Literature DB >> 30449630

An apple a day? Assessing gardeners' lead exposure in urban agriculture sites to improve the derivation of soil assessment criteria.

Jane A Entwistle1, Patrick M Amaibi2, John R Dean2, Michael E Deary3, Daniel Medock4, Jackie Morton5, Ilia Rodushkin6, Lindsay Bramwell7.   

Abstract

Globally, many of our urban agriculture sites (UAS) contain high levels of lead (Pb), a contaminant of toxicological concern to humans. To improve the derivation of soil assessment criteria at UAS, and avoid inappropriate closure of these valuable community spaces, we sampled nearly 280 paired soil and crop samples across 31 UAS gardens. This sampling was coupled with an exposure and food frequency questionnaire and participants blood Pb levels (BLL), (43 gardeners and 29 non-gardening neighbours). In 98% of the sampled soils, Pb concentrations were above the current UK soil guideline for UAS (80 mg/kg), however despite the high soil Pb (geometric mean: 324 mg/kg), and high soil bioaccessible Pb (geometric mean: 58.7%), all participants BLL were <4.1 μg/dL (range: 0.6-4.1 μg/dL). Indeed, there was no statistically significant difference between the BLL of the UAS gardeners and those of their non-gardening neighbours (p = 0.569). Pb uptake, however, varied with crop type and our study highlights the suitability of certain crops for growing at UAS with elevated Pb (e.g. tubers, shrub and tree fruit), whilst limiting the consumption of others (selected root vegetables, such as rhubarb, beetroot, parsnips and carrots, with observed Pb concentrations > 0.1 mg/kg FW). The importance of defining the exposure scenario of a specific sub-population (i.e. UAS gardeners) is highlighted. Our preferred models predict site specific assessment criteria (SSAC) of 722-1634 mg/kg. We found fruit and vegetable consumption rates by all participants, and not just the UAS gardeners, to be considerably higher than those currently used to derive the UK's category 4 screening levels (C4SLs). Furthermore, the soil to plant concentration factors (SPCFs) used to derive the UAS C4SL significantly over predict Pb uptake. Our study indicates it may be appropriate to develop a distinct exposure dataset for UAS. In particular we recommend the derivation of SPCFs that are reflective of urban soils, both in terms of the range of soil Pb concentrations typically observed, but also the sources (and hence human oral bioaccessibility and plant-availability) of this Pb.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood lead; Crop lead; Human health risk assessment; Lead; Urban agriculture sites; Urban soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30449630     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  6 in total

1.  Increased risk for lead exposure in children through consumption of produce grown in urban soils.

Authors:  Harris L Byers; Lindsay J McHenry; Timothy J Grundl
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  The State of Public Health Lead Policies: Implications for Urban Health Inequities and Recommendations for Health Equity.

Authors:  Alana M W LeBrón; Ivy R Torres; Enrique Valencia; Miriam López Dominguez; Deyaneira Guadalupe Garcia-Sanchez; Michael D Logue; Jun Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The Safe Urban Harvests Study: A Community-Driven Cross-Sectional Assessment of Metals in Soil, Irrigation Water, and Produce from Urban Farms and Gardens in Baltimore, Maryland.

Authors:  Sara N Lupolt; Raychel E Santo; Brent F Kim; Carrie Green; Eton Codling; Ana M Rule; Rui Chen; Kirk G Scheckel; Mariya Strauss; Abby Cocke; Neith G Little; Valerie C Rupp; Rachel Viqueira; Jotham Illuminati; Audrey Epp Schmidt; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Urban Soil Safety Policies: The Next Frontier for Mitigating Lead Exposures and Promoting Sustainable Food Production.

Authors:  Sara N Lupolt; Raychel E Santo; Brent F Kim; Thomas A Burke; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  Determinants of blood and saliva lead concentrations in adult gardeners on urban agricultural sites.

Authors:  Lindsay Bramwell; Jackie Morton; Anne-Helen Harding; Nan Lin; Jane Entwistle
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.898

Review 6.  The urban lead (Pb) burden in humans, animals and the natural environment.

Authors:  Ronnie Levin; Carolina L Zilli Vieira; Marieke H Rosenbaum; Karyn Bischoff; Daniel C Mordarski; Mary Jean Brown
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 8.431

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.