Contrary to conventional research animals, horses naturally develop asthma, a disease in which the extracellular matrix of the lung plays a significant role. Hence, the horse lung extracellular matrix appears to be an ideal candidate model for in vitro studying the mechanisms and potential treatments for asthma. However, so far, such model to study cell-extracellular matrix interactions in asthma has not been developed. The aim of this study was to establish a protocol for equine lung decellularization that maintains the architecture of the extracellular matrix and could be used in the future as an in vitro model for therapeutic treatment in asthma. For this the equine lungs were decellularized by sodium dodecyl sulfate detergent perfusion at constant gravitational pressure of 30 cmH2O. Lung scaffolds were assessed by immunohistochemistry (collagen I, III, IV, laminin, and fibronectin), scanning electron microscopy, and DNA quantification. Their mechanical property was assessed by measuring lung compliance using the super-syringe technique. The optimized protocol of lung equine decellularization was effective to remove cells (19.8 ng/mg) and to preserve collagen I, III, IV, laminin, and fibronectin. Moreover, scanning electron microscopy analysis demonstrated maintained microscopic lung structures. The decellularized lungs presented lower compliance compared to native lung. In conclusion we described a reproducible decellularization protocol that can produce an acellular equine lung feasible for the future development of novel treatment strategies in asthma.
Contrary to conventional research animals, horses naturally develop asthma, a disease in which the extracellular matrix of the lung plays a significant role. Hence, the horse lung extracellular matrix appears to be an ideal candidate model for in vitro studying the mechanisms and potential treatments for asthma. However, so far, such model to study cell-extracellular matrix interactions in asthma has not been developed. The aim of this study was to establish a protocol for equine lung decellularization that maintains the architecture of the extracellular matrix and could be used in the future as an in vitro model for therapeutic treatment in asthma. For this the equine lungs were decellularized by sodium dodecyl sulfate detergent perfusion at constant gravitational pressure of 30 cmH2O. Lung scaffolds were assessed by immunohistochemistry (collagen I, III, IV, laminin, and fibronectin), scanning electron microscopy, and DNA quantification. Their mechanical property was assessed by measuring lung compliance using the super-syringe technique. The optimized protocol of lung equine decellularization was effective to remove cells (19.8 ng/mg) and to preserve collagen I, III, IV, laminin, and fibronectin. Moreover, scanning electron microscopy analysis demonstrated maintained microscopic lung structures. The decellularized lungs presented lower compliance compared to native lung. In conclusion we described a reproducible decellularization protocol that can produce an acellular equine lung feasible for the future development of novel treatment strategies in asthma.
According to World Health Organization,[1] 235 million people currently suffer from asthma and 383,000 deaths are
attributed to this disease each year. The prevalence of asthma is continuing to
grow, and the overall prevalence is estimated to increase up to 100 million at 2025.[1] In this context, intensive scientific efforts to understand the disease and
to find new treatments are required. However, it is important to note that some
therapeutic strategies for asthma previously derived from animal models in mice and
rats have been failed when translated to human.[2-4] A reason explaining this
deceiving result is differential different transcriptional responses to acute
inflammatory in rodents and humans.[5] Interestingly, horses naturally develop an asthma-like condition currently
known as recurrent airway obstruction (RAO), severe equineasthma,[6] and inflammatory airway disease (IAD), a mild-to-moderate asthma.[7] Therefore, asthma in the horse seems to be an unique animal model for better
understanding the pathways implicated in this disease[8] as demonstrated in Table
1.
Table 1.
Merits and demerits between asthma models (pig, guinea pig, horse, and
mouse).
Species
Disease models
Merits
Demerits
Pig
Induced by ovalbumina and spontaneous disease
• Anatomy, biochemistry, physiology, size, and genetics of pigs
resemble those of humans
• To establish chronic asthma model is difficult because the
sensitivity to the antigen declines after repeated allergen
exposure
Guinea pig
Induced by ovalbumina, ozone, viral infections, and spontaneous
disease
• Good for lung function studies;• Neuroendocrine
cells and neuroepithelial bodies are also localized to the
epithelium like in humans;• Airway smooth muscle
closely resembles human airway smooth muscle.
• Spontaneous respiratory inflammation has not been fully
explored;• Due to the size of the airways and the
limited number of cells recoverable, few studies of muscle
proliferation and/or muscle synthesizing activity have been
completed;• Axon reflex is improbable to be present in
human airways.
Mouse
Induced by ovalbumina, house dust mite, cockroach, and fungal
extracts
• Have contributed to our understanding of the T1/T2 disease
paradigm
• Mouse and human eosinophils differ significantly from one
another at molecular level;• Differences in lung size,
structure, and physiologic responses;• Several
compounds effective in rodent models of allergic airways disease
were found to be ineffective as therapy for both RAO and human
asthma.
Horse
Spontaneous disease
• Parallel mechanisms of human asthma disease;• RAO
includes airway inflammation with neutrophil predominance, while
IAD, is a related disorder with a mixed neutrophil/eosinophil
phenotype;• Ability to perform serial bronchoscopies,
tissue biopsies, and determination of lung volumes by
spirometry, both measurements are impractical in
rodents;• The equine genome has been sequenced, and an
equine tissue bank has been developed for lung research.
• Asthma with fixed airflow limitation and obesity has
insufficient evidence in horse
Merits and demerits between asthma models (pig, guinea pig, horse, and
mouse).RAO: recurrent airway obstruction; IAD: inflammatory airway disease.Asthma is characterized by chronic airway inflammation which induces an abnormal
extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition resulting in irreversible structural lung
damage.[9,10] Unfortunately, the specific anti-remodeling treatments of
asthma are still a scientific challenge[10] requiring a better understanding of ECM remodeling for future treatments. It
is remarkable that prolonged use of corticosteroids or combination therapy in asthma
interferes on ECM elements.[11] It is remarkable that the ECM is an ideal candidate model for establishing an
in vitro setting for research due to three-dimensional architecture, the biochemical
composition, and the important role in the regulation of cell function and tissue regeneration.[12]In recent years, lung bioengineering had been emerged as a potential future
therapeutic alternative for treatment of respiratory diseases.[13-16] The current approach to lung
bioengineering is based on using the decellularized organ matrix. In addition to
being used for applications such as repair and reconstruction,[13,17] the
decellularized lung matrix has been a useful tool to study cell–matrix interactions
in lung disease.[18] Furthermore, decellularized organ scaffolds are used as in vitro ECM model
reproducing the in vivo cell microenvironment thereby becoming a powerful model for
studying the comprehensive roles of ECM in lung diseases[19] and new approach for finding therapeutic solutions. However, obtaining a
suitable lung decellularized matrix for studying mechanisms such as repair or
cell–matrix interactions, it is required to preserve the native airway and vascular
structure and retain key ECM components, which requires a fine-tuned
decellularization protocol. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish a
protocol for equine lung decellularization for obtaining well-preserved ECM
architecture for being used as a novel in vitro model for better understanding and
treating asthma.
Methods
The experimental procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal
Research of the University of São Paulo and carried out in accordance with the
National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH
Publications no. 8023, revised 1978).
Animals
Animal tissue specimens were collected from the lungs of six healthy horses that
had been slaughtered at the Veterinary Hospital from the University of São
Paulo. All horses from which lungs were obtained had been declared as healthy by
the state veterinarian or an inspector under the supervision of the veterinarian
within 24 h prior to death. Lungs were excised within 30 min after sacrifice and
stored at −80°C until the decellularization process was carried out.
Lung decellularization
Prior to starting the decellularization process, the accessory lobe of each lung
was selected and placed into the experimental system with at a constant pressure
of 30 cmH2O (Figure
1). The lung lobe were washed three times via the airways and three
times via the vasculature by instilling 5 L of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
1× containing streptomycin (90 mg/mL), penicillin (50 U/mL), and amphotericin B
(25 mg/mL) until the liquid extracted from the lungs had a transparent
appearance. This step was repeated with 2 L de-ionizedwater and subsequently
treated with instillation of 4 L 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) detergent. The
lung lobes were subsequently kept in agitation for 24 h at room temperature in a
4-L plastic bucket, with 1 L of 1% SDS; and this process was repeated for 3
days. At day 5, the lung lobes were rinsed again with 5 L PBS 1× (with the
antibiotic/antimycotic components described above) and maintained in 1 L PBS 1×
in agitation for 24 h to finish the process for obtaining acellular lung
scaffolds. All the rinses were instilled until the lung lobe was fully inflated.
At this point, we stopped the instillation and the lobes were allowed to
passively drain and are also manually manipulated to assist the removal of the
liquid before proceeding with the next filling to avoid high-pressure-induced
damage.
Figure 1.
Schematic illustration of the system for equine lung
decellularization.
Schematic illustration of the system for equine lung
decellularization.
Decellularization assessment
Three native and three decellularized lungs were fixed by submersion in 4%
paraformaldehyde for at least 3 h at room temperature, embedded in paraffin,
sliced into 5 μm sections, and mounted on glass slides. Following
deparaffinization, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in
order to verify the absence of cellular DNA and with colloidal iron for
assessing ECM structure (collagen, glycosaminoglycans, and cytoplasm) after the
decellularization process. The images were captured using Nikon Eclipse 80I
microscope, ensuring that the various areas of the sample are cell-free after
decellularization.In addition, the level of remaining DNA in the scaffold after the
decellularization procedure was measured in three randomly selected
decellularized lungs and in two native lungs. A sample of small piece from the
accessory lobe was dried and weighted, and its total genomic DNA was isolated
using the spin-column-based PureLink® Genomic DNA Mini Kit
(Invitrogen™) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Double-stranded DNA
yield was measured using spectrophotometry (NanoDrop 1000; Thermo Scientific)
and normalized to sample tissue weight.To perform immunohistochemistry imaging, paraffin-embedded samples of the lung
(5-mm thick) obtained from each group were sectioned in microtome (#RM2265;
Leica) and transferred to poly-l-lysine (#p8920; Sigma) treated glass
slides. The sections were rehydrated and microwaved in citrate buffer (1.83 mM
of monohydrate citric acid and 8.9 mM of sodium citrate tribasic dehydrate; pH
6.0) for antigen retrieval. The endogenous peroxidase block was performed with
3% hydrogen peroxide in distillated water for 30 min in the dark. Nonspecific
protein interaction was blocked with 2% of bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for
30 min. Primary antibodies such as anti-collagen I (#600-401-103 S, 1:400;
Rockland), anti-collagen III (#sc-8779, 1:100; Santa Cruz), anti-collagen IV
(#1-CO083-0, 1:500; Quartett), anti-laminin subunit alpha-2 (#bs-8561R, 1:200;
Bioss Antibodies), and anti-fibronectin (#NBP1-91258, 1:200; Novus Biologicals)
were incubated overnight in humid chamber at 4°. The reaction was detected by
Dako Advance HRP (#K6068; Dako) and the color developed with DAB (#K3468; Dako)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The slides were lightly
counter-stained with hematoxylin. Between each step, after antibody incubation,
the slides were rinsed in PBS containing 0.2% of BSA. Finally, slides were
mounted and visualized at Nikon Eclipse 80I microscope.For quantifying collagen area, the tissue samples were fixed with 10% buffered
formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with picrosirius red. The stained
sections were imaged at high (×200) magnification with a Nikon Eclipse 80I
microscope. A total of 12 fields from each stained section were analyzed using
ZEN Blue 2.3 software (Carl Zeiss). As shown in Figure 6, the collagen was stained with
red and the collagen area was obtained from a combination of SD from mean signal
and isodata automatic thresholding.
Figure 6.
Immunohistochemistry images of native and decellularized equine lung slices
stained for different components of the extracellular matrix (collagen I,
III, IV, fibronectin, and elastin). Scale bar = 100 µm.
Scanning electron microscopy
Slices of the decellularized lungs and control were prepared for imaging. The
samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde
and 2.5% paraformaldehyde in 0.1-M cacodylate buffer (EMD Biosciences) for 2 h
at room temperature, rinsed in cacodylate buffer, and dehydrated through an
ethanol gradient. The samples were further dehydrated in hexamethyldisilizane
for 10 min and dried overnight, sputter-coated with gold, and analyzed using the
scanning electron microscope Hitachi Analytical Table Top Microscope TM3000
(Hitachi) with 15-kVa acceleration.
Measurement of lung compliance
Compliance was assessed as the volume–pressure ratio from values obtained using
the super-syringe technique.[20] This method consists of inflating of the lung lobe in steps of 100 mL
with a syringe until a volume of 1000 mL. Airway inflation pressure was measured
with a water column in cmH20 with reference to atmospheric
pressure.
Acellular lung matrix scaffold recellularization
To confirm whether decellularized horse lung can be recellularized and to verify
the adhesion molecules, we used two different cell types. Horse dermal
fibroblasts were harvested, cultured, and characterized as previously described.[21] An amount of 5 × 104 fibroblasts were plated on untreated
plates (Sarstedt) containing slices of horse lung scaffolds for 5 days. In
addition, canine yolk sac cells transduced with vascular endothelial growth
factor–enhanced green fluorescent protein (VEGFeGFP; yolk sac VEGF (YSVEGF))
previously characterized by our group[22] were seeded (5 × 104 cells) on untreated plates (Sarstedt)
containing slices of horse lung scaffolds for 5 days.
Immunocytochemistry
The plates containing the fibroblast or YS/YSVEGF cells and scaffolds were fixed
with 4% paraformaldehyde. The scaffolds were washed with PBS + 0.5% Tween and
incubated with the primary antibody fibronectin (Abcam) at 1:200 dilution. Then,
the fibroblast and YS/YSVEGF cells were washed in PBS + 0.5% Tween and the
secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 594 (Thermo Fisher). To investigate cell adhesion
on scaffold, the following biomarkers were used: N-cadherin and CD31. Plates
were incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear labeling.
Samples were analyzed on Confocal Microscope—Olympus Fluoview 1000 (FV1000).
Statistical analysis
The values are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Values of lung compliance,
DNA quantification, and collagen area (%) between native and decellularized lung
values were evaluated by means of paired t-tests. Statistical significance was
considered when p < 0.05.
Results
As expected from previous studies from mice lung,[23] our protocol based on constant-pressure decellularization media perfusion did
not result in alterations in terms of maintenance of scaffold structure and
composition of main ECM component after lung decellularization (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Representative example of (a) an intact and (b) a decellularized equine
lung.
Representative example of (a) an intact and (b) a decellularized equine
lung.Lung scaffolds obtained by decellularization showed genomic DNA content in the 17.75
± 2.05 ng/mg (below the 50 ng/mg suggested by Crapo et al.[24]) (Figure 3(a)) and
lacked cellular nuclei assessed by H&E (Figure 4).
Figure 3.
(a) DNA quantification before and after equine lung decellularization. (b)
Lung compliance before and after decellularization. (c) Pressure/volume
(P/V) values assessed using the super-syringe technique with inflation of
the lungs in steps of 100 mL up to 1 L. Native lung is represented as [—]
and decellularized lung as [—]. Data are represented as mean ± SE.
Figure 4.
Representative native and decellularized equine lung tissue, as visualized by
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), colloidal iron stain, and SEM images.
Sections indicate maintenance of tissue architecture, ECM, removal of debris
and blood, and lack of visible nuclear material.
(a) DNA quantification before and after equine lung decellularization. (b)
Lung compliance before and after decellularization. (c) Pressure/volume
(P/V) values assessed using the super-syringe technique with inflation of
the lungs in steps of 100 mL up to 1 L. Native lung is represented as [—]
and decellularized lung as [—]. Data are represented as mean ± SE.Representative native and decellularized equine lung tissue, as visualized by
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), colloidal iron stain, and SEM images.
Sections indicate maintenance of tissue architecture, ECM, removal of debris
and blood, and lack of visible nuclear material.As shown in Figure 5, the
collagen area was lower in decellularized lungs (3.70 ± 0.46) as compared with
native lungs (13.43 ± 1.67), and the components of the ECM such as
glycosaminoglycans (Figure
4), elastin, fibronectin, and collagen I, III, and IV remained similar in
both groups (Figure 6).
Furthermore, observation by SEM showed that the microscopic lung structures were
also well maintained (Figure
5).
Figure 5.
Representative histological analysis for collagen quantification of (a)
native and (b) decellularized equine lung tissue. The lung tissue samples
were stained with picrosirius red (red = collagen). Bar graph shows collagen
area (%). Asterisk indicates significance of difference between the groups
(*p < 0.005; **p < 0.05).
Representative histological analysis for collagen quantification of (a)
native and (b) decellularized equine lung tissue. The lung tissue samples
were stained with picrosirius red (red = collagen). Bar graph shows collagen
area (%). Asterisk indicates significance of difference between the groups
(*p < 0.005; **p < 0.05).Immunohistochemistry images of native and decellularized equine lung slices
stained for different components of the extracellular matrix (collagen I,
III, IV, fibronectin, and elastin). Scale bar = 100 µm.Pressure–volume measured (Figure
3(b)) showed that decellularized lungs were stiffer than native lungs, as
indicated by decreased compliance (native: 12.32 ± 0.92 vs decellularized: 7.04 ±
0.81 mL/cmH2O) and P/V values (Figure 3(c)).The immunocytochemical analysis confirmed the presence of YSVEGF and fibroblast cells
in the acellular equine lung matrix (Figures 7, 8, 9 and 10).
Figure 7.
Immunocytochemistry of equine lung scaffolds with YSVEGF. (a) DAPI nuclei
YSVEGF cells in scaffold of equine lung; (b) marked presence of YSVEGF cells
expressing eGFP; (c) scaffold of lung expressing fibronectin in red; (d)
presence of these cells in the scaffold in red that expresses fibronectin is
very clear, proving the efficient recellularization.
Figure 8.
Immunocytochemistry of equine lung scaffolds with fibroblast cells. (a) DAPI
nuclei of fibroblast cells; (b) marked presence of fibroblast cells
expressing CD90 in green; (c) marked presence in lung sacffold of expressing
fibronectin in red; (d) presence of these cells in the scaffold that
expresses proving the efficient recellularization.
Figure 9.
Immunofluorescence of equine lung scaffolds for expression of N-cadherin, a
biomarker for adhesion cell. (a) DAPI nuclei of fibroblast cells; (b)
expression of N-cadherin; (c) presence in equine lung scaffold of DAPI and
N-cadherin; (d) DAPI nuclei of YSVEGF; and (e) expression of N-cadherin; (f)
presence in equine lung scaffold of DAPI and N-cadherin.
Figure 10.
Immunofluorescence of equine lung scaffolds for expression of CD31, a
biomarker for adhesion cell. (a) DAPI nuclei of fibroblast cells and (b)
expression of CD31; (c) presence in equine lung scaffold of DAPI and
CD31.
Immunocytochemistry of equine lung scaffolds with YSVEGF. (a) DAPI nuclei
YSVEGF cells in scaffold of equine lung; (b) marked presence of YSVEGF cells
expressing eGFP; (c) scaffold of lung expressing fibronectin in red; (d)
presence of these cells in the scaffold in red that expresses fibronectin is
very clear, proving the efficient recellularization.Immunocytochemistry of equine lung scaffolds with fibroblast cells. (a) DAPI
nuclei of fibroblast cells; (b) marked presence of fibroblast cells
expressing CD90 in green; (c) marked presence in lung sacffold of expressing
fibronectin in red; (d) presence of these cells in the scaffold that
expresses proving the efficient recellularization.Immunofluorescence of equine lung scaffolds for expression of N-cadherin, a
biomarker for adhesion cell. (a) DAPI nuclei of fibroblast cells; (b)
expression of N-cadherin; (c) presence in equine lung scaffold of DAPI and
N-cadherin; (d) DAPI nuclei of YSVEGF; and (e) expression of N-cadherin; (f)
presence in equine lung scaffold of DAPI and N-cadherin.Immunofluorescence of equine lung scaffolds for expression of CD31, a
biomarker for adhesion cell. (a) DAPI nuclei of fibroblast cells and (b)
expression of CD31; (c) presence in equine lung scaffold of DAPI and
CD31.
Discussion
We believe that this work will be relevant for future studies in the field of lung
diseases. Considering that lung diseases in horses such as asthma present
similarities to human, it becomes an ideal model for studying mechanism and
treatment in asthma using the decellularized ECM as an in vivo model. The
decellularized lung can be used for repair, reconstruction, and to study cell–matrix
interactions in lung disease.[13,18] Therefore, we demonstrated in
this study that our protocol created an optimal lung scaffold with the necessary
balance between removal of the native cell population and maintaining the pulmonary
structures.Acellular lung scaffold from large animal seems to be ideal for translation into
clinical studies in humans[25,26] when compared to rodent models.[5] Experimental large animals more used for lung decellularization protocol are porcine[27] and non-human primate,[25,26] which these models offer the
advantage of closely resembling the biology of humans.[26] By contrast, this is the first study to date using equine lung for creating
an organ scaffold. This large animal model presents similarities with humanneutrophilic asthma[28] including the remodeling of ECM and similar biology.[29] Considering that many experiments are not possible in humans because of
ethical considerations, use of this model can be a milestone in the field of
respiratory diseases.Several techniques of lung decellularization have been developed in the last years,
which retain ECM proteins and three-dimensional architecture.[13-16,23] The approach frequently
utilized is detergent-based decellularization including SDS, Triton X100, sodium
deoxycholate (SDC), and 3-((3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate
(CHAPS). In this work, we based our lung decellularization process in previous
studies using SDS 1%,[23,30-32] which is a
cheap detergent and more efficient for removing cell residue tissue and increased
ECM retention when compared to other detergents.[33,34] Given that it resulted in a
residual DNA level less than 50 ng of DNA per 1 mg of dry weight of the ECM scaffold
(19.8 ng/mg), the protocol employed for equine lung decellularization seems suitable.[24]Other criteria defining adequate decellularization of scaffolds address retainment of
specific ECM components (collagen I, III, IV, laminin, fibronectin, and
glycosaminoglycans) and maintenance of structures.[35] Collagen I is a major component of the ECM and along with collagen IV is a
critical component of fibrillar basement membrane for lung transplantation after decelullarizatiion.[36] Collagen III is the second most abundant collagen type and provides the
structure of the pulmonary blood vessels, alveolar wall, visceral pleura, and the
connective tissue around the tracheobronchial tree,[37] structures to be preserved for future recellularization. Laminin plays a key
role in epithelial cell matrix motility and adhesion after recelularization;[38] glycosaminoglycans is determinant of mechanical behavior of lung tissue,
while fibronectin plays a role in cell adhesion, growth, migration, and differentiation.[35] Although Petersen et al.[39] demonstrated that SDS induced a greater loss of type-1 collagen and elastin
when compared to CHAPS, Gilpin et al.[27] showed greatest preservation of ECM components in SDS-decellularized lungs in
comparison with CHAPS and SDC. We believe that concentration of SDS can have an
influence on three-dimensional maintenance, collagen, and elastin.[40] Perfusing 1% SDS solution preserved all these ECM proteins in the lung
scaffold obtained from this study thereby corroborating other published
studies.[23,31,41-43]Although our work demonstrates that the ECM retains some important proteins after
decellularization process, we found differences in relation to mechanical pulmonary
properties. Some previous studies have measured the P/V curves in decellularized
lungs in mice,[15] pig,[4] and human[16,44] models, with no previous data available for equine lungs.
Interestingly and in agreement with Price et al.,[15,16] our results indicate that
decellularized horse lungs were less compliant, that is, more stiff than native
lungs probably due to loss of surfactant and cells after
decellularization.[15,16,45]A limitation of this study was that we did not compare our decellularization equine
lung protocol with cells from other species. However, it should be noted that in
this study, to test the viability of recellularization in equine acellular lung, we
use cells obtained from different species (equine and cat) and types (fibroblast and
endothelial). Although our protocol showed a decrease in total collagen, we produced
a suitable scaffold for cell growth and adherence, similar to results obtained by
Sengyoku et al.[46] Therefore, further studies are necessary to better investigate cell seeding
and culturing on the equine decellularized lung.The approaches commonly utilized for lung decellularization include perfusion of
reagents through lung vasculature and/or airways. Previous studies demonstrated that
the perfused SDS detergent through the pulmonary artery[23,32,43] or airways[30,31,47] resulted in a
suitable acellular lung with retention of specific ECM components and removal of
cells. In this study, we infused decellularization agents through both combined
routes, vascular and airway, by applying a constant physiological pressure of 30
cmH2O. According to previous studies, monitoring constant pressure
can avoid damage triggered by manual pressure since variability between
investigators and experiments is reduced.[16,32,43,44] Specifically, this protocol by
constant pressure infusion of decellularizing agents is able to retain critical ECM
proteins and to maintain lung scaffold structure and microvasculature as indicated
by SEM analyses and immunohistochemistry (Figures 4 and 6).
Conclusion
In conclusion, we described a reproducible decellularization protocol that can
produce an equine acellular lung which is a feasible tool for the future development
of novel basic and translation research and drug-testing strategies in asthma. This
study may be very relevant in the field of lung disease modeling considering the
given unique similarities between humans and equine lungs in terms of asthma
development. Actually, equine acellular lung scaffolds can be elaborated into
commercial production lines to make available high-throughput tests in asthma
pharmacology.
Authors: John M Wallis; Zachary D Borg; Amanda B Daly; Bin Deng; Bryan A Ballif; Gilman B Allen; Diane M Jaworski; Daniel J Weiss Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Laurent Benayoun; Anne Druilhe; Marie-Christine Dombret; Michel Aubier; Marina Pretolani Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-01-16 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Laurent L Couëtil; Andrew M Hoffman; Jennifer Hodgson; Virginia Buechner-Maxwell; Laurent Viel; James L N Wood; Jean-Pierre Lavoie Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Joan E Nichols; Jean Niles; Michael Riddle; Gracie Vargas; Tuya Schilagard; Liang Ma; Kert Edward; Saverio La Francesca; Jason Sakamoto; Stephanie Vega; Marie Ogadegbe; Ronald Mlcak; Donald Deyo; Lee Woodson; Christopher McQuitty; Scott Lick; Daniel Beckles; Esther Melo; Joaquin Cortiella Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Andrew P Price; Lindsay M Godin; Alex Domek; Trevor Cotter; Jonathan D'Cunha; Doris A Taylor; Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Renata Kelly da Palma; Paula Naomi Nonaka; Noelia Campillo; Juan J Uriarte; Jessica Julioti Urbano; Daniel Navajas; Ramon Farré; Luis V F Oliveira Journal: J Biomech Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: H Tebyanian; A Karami; E Motavallian; J Aslani; A Samadikuchaksaraei; B Arjmand; M R Nourani Journal: Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 1.770
Authors: Jeremy J Song; Sam S Kim; Zhilin Liu; Joren C Madsen; Douglas J Mathisen; Joseph P Vacanti; Harald C Ott Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Adriano Jaskonis Dall'Olio; Gustavo de Sá Schiavo Matias; Ana Claudia Oliveira Carreira; Hianka Jasmyne Costa de Carvalho; Thais van den Broek Campanelli; Thamires Santos da Silva; Mônica Duarte da Silva; Ana Lúcia Abreu-Silva; Maria Angélica Miglino Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 3.748
Authors: Lies Lahousse; Thomas Bahmer; Sara Cuevas-Ocaña; Pauline Flajolet; Alexander G Mathioudakis; Melissa McDonnell; Lena Uller; Florence Schleich; Sergio Dortas Junior; Marco Idzko; Dave Singh; Fabio L M Ricciardolo; Ian M Adcock; Omar Usmani; Antonio Spanevello; Sara J Bonvini Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2020-02-17