Literature DB >> 30449979

Is nail dynamization beneficial after twelve weeks - An analysis of 37 cases.

Ramesh Perumal1, Vijay Shankar1, Rizwan Basha1, Dheenadayalan Jayaramaraju1, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although nail dynamization in femoral and tibial fractures is an effective method of promoting healing, its role beyond twelve weeks is still not clear. It is usually done two to three months following interlocking nailing. This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of late dynamization (after 12 weeks) and factors affecting union.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, thirty seven patients who underwent dynamization for reamed intramedullary interlocking nails of femur (18) and tibia (20) after twelve weeks from index surgery and with a minimum followup of six months were included. Fracture healing index was calculated using predynamization radiographs. Radiographic union was defined as osseous bridging of three cortices on followup radiographs. Dynamization failure was defined as fractures not showing progressive increase in callus on followup radiographs and those that required secondary intervention.
RESULTS: Mean age of patients at time of injury was 35.92 years (range: 16-63) with males (86.8%) predominating. Mean time to dynamization from index surgery was 19.11 weeks (range-12-36). Thirty one fractures (81.5%) went onto union after dynamization of which twelve were femoral and nineteen were tibial fractures. Mean time to union after dynamization was 6 months. Communited fractures (6-21) showed poor results with delayed dynamization compared to other anatomical types which was statistically significant (P = 0.05). Predynamization FHI of more than 1.18 had 83% sensitivity and 72% specificity in predicting fracture healing after dynamization.
CONCLUSION: Late dynamization is still beneficial in promoting healing in femoral and tibial fractures. Communited fractures showed poor results with dynamization. Predynamization FHI was an important predictor of fracture healing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delayed union; Dynamization; Femur; Tibia

Year:  2017        PMID: 30449979      PMCID: PMC6224625          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  19 in total

Review 1.  Femoral nonunion: risk factors and treatment options.

Authors:  Joseph R Lynch; Lisa A Taitsman; David P Barei; Sean E Nork
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Interlocking nailing of complex fractures of the femur and tibia.

Authors:  K W Klemm; M Börner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Effects of the dynamization of static bolt nailing. In vivo experimentation].

Authors:  D Dagrenat; N Moncade; J Cordey; B A Rahn; I Kempf; S M Perren
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1988

Review 4.  The rationales of interlocking nailing of the femur, tibia, and humerus.

Authors:  R J Brumback
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Accelerated bone healing and excessive callus formation in patients with femoral fracture and head injury.

Authors:  P V Giannoudis; S Mushtaq; P Harwood; S Kambhampati; M Dimoutsos; Z Stavrou; H C Pape
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases.

Authors:  R A Winquist; S T Hansen; D K Clawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The treatment of nonunions following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Harri K Pihlajamäki; Sari T Salminen; Ole M Böstman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur.

Authors:  I Kempf; A Grosse; G Beck
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A small effect of weight bearing in promoting fracture healing.

Authors:  C C Wu; C H Shih
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial diaphyseal fractures and aseptic nonunions. Can we expect an optimum result?

Authors:  Byron E Chalidis; George E Petsatodis; Nick C Sachinis; Christos G Dimitriou; Anastasios G Christodoulou
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2009-08-25
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Research on the nature of micromovement and the biomechanical staging of fracture healing].

Authors:  Jinyou Shi; Yuzhou Xiao; Min Wu; Jianzhong Guan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

2.  Comparison of dynamic versus static fixation of intramedullary nailing in tibial diaphyseal fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andre Jw Loh; James R Onggo; Jason Hockings; Iswadi Damasena
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-07-19

3.  Effectiveness of Nail Dynamization in Delayed Union of Tibial Shaft Fractures: Relationship Between Fracture Morphology, Callus Diameter, and Union Rates.

Authors:  Cesar Angel Pesciallo; Germán Garabano; Leonel Perez Alamino; Tamara Leonor Dainotto; Stefano Gaggiotti; Hernán Del Sel
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 4.  Fatigue Crack Growth and Fracture of Internal Fixation Materials in In Vivo Environments-A Review.

Authors:  Kailun Wu; Bin Li; Jiong Jiong Guo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.