Eva Lesén1, Åse Björstad1, Ingela Björholt1, Tom Marlow1, Entela Bollano2, Marion Feuilly3, Florence Marteau3, Staffan Welin4, Anna-Karin Elf5, Viktor Johanson5. 1. a PharmaLex, formerly Nordic Health Economics AB , Gothenburg , Sweden. 2. b Department of Cardiology , Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden. 3. c Ipsen Pharma , Boulogne-Billancourt , France. 4. d Department of Endocrine Oncology , Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden. 5. e Department of Surgery , Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To quantify healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs in relation to carcinoid syndrome (CS) and carcinoid heart disease (CHD) in a real-world setting, and to provide perspective on treatment patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient data and HRU were collected retrospectively from three Swedish healthcare registers. Adult patients diagnosed with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) grade 1 or 2 and CS who purchased somatostatin analogs (SSAs), and experienced controlled (defined by SSAs use) and uncontrolled (defined by SSAs dose escalation) CS for ≥8 months during the study period were included. Patients diagnosed with CHD from the date of the GEP-NET diagnosis were included in the CHD study group. RESULTS: Overall, total HRU cost increased with uncontrolled CS and CHD. Total resource cost was 15,500€/patient during controlled CS (8 months), rising to 21,700€/patient during uncontrolled CS (8 months), representing an increase of ∼40% (6200€/patient). Costs/patient were driven mainly by SSA use, tumor-related medical interventions and examinations. The total mean cost/year of disease was 1100€/patient without CHD, compared to 4600€/patient with CHD, a difference of 3500€/patient. Excluding SSA cost burden, the main drivers of increased cost in CHD patients were surgical interventions and echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the treatment patterns and burden of uncontrolled CS symptoms and CHD using Swedish national register data. Increases in medical interventions and examinations HRU and increased SSA use suggest that SSA dose escalation alone may not effectively control the symptoms associated with uncontrolled CS, highlighting an unmet treatment need in this patient group.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs in relation to carcinoid syndrome (CS) and carcinoid heart disease (CHD) in a real-world setting, and to provide perspective on treatment patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patient data and HRU were collected retrospectively from three Swedish healthcare registers. Adult patients diagnosed with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) grade 1 or 2 and CS who purchased somatostatin analogs (SSAs), and experienced controlled (defined by SSAs use) and uncontrolled (defined by SSAs dose escalation) CS for ≥8 months during the study period were included. Patients diagnosed with CHD from the date of the GEP-NET diagnosis were included in the CHD study group. RESULTS: Overall, total HRU cost increased with uncontrolled CS and CHD. Total resource cost was 15,500€/patient during controlled CS (8 months), rising to 21,700€/patient during uncontrolled CS (8 months), representing an increase of ∼40% (6200€/patient). Costs/patient were driven mainly by SSA use, tumor-related medical interventions and examinations. The total mean cost/year of disease was 1100€/patient without CHD, compared to 4600€/patient with CHD, a difference of 3500€/patient. Excluding SSA cost burden, the main drivers of increased cost in CHD patients were surgical interventions and echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the treatment patterns and burden of uncontrolled CS symptoms and CHD using Swedish national register data. Increases in medical interventions and examinations HRU and increased SSA use suggest that SSA dose escalation alone may not effectively control the symptoms associated with uncontrolled CS, highlighting an unmet treatment need in this patient group.
Authors: Mohid S Khan; Thomas Walter; Amy Buchanan-Hughes; Emma Worthington; Lucie Keeber; Marion Feuilly; Enrique Grande Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Barbara Bober; Marek Saracyn; Maciej Kołodziej; Łukasz Kowalski; Elżbieta Deptuła-Krawczyk; Waldemar Kapusta; Grzegorz Kamiński; Olga Mozenska; Jacek Bil Journal: Clin Med Insights Cardiol Date: 2020-10-27
Authors: A Custodio; P Jimenez-Fonseca; A Carmona-Bayonas; M J Gomez; M I Del Olmo-García; I Lorenzo; J Á Díaz; N Canal; G De la Cruz; C Villabona Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 3.405