Literature DB >> 30448503

Impact of prehospital physician-led cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurologically intact survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide population-based observational study.

Yoshikazu Goto1, Akira Funada2, Yumiko Goto3.   

Abstract

AIM: The impact of prehospital physician care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) on long-term neurological outcome is unclear. We aimed to determine the association between emergency medical services (EMS) physician-led cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) versus paramedic-led CPR and neurologically intact survival after OHCA.
METHODS: We assessed 613,251 patients using All-Japan Utstein Registry data from 2011 to 2015 retrospectively. The main outcome measure was 1-month neurologically intact survival after OHCA, defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 (CPC 1-2).
RESULTS: Before propensity score matching, the 1-month CPC 1-2 rate was significantly higher in EMS physician-led CPR than in paramedic-led CPR [5.7% (1114/19,551) vs. 2.5% (14,859/593,700), P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-1.61]. After propensity score matching, EMS physician-led CPR showed more favourable neurological outcomes than paramedic-led CPR [6.0% (996/16,612) vs. 4.6% (766/16,612), P < 0.001; aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.29-1.60]. In most subgroup analyses after matching, physician-led CPR had higher 1-month CPC 1-2 rates than paramedic-led CPR did; however, 1-month CPC 1-2 rates were similar between the two CPR configurations for patients aged <18 years (5.6% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.10; aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.46-1.47) and those who received bystander defibrillation (26.3% vs. 21.5%; P = 0.10; aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74-1.53).
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this retrospective observational research, EMS physician-led CPR for OHCA was associated with improved 1-month neurologically intact survival compared with paramedic-led CPR. However, neurologically intact survival was similar for patients aged <18 years and those receiving bystander defibrillation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Emergency medical services; Epiemiology; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30448503     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  Termination-of-resuscitation rule in the emergency department for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide, population-based observational study.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Goto; Akira Funada; Tetsuo Maeda; Yumiko Goto
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 19.334

2.  Development a clinical prediction model of the neurological outcome for patients with coma and survived 24 hours after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Hai Wang; Long Tang; Li Zhang; Zheng-Liang Zhang; Hong-Hong Pei
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Benefits of adding a physician-staffed ambulance to bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a community-based, observational study in Niigata, Japan.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Sato; Tasuku Matsuyama; Kohei Akazawa; Kyoko Nakazawa; Yasuo Hirose
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Evaluation of a Prehospital Rotation by Senior Residents: A Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Laurent Suppan; Michèle Chan; Birgit Gartner; Simon Regard; Mathieu Campana; Ghislaine Chatellard; Philippe Cottet; Robert Larribau; François Pierre Sarasin; Marc Niquille
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-29

5.  The predictive performance of current termination-of-resuscitation rules in patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Asian countries: A cross-sectional multicentre study.

Authors:  Shu-Hsien Hsu; Jen-Tang Sun; Edward Pei-Chuan Huang; Tatsuya Nishiuchi; Kyoung Jun Song; Benjamin Leong; Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab Rahman; Pairoj Khruekarnchana; G Y Naroo; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Shu-Hui Chang; Wen-Chu Chiang; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.