Literature DB >> 30449112

Guided by Light: Optical Control of Microtubule Gliding Assays.

Roderick P Tas, Chiung-Yi Chen, Eugene A Katrukha, Mathijs Vleugel1, Maurits Kok1, Marileen Dogterom1, Anna Akhmanova, Lukas C Kapitein.   

Abstract

Force generation by molecular motors drives biological processes such as asymmetric cell division and cell migration. Microtubule gliding assays in which surface-immobilized motor proteins drive microtubule propulsion are widely used to study basic motor properties as well as the collective behavior of active self-organized systems. Additionally, these assays can be employed for nanotechnological applications such as analyte detection, biocomputation, and mechanical sensing. While such assays allow tight control over the experimental conditions, spatiotemporal control of force generation has remained underdeveloped. Here we use light-inducible protein-protein interactions to recruit molecular motors to the surface to control microtubule gliding activity in vitro. We show that using these light-inducible interactions, proteins can be recruited to the surface in patterns, reaching a ∼5-fold enrichment within 6 s upon illumination. Subsequently, proteins are released with a half-life of 13 s when the illumination is stopped. We furthermore demonstrate that light-controlled kinesin recruitment results in reversible activation of microtubule gliding along the surface, enabling efficient control over local microtubule motility. Our approach to locally control force generation offers a way to study the effects of nonuniform pulling forces on different microtubule arrays and also provides novel strategies for local control in nanotechnological applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microtubules; motor proteins; optical control; optogenetics

Year:  2018        PMID: 30449112      PMCID: PMC6295924          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


Force generation by molecular motors on the microtubule cytoskeleton drives biological processes such as asymmetric cell division and cell migration. To better understand these processes, in vitro reconstitution assays are often used to decipher the underlying interactions and principles.[1−3] Microtubule gliding assays in which motor proteins are immobilized on the surface to propel microtubules, are a widely used example of such experiments. Applications of these assays range from studying basic properties of motor proteins to exploring collective and swarming behavior of self-organized systems.[4−8] Additionally, microtubule gliding assays are being developed for a variety of nanotechnological applications such as analyte detection, biocomputation, and mechanical sensing.[9−11] These assays have been shown to be very robust and sensitive enough to detect and analyze very small molecular fluctuations. Controlling these assays with both spatial and temporal precision has however remained a longstanding challenge. Previous studies used microfabricated or prepatterned surfaces to spatially confine, guide, and steer microtubules.[12−16] Furthermore, temporal control to activate microtubule gliding on predefined structures has been achieved through electric-field manipulation[17] and heat responsive polymer tracks,[18,19] while slow light-controlled gliding (10–20 nm/s) of actin filaments has been achieved using engineered myosin motors.[20] Additionally, control of microtubule gliding has been achieved using a light-to-heat converting layer in combination with heat-responsive polymers that compact upon heating and allow access of microtubules to surface-attached motors.[21] Furthermore, azobenzene switches fused to inhibitory peptides have been used to control kinesin-dependent motility with light.[22,23] However, the majority of these approaches requires extensive surface modifications or complicated molecular engineering, leaving simultaneous spatial and temporal control of force generation on nonpredefined patterns underdeveloped. Here we report local activation of microtubule gliding by direct light-inducible recruitment of kinesins to the surface (Figure ). Previously, it has been shown that tunable, light-controlled interacting protein tags (TULIPs) can be efficiently used for light-induced heterodimerization to control intracellular protein recruitment and intracellular transport.[24,25] The interaction is based on the unfolding of the Jα-helix from the LOVpep core to interact with an engineered PDZ (ePDZ) domain upon blue light illumination.[24,26] We argued that light-inducible interactions based on TULIPs can be used to reversibly control local protein recruitment in vitro. Therefore, we generated recombinant proteins fused to TULIPs to induce local heterodimerization under the control of blue light (Figure ). We demonstrate that purified recombinant ePDZ-tagged proteins can be recruited to the coverslip with high spatiotemporal precision. Furthermore, upon recruitment of kinesin-ePDZ, microtubule gliding could be reversibly induced. This approach allows for spatiotemporal control of microtubule gliding on homogeneously coated surfaces providing an adaptive platform to manipulate microtubule motility.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the experimental assay for light-controlled microtubule propulsion. The LOVpep domain undergoes a conformational change upon illumination with blue light, which facilitates the binding of Kinesin-mCherry-ePDZ and induces controlled microtubule gliding.

Schematic representation of the experimental assay for light-controlled microtubule propulsion. The LOVpep domain undergoes a conformational change upon illumination with blue light, which facilitates the binding of Kinesin-mCherry-ePDZ and induces controlled microtubule gliding. First, to test whether the TULIP based interactions are sufficient for spatiotemporal control of protein recruitment in vitro, we designed an optical readout of ePDZ recruitment to the surface. We purified the LOVpep fused to biotin, which was immobilized on a microscopy coverslip functionalized with PLL–PEG–biotin and streptavidin. Subsequently, local blue light application was used to recruit purified ePDZ-mCherry from solution (Figure A). Indeed, when a small square region was briefly exposed to blue laser light we observed an ∼5-fold enrichment of ePDZ-mCherry in that region, compared to an ∼1.2-fold increase in a region 15 μm away from the activation light. Upon arrest of illumination, complete dissociation of ePDZ-mCherry was observed (Movie S1, Figure B,D). This could be efficiently repeated for multiple cycles where maximum recruitment was reached within ∼6 s and dissociation rapidly occurred with a half-life of ∼13 s in the illuminated area (Figure C,D). Furthermore, protein recruitment was not limited to a single shape but could be structured into a variety of patterns (Figure E,F). Thus, these light-induced interactions allow for sequential, reversible, and custom patterning in situ with high contrast and precision.
Figure 2

Spatiotemporal control of protein recruitment through light-induced heterodimerization. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental setup to recruit ePDZ-mCherry to the coverslip. (B) Locality and reversibility of ePDZ-mCherry surface binding using patterned blue light. (C) Background-corrected average intensity traces for a similar movie as shown in B. Intensities over time were measured in the illumintated square (black line) and in the nonilluminated corner of the field of view ∼20 μm apart (gray line). Single light pulses were given after 60 and 260 s. (D) Fold-increase of ePDZ-mCherry upon illumination in the illuminated center and the nonilluminated corner of the field of view of seven traces of three independent experiments. Median/IQR. (E) Repetitive ePDZ-mCherry recruitment in different patterns during the same acquisition. See also Movie S1. (F) Background corrected line scan along the yellow line indicated in D. Scale bars: 5 μm.

Spatiotemporal control of protein recruitment through light-induced heterodimerization. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental setup to recruit ePDZ-mCherry to the coverslip. (B) Locality and reversibility of ePDZ-mCherry surface binding using patterned blue light. (C) Background-corrected average intensity traces for a similar movie as shown in B. Intensities over time were measured in the illumintated square (black line) and in the nonilluminated corner of the field of view ∼20 μm apart (gray line). Single light pulses were given after 60 and 260 s. (D) Fold-increase of ePDZ-mCherry upon illumination in the illuminated center and the nonilluminated corner of the field of view of seven traces of three independent experiments. Median/IQR. (E) Repetitive ePDZ-mCherry recruitment in different patterns during the same acquisition. See also Movie S1. (F) Background corrected line scan along the yellow line indicated in D. Scale bars: 5 μm. Next, we tested whether we could efficiently induce microtubule gliding activity by recruitment of an ePDZ domain fused to kinesin (Figure ). After immobilization of biotin-LOVpep to the coverslip, rhodamine-labeled microtubules and kinesins were added to the reaction solution. Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) imaging was then used to image the microtubules close to the surface in the absence and presence of a global 200 ms blue light pulse between each frame (Movie S2, Figure A,B). In the absence of blue light, microtubules displayed nondirectional movement near the coverslip with only occasional directional events. The strong microtubule enrichment near the coverslip was due to the presence of methylcellulose[27] (Figure S1), whereas the directional events were presumably due to dark-state activation or nonspecific adsorption of the motors to the surface. In contrast, upon global recruitment of kinesins to the coverslip with blue light, microtubules began to move in long directional runs along the coverslip (Figure A,B). Activation was reversible and induction of microtubule gliding could be repeated multiple times in the same region (Figure A,B). Processive microtubule gliding readily increased and decreased upon the start and stop of blue light illumination. However, complete mobilization or immobilization was observed on average after 50–100 s (Figure S1B). Determination of the fold-increase of DmKHC-mCherry-ePDZ during such illumination periods showed a gradual increase and decrease of the motor at the coverslip upon illumination or in the dark. On average a ∼ 2 fold-increase was observed and sufficient to efficiently propel microtubules (Figure S1C,D).
Figure 3

Global reversible control of microtubule gliding assays by blue light. (A) Temporal color-coded maximum projections of 100 one-second interval frames in the absence (white box) and presence (blue box) of light. Arrowheads indicate start (blue) and stop (black) of blue light illumination. See also Movie S2. (B) Zooms of representative 20 s tracks from the regions marked by the white boxes (A). (C) Average velocity of microtubules in (A) in the absence and presence (blue boxes) of light. Average ± s.e.m. For the five subsequent time windows of 26, 53, 43, 55, and 40 microtubule tracks were analyzed, respectively. (D) Mean-squared displacement (MSD) of microtubules in (A) in the absence (black lines) or presence (blue lines) of light. Gray lines depict lines with slopes α of 1 and 2, indicative of diffusive/nondirectional or linear/directional movement. Average ± s.e.m. (E) Fitted values of α for all individual microtubule tracks (≥16 consecutive frames) between the indicated time points. For the five subsequent time windows in the graph 25, 52, 41, 55, and 36 microtubule tracks of 3 independent experiments were analyzed, respectively. Median/IQR. (F) Frequency distribution of pooled values of α in the absence or presence of blue light. One hundred two (dark) and 107 (light) microtubule tracks of 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Scale bars: A, 10 μm; B, 2 μm.

Global reversible control of microtubule gliding assays by blue light. (A) Temporal color-coded maximum projections of 100 one-second interval frames in the absence (white box) and presence (blue box) of light. Arrowheads indicate start (blue) and stop (black) of blue light illumination. See also Movie S2. (B) Zooms of representative 20 s tracks from the regions marked by the white boxes (A). (C) Average velocity of microtubules in (A) in the absence and presence (blue boxes) of light. Average ± s.e.m. For the five subsequent time windows of 26, 53, 43, 55, and 40 microtubule tracks were analyzed, respectively. (D) Mean-squared displacement (MSD) of microtubules in (A) in the absence (black lines) or presence (blue lines) of light. Gray lines depict lines with slopes α of 1 and 2, indicative of diffusive/nondirectional or linear/directional movement. Average ± s.e.m. (E) Fitted values of α for all individual microtubule tracks (≥16 consecutive frames) between the indicated time points. For the five subsequent time windows in the graph 25, 52, 41, 55, and 36 microtubule tracks of 3 independent experiments were analyzed, respectively. Median/IQR. (F) Frequency distribution of pooled values of α in the absence or presence of blue light. One hundred two (dark) and 107 (light) microtubule tracks of 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Scale bars: A, 10 μm; B, 2 μm. To better understand the dynamics of the system, we traced individual microtubules for a more detailed analysis of light-activated microtubule motility. Activation of microtubule gliding led to an increase of the average velocity from ∼150 to ∼450 nm/s, which decreased again when blue light illumination was stopped (Figure C). Importantly, without blue light illumination the motility of most microtubules lacked an overall directionality because their frame-to-frame displacement did not have consistent direction in subsequent frames. This was revealed by an analysis of the mean-squared displacement (MSD), which reports the average squared displacement as a function of time interval. The power dependence α of the MSD with increasing time intervals τ, MSD ∝ τα, is the anomalous diffusion exponent and indicates whether motility is completely random (α ≈ 1, diffusive), directed (1 < α ≤ 2, superdiffusive), or confined (0 < α < 1, subdiffusive).[28] Indeed, a log–log plot of MSD(τ) averaged over all traced microtubules of the represented movie revealed that the average slope for nonilluminated microtubules (α = 1.43) increased after activation (α = 1.89) (Figure D). We also calculated the MSD(τ) for individual microtubules of three independent experiments and fitted the curve to MSD ∝ τα, which revealed a significant increase in the value of α in the presence of light (Median/IQR 1.91:1.72–1.97) compared to the dark state (1.44:1.04–1.78).These results are consistent with an increase in directed microtubule displacement upon illumination (Figure E,F). Finally, we tested whether our experimental setup does not only allow for temporal control but can also provide spatial control of microtubule propulsion. We used a lower magnification epifluorescence microscope equipped with a digital mirror device (DMD). In contrast to local illumination by scanning with a FRAP module, a DMD device is able to achieve fast patterned episcopic illumination, compatible with any magnification. This results in local optical control over a large field of view with low light intensities.[29] We designed an experiment where global microtubule gliding was followed by two episodes of local activation at different locations. Again efficient gliding of microtubules was observed upon global activation (Movie S3, Figure A, left panel). Because of the widefield illumination, signal-to-noise levels were reduced compared to the previous global gliding assays imaged in TIR F at higher magnification. Therefore, to visualize and better understand microtubule motion, we developed an automated method to detect microtubules based on cross-correlation with microtubule templates of different orientations (Figure A, right panel, Figure S2, Movie S4). This automated detection resulted in an accurate representation of the microtubule positions and enabled microtubule tracking (Figure B).
Figure 4

Local control of microtubule motility. (A) Temporal color-coded maximum projection of gliding microtubules after global activation. Raw data (left panel) and detected microtubules (right panel) over a time period of 200 s as indicated by the color-coded scale bar. See also Movie S3. (B) Zooms of the indicated regions in (A). (C) Rules for motion classification of gliding microtubules. (D) Maximum projections of classified tracks upon global and local illumination over 200 s Directional microtubule tracks are depicted in green, and nondirectional tracks in red. The blue box on top shows the illuminated area during different episodes. (E) Fraction of processive microtubules in illuminated (blue) and nonilluminated (gray) areas during each illumination episode. The three bars per indicated period indicate the directional fraction in the left, middle and right area. 234, 165, and 150 tracks were analyzed during the global, left, and right illumination episode, respectively. Scale bars: A, 20 μm; B, 5 μm.

Local control of microtubule motility. (A) Temporal color-coded maximum projection of gliding microtubules after global activation. Raw data (left panel) and detected microtubules (right panel) over a time period of 200 s as indicated by the color-coded scale bar. See also Movie S3. (B) Zooms of the indicated regions in (A). (C) Rules for motion classification of gliding microtubules. (D) Maximum projections of classified tracks upon global and local illumination over 200 s Directional microtubule tracks are depicted in green, and nondirectional tracks in red. The blue box on top shows the illuminated area during different episodes. (E) Fraction of processive microtubules in illuminated (blue) and nonilluminated (gray) areas during each illumination episode. The three bars per indicated period indicate the directional fraction in the left, middle and right area. 234, 165, and 150 tracks were analyzed during the global, left, and right illumination episode, respectively. Scale bars: A, 20 μm; B, 5 μm. To measure the efficiency of light-induced gliding within the assay, directional and nondirectional motility were categorized into separate groups and represented by different colors, green and red, respectively (Figure C, Figure S2, Movie S4). Microtubule movement was classified as directional when the velocity was higher than 250 nm/s and when two consecutive velocity vectors were oriented with an angle whose cosine was larger than 0.6 (Figure C). The other microtubules were classified as nondirectional, which includes slow directional and diffusive, nondirectional movement. This analysis allowed us to discriminate microtubule motion under different illumination schemes where the surface was first lobally illuminated with blue light, followed by sequential illumination of the left and right area to induce local gliding (Figure D). During global illumination, the majority of microtubules was moving directionally across the entire field of view (75–85% directional runs). Conversely, upon local illumination confined microtubule gliding was observed in the activated areas. Quantification of the fraction of processive microtubules showed that during local activation, 77 and 67% of the microtubules were gliding directionally in the left and right area, respectively (Figure D,E). Furthermore, during the local illumination episodes less than 27% of microtubules were processive in the nonilluminated regions. Our results show that the use of light-inducible protein interactions provides robust spatiotemporal control of microtubule gliding assays. Here we have developed light-inducible motor patterning on a homogeneously coated surface to directly control microtubule gliding. This approach allows for both spatial and temporal control of microtubule gliding activity within minutes on micrometer length scales with high efficiency. First, we showed that proteins fused to an ePDZ domain can be reliably coupled to surface immobilized LOVpep. Using an ePDZ-kinesin fusion, motors could be recruited to the coverslip upon activation with light to propel microtubules along the surface. Furthermore, kinesins could be locally recruited to achieve spatial control of microtubule gliding without the need for a prepatterned surface. While previous studies mostly focused on either spatial or temporal control,[12−15,17−19] our adaptive platform now offers simultaneous optical control of both, opening up new possibilities for microtubule gliding assays. Our approach is complementary to a previously developed approach in which a light-to-heat converting layer was used in combination with heat-responsive polymers that compact upon heating and allow access of microtubules to surface-attached motors.[21] However, the current approach requires less surface modifications and does not induce local temperature changes. Compared to previous developments that have used custom-engineered myosin motors to achieve slow (10–20 nm/s) light-controlled gliding of actin filaments, the use of a generic heterodimerization approach makes our approach readily applicable to a variety of different motor proteins.[20] Our approach can be used to reconstitute and understand biological processes that rely on asymmetric forces on complex microtubule arrays. For example, light-inducible control of forces can be used to locally impose forces on reconstituted spindle-like structures or confined microtubule networks to guide the formation of complex microtubule arrays or to study cortical pulling forces.[30,31] Furthermore, light-inducible force generation could directly influence collective motion of microtubules serving as an experimental model for collective and swarming behavior. Future work could explore different light sensitive modules to improve the level of control. For example, phytochrome-based protein interactions enable red-light sensitivity[29,32] and bidirectional control, which could help to improve both temporal and spatial precision. The use of light inducible interactions to control microtubule gliding assays therefore provides exciting new possibilities for reconstituting and understanding complex biophysical and biological processes.
  30 in total

1.  Large-scale vortex lattice emerging from collectively moving microtubules.

Authors:  Yutaka Sumino; Ken H Nagai; Yuji Shitaka; Dan Tanaka; Kenichi Yoshikawa; Hugues Chaté; Kazuhiro Oiwa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics.

Authors:  M J Saxton; K Jacobson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  1997

3.  Label-Free Detection of Microvesicles and Proteins by the Bundling of Gliding Microtubules.

Authors:  Samata Chaudhuri; Till Korten; Slobodanka Korten; Gloria Milani; Tobia Lana; Geertruy Te Kronnie; Stefan Diez
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 4.  Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: two ends in the limelight.

Authors:  Anna Akhmanova; Michel O Steinmetz
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Cortical dynein controls microtubule dynamics to generate pulling forces that position microtubule asters.

Authors:  Liedewij Laan; Nenad Pavin; Julien Husson; Guillaume Romet-Lemonne; Martijn van Duijn; Magdalena Preciado López; Ronald D Vale; Frank Jülicher; Samara L Reck-Peterson; Marileen Dogterom
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Optogenetic control of organelle transport and positioning.

Authors:  Petra van Bergeijk; Max Adrian; Casper C Hoogenraad; Lukas C Kapitein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Spatiotemporal control of cell signalling using a light-switchable protein interaction.

Authors:  Anselm Levskaya; Orion D Weiner; Wendell A Lim; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Remote control of myosin and kinesin motors using light-activated gearshifting.

Authors:  Muneaki Nakamura; Lu Chen; Stuart C Howes; Tony D Schindler; Eva Nogales; Zev Bryant
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 39.213

9.  Sensing surface mechanical deformation using active probes driven by motor proteins.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Takahiro Nitta; Arif Md Rashedul Kabir; Kazuki Sada; Jian Ping Gong; Akihiko Konagaya; Akira Kakugo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  DNA-assisted swarm control in a biomolecular motor system.

Authors:  Jakia Jannat Keya; Ryuhei Suzuki; Arif Md Rashedul Kabir; Daisuke Inoue; Hiroyuki Asanuma; Kazuki Sada; Henry Hess; Akinori Kuzuya; Akira Kakugo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in bioelectronics chemistry.

Authors:  Yin Fang; Lingyuan Meng; Aleksander Prominski; Erik N Schaumann; Matthew Seebald; Bozhi Tian
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Kinesin-4 KIF21B limits microtubule growth to allow rapid centrosome polarization in T cells.

Authors:  Peter Jan Hooikaas; Hugo Gj Damstra; Oane J Gros; Wilhelmina E van Riel; Maud Martin; Yesper Th Smits; Jorg van Loosdregt; Lukas C Kapitein; Florian Berger; Anna Akhmanova
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Lights, cytoskeleton, action: Optogenetic control of cell dynamics.

Authors:  Torsten Wittmann; Alessandro Dema; Jeffrey van Haren
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 4.  Steering Molecular Activity with Optogenetics: Recent Advances and Perspectives.

Authors:  Teak-Jung Oh; Huaxun Fan; Savanna S Skeeters; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Adv Biol (Weinh)       Date:  2021-01-14

5.  Investigation of the Electrical Properties of Microtubule Ensembles under Cell-Like Conditions.

Authors:  Aarat P Kalra; Sahil D Patel; Asadullah F Bhuiyan; Jordane Preto; Kyle G Scheuer; Usman Mohammed; John D Lewis; Vahid Rezania; Karthik Shankar; Jack A Tuszynski
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 6.  The Emerging Roles of Axonemal Glutamylation in Regulation of Cilia Architecture and Functions.

Authors:  Wen-Ting Yang; Shi-Rong Hong; Kai He; Kun Ling; Kritika Shaiv; JingHua Hu; Yu-Chun Lin
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-03-04

7.  Small Peptide-Protein Interaction Pair for Genetically Encoded, Fixation Compatible Peptide-PAINT.

Authors:  Roderick P Tas; Lorenzo Albertazzi; Ilja K Voets
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 11.189

8.  Photoswitchable paclitaxel-based microtubule stabilisers allow optical control over the microtubule cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Adrian Müller-Deku; Joyce C M Meiring; Kristina Loy; Yvonne Kraus; Constanze Heise; Rebekkah Bingham; Klara I Jansen; Xiaoyi Qu; Francesca Bartolini; Lukas C Kapitein; Anna Akhmanova; Julia Ahlfeld; Dirk Trauner; Oliver Thorn-Seshold
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.