Literature DB >> 30448451

Similar glycaemic control with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in a 38-week trial comparing the IDegAsp co-formulation with insulin glargine U100 and insulin aspart in basal insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

A Philis-Tsimikas1, K Astamirova2, Y Gupta3, A Haggag4, D Roula5, B A Bak6, E G Fita6, A M Nielsen6, T Demir7.   

Abstract

AIMS: To confirm non-inferiority of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) once-daily (OD) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) U100 OD + insulin aspart (IAsp) OD for HbA1c after 26 weeks, and compare efficacy and safety between groups at W26 + W38.
METHODS: A 38-week, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target (HbA1c < 7.0%) trial in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (on basal insulin ± oral antidiabetic drugs; HbA1c 7.0-10.0%). Randomisation (1:1): IDegAsp or IGlar U100 + IAsp. Intensification to IDegAsp twice daily (BID) was permitted at W26 + W32, or with additional IAsp injections at W26 (maximum IAsp BID) or W32 (maximum IAsp three-times daily).
RESULTS: For W0-W26, mean percentage-change (standard deviation) HbA1c was: IDegAsp, -1.1 (0.9); IGlar U100 + IAsp, -1.1 (0.8); estimated treatment difference: 0.07% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.06; 0.21) confirmed non-inferiority. At W26 and W38, target HbA1c achievement, and mean fasting and postprandial glucose were similar across groups. At W38, more subjects achieved target HbA1c without hypoglycaemia with IDegAsp (22.5%) than with IGlar U100 + IAsp (21.1%), with significantly fewer nocturnal episodes (W0-W38, estimated rate ratio: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.40; 0.93]). Safety profiles were similar across treatment groups throughout.
CONCLUSIONS: IDegAsp OD/BID are effective treatment intensification options versus multiple injection basal-bolus therapies, achieving similar glycaemic control, with significantly less nocturnal hypoglycaemia.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspart; Co-formulation; Diabetes; Glargine; Hypoglycaemia; IDegAsp

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30448451     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  10 in total

1.  A case of an elderly patient with insulin-dependent diabetes and dementia receiving one basal insulin plus one bolus insulin injections a day for 6 months.

Authors:  Taichi Minami; Jun Shirakawa; Akiko Kameda; Yoichi Suzuki; Kaoru Watanabe; Taku Yamada; Hiroko Hiiragi; Soichiro Takeda; Mayuko Takahashi; Yasuo Terauchi
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2020-07-02

Review 2.  Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp) in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Brenda C Edina; Jeremy R Tandaju; Lowilius Wiyono
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 3.  Practical use of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in a multinational setting: beyond the guidelines.

Authors:  Roopa Mehta; Roger Chen; Takahisa Hirose; Mathew John; Adri Kok; Roger Lehmann; Ambika Gopalakrishnan Unnikrishnan; Dilek Gogas Yavuz; Gregory Fulcher
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 4.  Use of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: Expert Panel Recommendations on Appropriate Practice Patterns.

Authors:  Tevfik Demir; Serap Turan; Kursad Unluhizarci; Oya Topaloglu; Tufan Tukek; Dilek Gogas Yavuz
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus over a Period of 1 Year during Routine Clinical Care in India: SMART (Study of Management of Diabetes with Ryzodeg™ Treatment).

Authors:  Jothydev Kesavadev; Ambanna Gowda; Harish Kumar; Sadasiva Rao Yalamanchi; Sailesh Lodha; Kiran Pal Singh; Debasis Basu; Arthur Asirvatham; Navneet Shah; Muzammil Khan Pathan; Manjunatha Revanna; Jagat Jyoti Mukherjee
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  Efficacy of IDegLira Versus IDegAsp Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study by isCGM.

Authors:  Yuji Kawaguchi; Shoko Miyamoto; Yuriko Hajika; Narumi Ashida; Tomoe Hirota; Koji Masumoto; Jun Sawa; Kenji Hamazaki; Yasuro Kumeda
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.070

Review 7.  Twenty Years of Insulin Gla-100: A Systematic Evaluation of Its Efficacy and Safety in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Bipin Sethi; A G Unnikrishnan; Vageesh Ayyar; P K Jabbar; K K Ganguly; Sudhir Bhandari; Ashu Rastogi; Rajarshi Mukherjee; Vivek Sundaram; Adlyne R Asirvatham
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.595

8.  Efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp: Results of a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison.

Authors:  Philip D Home; Roopa Mehta; Khadija A S Hafidh; Olesya Y Gurova; Agustina Alvarez; Paul Serafini; Mir-Masoud Pourrahmat
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 6.408

Review 9.  The Clinical Role of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in Type 2 Diabetes: An Empirical Perspective from Experience in Australia.

Authors:  Sarah J Glastras; Neale Cohen; Thomas Dover; Gary Kilov; Richard J MacIsaac; Margaret McGill; Greg R Fulcher
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Postprandial Glucose Excursions in Asian Versus Non-Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of Baseline Data from Phase 3 Randomised Controlled Trials of IDegAsp.

Authors:  Wenying Yang; Shahid Akhtar; Edward Franek; Martin Haluzík; Takahisa Hirose; Balamurali Kalyanam; Soumitra Kar; Ted Wu; Dilek Gogas Yavuz; Ambika Gopalakrishnan Unnikrishnan
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.945

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.