Literature DB >> 30449042

Migratory plasticity is not ubiquitous among large herbivores.

Hall Sawyer1, Jerod A Merkle2, Arthur D Middleton3, Samantha P H Dwinnell4, Kevin L Monteith2,4.   

Abstract

The migratory movements of wild animals can promote abundance and support ecosystem functioning. For large herbivores, mounting evidence suggests that migratory behaviour is an individually variable trait, where individuals can easily switch between migrant and resident tactics. The degree of migratory plasticity, including whether and where to migrate, has important implications for the ecology and conservation of large herbivores in a changing world. Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) are an iconic species of western North America, but are notably absent from the body of literature that suggests large herbivore migrations are highly plastic. We evaluated plasticity of migration in female mule deer using longitudinal GPS data collected from 312 individuals across nine populations in the western United States, including 882 animal-years (801 migrants and 81 residents). We followed both resident and migratory mule deer through time to determine whether individual animals switched migratory behaviours (i.e., whether to migrate) from migratory to residency or vice versa. Additionally, we examined the fidelity of individuals to their migration routes (i.e., where to migrate) to determine whether they used the same routes year after year. We also evaluated whether age and reproductive status affected propensity to migrate or fidelity to migratory routes. Our results indicate that mule deer, unlike other large herbivores, have little or no plasticity in terms of whether or where they migrate. Resident deer remained residents, and migrant deer remained migrants, regardless of age, reproductive status or number of years monitored. Further, migratory individuals showed strong fidelity (>80%) to their migration routes year after year. Our study clearly shows that migration plasticity is not ubiquitous among large herbivores. Because of their rigid migratory behaviour, mule deer may not adapt to changing environmental conditions as readily as large herbivores with more plastic migratory behaviour (e.g., elk). The fixed migratory behaviours of mule deer make clear that conservation efforts aimed at traditional seasonal ranges and migration routes are warranted for sustaining this iconic species that continues to decline across its range.
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2018 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioural plasticity; facultative migration; fidelity; migration; mule deer; partial migration; switching behaviour; ungulate

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30449042     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  5 in total

1.  Industrial energy development decouples ungulate migration from the green wave.

Authors:  Ellen O Aikens; Teal B Wyckoff; Hall Sawyer; Matthew J Kauffman
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 19.100

2.  Among-individual and within-individual variation in seasonal migration covaries with subsequent reproductive success in a partially migratory bird.

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Moray Souter; Sarah R Fenn; Paul Acker; Ana Payo-Payo; Sarah J Burthe; Sarah Wanless; Francis Daunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Testing the potential of streamflow data to predict spring migration of ungulate herds.

Authors:  Jason S Alexander; Marissa L Murr; Cheryl A Eddy-Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Phenological drivers of ungulate migration in South America: characterizing the movement and seasonal habitat use of guanacos.

Authors:  Malena Candino; Emiliano Donadio; Jonathan N Pauli
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 5.253

5.  Seasonal movements in caribou ecotypes of Western Canada.

Authors:  Jessica Theoret; Maria Cavedon; Troy Hegel; Dave Hervieux; Helen Schwantje; Robin Steenweg; Megan Watters; Marco Musiani
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.