Literature DB >> 30448970

Dealing with death when studying disease or physiological marker: the stochastic system approach to causality.

Daniel Commenges1.   

Abstract

The stochastic system approach to causality is applied to situations where the risk of death is not negligible. This approach grounds causality on physical laws, distinguishes system and observation and represents the system by multivariate stochastic processes. The particular role of death is highlighted, and it is shown that local influences must be defined on the random horizon of time of death. We particularly study the problem of estimating the effect of a factor V on a process of interest Y, taking death into account. We unify the cases where Y is a counting process (describing an event) and the case where Y is quantitative; we examine the case of observations in continuous and discrete time and we study the issue of whether the mechanism leading to incomplete data can be ignored. Finally, we give an example of a situation where we are interested in estimating the effect of a factor (blood pressure) on cognitive ability in elderly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; Causality; Death; Epidemiology; Joint models; Markers; Stochastic system

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30448970     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-018-9454-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  29 in total

1.  Analysis of longitudinal studies with death and drop-out: a case study.

Authors:  Carole Dufouil; Carol Brayne; David Clayton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Principal stratification and attribution prohibition: good ideas taken too far.

Authors:  Marshall Joffe
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Dynamic path analysis-a new approach to analyzing time-dependent covariates.

Authors:  Johan Fosen; Egil Ferkingstad; Ørnulf Borgan; Odd O Aalen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Principal stratification--uses and limitations.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Joint model with latent state for longitudinal and multistate data.

Authors:  E Dantan; P Joly; J-F Dartigues; H Jacqmin-Gadda
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  The protective impact of a covariate on competing failures with an example from a bone marrow transplantation study.

Authors:  C Di Serio
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Inference in randomized trials with death and missingness.

Authors:  Chenguang Wang; Daniel O Scharfstein; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Timothy D Girard; Ying Yan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Guidelines for reporting methodological challenges and evaluating potential bias in dementia research.

Authors:  Jennifer Weuve; Cécile Proust-Lima; Melinda C Power; Alden L Gross; Scott M Hofer; Rodolphe Thiébaut; Geneviève Chêne; M Maria Glymour; Carole Dufouil
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 21.566

9.  Ignorability for general longitudinal data.

Authors:  D M Farewell; C Huang; V Didelez
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.445

10.  Can we believe the DAGs? A comment on the relationship between causal DAGs and mechanisms.

Authors:  O O Aalen; K Røysland; J M Gran; R Kouyos; T Lange
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.