||
| ↓ CPP | |||||||
| Weekly | ↑ locomotor sensitization | ↑ NAc GluA1 | ( | ||||
| ↓ CPP (diestrous) | ↑ NAc core spines | ||||||
| ↑ NAc shell spines | |||||||
| 10 mg/kg | i.p. | Daily | ↑ locomotor sensitization | n/a | ( | ||
| 1x/2 days | ↑ locomotor sensitization | ↑NAc ΔfosB | ( | ||||
| Male | Adolescent | 10 mg/kg | i.p. | Daily | no change | n/a | (Wiley et al., 2007) |
| 20 mg/kg | i.p. | Daily | ↑ locomotor sensitization no change in CPP | n/a | ( | ||
| n/a | ( | ||||||
| Female | Adolescent | 10 mg/kg | i.p. | Daily | ↑ locomotor sensitization | n/a | ( |
(inf = infusion; i.p. = intraperitoneal; CPP = conditioned place preference; NAc = nucleus accumbens; GluA1 = AMPA receptor 1; CaMKIIα = calcium calmodulin kinase II alpha).
Fig. 1Schematic representing the inverse relationship between the level of ketamine-induced antidepressant response and cognitive deficits experienced during a ketamine infusion. When administered a single, low-dose ketamine infusion (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.), patients exhibiting fewer cognitive impairments experience an increased antidepressant response. (TRD = treatment resistant depression).
Summary of the cognitive-impairing effects of ketamine and their molecular correlates. Male adolescent and adult rodents are more sensitive to ketamine-induced impairments in memory. Ovarian hormones protect against ketamine-induced cognitive impairments.
| Sex | Age | Dose | Treatment Regimen | Stress | Behavioral response | Molecular effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Adult | 5 mg/kg | sub-chronic | NS | n/a | ↑ CA3 caspace 3 activation | ( |
| ↓ PPI | ↑ HPC oxidative stress | ( | |||||
| ↓ y-maze | |||||||
| 10 mg/kg | acute | NS | ↓ 5-CSRTT time | n/a | ( | ||
| CUS | rescued ASST deficit | n/a | ( | ||||
| 20 mg/kg | chronic | NS | ↑ radial arm maze latency | ↓ HPC EAAT2 expression | ( | ||
| Female | Adult | 5 mg/kg | sub-chronic | NS | ↑ PPI in proestrous | n/a | ( |
| ↓ PPI in diestrous | |||||||
| ↓ y-maze in proestrous | |||||||
| ↓ y-maze in diestrous | |||||||
| 10 mg/kg | acute | NS | ↓ PPI in OVX females | n/a | ( | ||
| ↑ PPI in E2+P4 females | |||||||
| Male | Adolescent | 5 mg/kg | sub-chronic | NS | no effect on PPI | n/a | ( |
| ↓ y-maze | |||||||
| 20 mg/kg | chronic | NS | ↑ radial arm maze latency | ↓ HPC EAAT2 expression in adulthood | ( | ||
| ↑ SIT duration in adulthood | rescued with EAAT2 antagonist | ||||||
| 25 mg/kg | acute | NS | ↓ NOR | ↓ HPC LTD | ( | ||
| Female | Adolescent | 5 mg/kg | sub-chronic | NS | no effect (PPI) | n/a | ( |
| no effect (y-maze) |
(NS= non-stressed; CUS = chronic unpredictable stress; PPI = pre-pulse inhibition; 5-CSRTT = 5 choice serial reaction time test; ASST = attentional set-shifting task; OVX = ovariectomized; E2 = estrogen; P4 = progesterone; SIT = social interaction test; NOR = novel object recognition; HPC = hippocampus; EAAT2 = excitatory amino acid transporter 2; LTD = long-term depression.