Literature DB >> 30448350

Exploring determinants of behavioral chronotype in a diurnal-rodent model of human physiology.

Roberto Refinetti1, Gabrielle Earle2, G J Kenagy3.   

Abstract

Numerous studies conducted with human participants have shown that differences in chronotype, defined as individual patterns of early or late beginning of daily activity, have implications for many biobehavioral processes, such as cognitive performance, mood, impulsivity, academic achievement of college students, and mental health. However, the determinants of individual variation in chronotype have not been investigated. Basic research on circadian rhythms has provided a basis for investigating the causes of chronotype variation, but experimental tests of pertinent hypotheses are difficult to conduct with human subjects. This limitation can be overcome by use of animal models. This study was conducted with a rodent species, the antelope ground squirrel (Ammospermophilus leucurus), that, like humans, is active during the daytime, exhibits a spread of chronotypes, and has a similar average free-running circadian period. We found chronotype to be a stable trait within individuals based on strong consistency of separate determinations made six months apart (correlation r = 0.91). We also found a moderate correlation of chronotype with the duration of the active phase (r = -0.51) and with free running period (r = 0.34), but weak correlation with rhythm robustness (r = 0.16), and no correlation with photic responsiveness or with masking responses. The best multiple regression model, incorporating the duration of the active phase, free-running period, and rhythm robustness, explained 38% of the variance in chronotype. Although 62% of the variance in chronotype remained unaccounted for, the results are encouraging because they document the possibility of using a diurnal rodent as a model for the investigation of the determinants of chronotype variation in humans.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal personality; Chronotype; Circadian entrainment; Circadian masking; Circadian rhythm; Locomotor activity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30448350     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  3 in total

1.  Chronotype Variability and Patterns of Light Exposure of a Large Cohort of United States Residents.

Authors:  Roberto Refinetti
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-06-27

2.  Chronotype assessment via a large scale socio-demographic survey favours yearlong Standard time over Daylight Saving Time in central Europe.

Authors:  Martin Sládek; Michaela Kudrnáčová Röschová; Věra Adámková; Dana Hamplová; Alena Sumová
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Chrononutrition and Polyphenols: Roles and Diseases.

Authors:  Anna Arola-Arnal; Álvaro Cruz-Carrión; Cristina Torres-Fuentes; Javier Ávila-Román; Gerard Aragonès; Miquel Mulero; Francisca Isabel Bravo; Begoña Muguerza; Lluís Arola; Manuel Suárez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.