Literature DB >> 30449981

Radiological evaluation of pelvic inlet and outlet radiographic view in Indian population.

Yugal Karkhur1, Anurag Tiwari2, Lalit Maini3, Vivek Bansal4, Abhimanyu Kakralia5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures represent one of the most challenging clinical problems in which an urgent multidisciplinary approach is required. The early management in a suspected pelvic fracture starts with the good radiological evaluation. The standard radiographic view includes the anteroposterior, inlet and outlet views. The inlet and outlet views are taken with 45° tilt from anteroposterior plane. However, recent studies have shown that there is significant individual variation within the population and these values should be redefined.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study carried out in a tertiary care teaching institute. Total 110 patients (including 42 female and 68 male patients) of age older than 18 years, who had a routine pelvic Computed Tomography (CT) scan performed for any indications unrelated to pelvic pathologies were included. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Mean and standard deviation were calculated. For each angle measured, the effect of age was determined and a comparison was made between male and female patients, p value <0.05 is considered significant.
RESULTS: The mean angle of caudal tilt for the ideal screening inlet view was 33° +/-8 (16.3-31.3) and the mean angle of cephalic tilt for the ideal screening outlet view was 56° +/-9 (51.6-81.8).
CONCLUSION: This study re-evaluated the optimal inlet and outlet angles in Indians and demonstrated that the mean angles needed to create an ideal pelvic inlet and outlet views are 33° and 56° respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inlet angle; Non orthogonal; Outlet angle; Pelvic fracture

Year:  2018        PMID: 30449981      PMCID: PMC6224698          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  5 in total

1.  Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined.

Authors:  William M Ricci; Christiaan Mamczak; Martin Tynan; Philipp Streubel; Michael Gardner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Fluoroscopic imaging guides of the posterior pelvis pertaining to iliosacral screw placement.

Authors:  Bruce H Ziran; Ajay D Wasan; David M Marks; Steven A Olson; Michael W Chapman
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-02

3.  Reexamination of pelvic inlet and outlet images using 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions.

Authors:  Murat Pekmezci; Philip Rotter; Paul Toogood; Saam Morshed; Utku Kandemir
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  Radiologic evaluation of the pelvis.

Authors:  H R Mostafavi; P Tornetta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis.

Authors:  C Boulay; C Tardieu; J Hecquet; C Benaim; B Mouilleseaux; C Marty; D Prat-Pradal; J Legaye; G Duval-Beaupère; J Pélissier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Computerised Tomography Analysis of Pelvic Inlet and Outlet Fluoroscopic View Angles.

Authors:  Deniz Aydın; Enes Sarı; Kaan Erler
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  Anatomical position of the corona mortis relative to the anteroposterior and inlet views.

Authors:  Tomoki Wada; Yoshiaki Itoigawa; Tomoko Wakejima; Akihisa Koga; Koichiro Ichimura; Yuichiro Maruyama; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.