Literature DB >> 30448117

Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Aortic Regurgitation.

Andreas A Kammerlander1, Matthias Wiesinger1, Franz Duca1, Stefan Aschauer1, Christina Binder1, Caroline Zotter Tufaro1, Christian Nitsche1, Roza Badre-Eslam1, Robert Schönbauer2, Philipp Bartko1, Dietrich Beitzke3, Christian Loewe3, Christian Hengstenberg1, Diana Bonderman1, Julia Mascherbauer4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in chronic aortic regurgitation (AR).
BACKGROUND: Accurate quantification of AR severity by echocardiography frequently remains difficult. CMR is recommended as the complementary method; however, its accuracy and prognostic utility remain unknown.
METHODS: A total of 232 consecutive patients (34.5% were females 55.5 ± 19.8 years of age) with chronic AR (including 40 with moderate to severe and 44 with severe AR on echocardiography) underwent CMR within 4 weeks of echocardiography. CMR included phase-contrast velocity-encoded imaging for the measurement of regurgitant volume and fraction at the sinotubular junction and assessment of holodiastolic retrograde flow (HRF) in the descending aorta. Significant AR was defined as the presence of HRF on CMR. Patients were followed prospectively, and multivariate Cox regression was applied for outcome analysis using a combination of heart failure, hospitalization, and cardiovascular death as primary endpoint.
RESULTS: AR severity on the basis of echo was reclassified in a significant number of patients according to CMR: 6.8% with mild AR on echo had HRF on CMR, whereas 34.1% with severe AR on echo did not have HRF on CMR and were reclassified as having nonsignificant AR. In 40 patients with uncertain AR severity (moderate to severe) on echo, 45.0% had HRF on CMR, indicating severe AR. Patients were followed for 35.3 ± 26.6 months. During that period, 63 patients (27.2%) reached the combined endpoint, including 43 (18.5%) with heart failure hospitalizations and 20 (8.6%) with cardiovascular deaths. By multivariate regression analysis, including clinical as well as imaging parameters, only N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (hazard ratio: 2.184 [95% confidence interval: 1.468 to 3.248]; p < 0.001) and HRF on CMR (hazard ratio: 2.774 [95% confidence interval: 1.131 to 6.802]; p = 0.026) remained significantly associated with outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In chronic AR, CMR has the potential to add important diagnostic and prognostic information.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic regurgitation; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; prognosis; quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30448117     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  11 in total

1.  Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Etiology and Mechanism of Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation.

Authors:  David T Harnett; Ibrahim Jelaidan; Munir Boodhwani; Ian G Burwash; Kwan-Leung Chan; Thais Coutinho; Alain Berrebi; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; David Messika-Zeitoun; Luc Beauchesne
Journal:  CASE (Phila)       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 2.  Multimodality Imaging in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Sabir Abdul Karim; Sherif Mahmoud Helmy
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  ANMCO position paper: 2022 focused update of appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging: aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Federico Nardi; Paolo Giuseppe Pino; Leonardo De Luca; Carmine Riccio; Manlio Cipriani; Marco Corda; Giuseppina Maura Francese; Domenico Gabrielli; Fabrizio Oliva; Michele Massimo Gulizia; Furio Colivicchi
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.624

4.  Priorities for Patient-Centered Research in Valvular Heart Disease: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Suzanne V Arnold; Rodrigo Bagur; Lindsay Clarke; Megan Coylewright; Frank Evans; Judy Hung; Sandra B Lauck; Susan Peschin; Vandana Sachdev; Lisa M Tate; Jason H Wasfy; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Assessment of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Regurgitation by Doppler-Derived Echo Indices: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Quantification.

Authors:  Zuzana Hlubocká; Radka Kočková; Hana Línková; Alena Pravečková; Jaroslav Hlubocký; Gabriela Dostálová; Martin Bláha; Martin Pěnička; Aleš Linhart
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  The Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Aortic Stenosis and Regurgitation.

Authors:  Marco Guglielmo; Chiara Rovera; Mark G Rabbat; Gianluca Pontone
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 7.  Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review of Protocols, Grading of Severity, and Prediction of Valve Surgery.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Vermes; Laura Iacuzio; Franck Levy; Yohann Bohbot; Cédric Renard; Bernhard Gerber; Sylvestre Maréchaux; Christophe Tribouilloy
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 8.  Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Gaia Spaziani; Francesca Girolami; Luigi Arcieri; Giovanni Battista Calabri; Giulio Porcedda; Chiara Di Filippo; Francesca Chiara Surace; Marco Pozzi; Silvia Favilli
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 9.  [Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging : Trends and developments].

Authors:  A Mayr; G Reiter; D Beitzke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  Unraveling Bicuspid Aortic Valve Enigmas by Multimodality Imaging: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Arturo Evangelista Masip; Laura Galian-Gay; Andrea Guala; Angela Lopez-Sainz; Gisela Teixido-Turà; Aroa Ruiz Muñoz; Filipa Valente; Laura Gutierrez; Ruben Fernandez-Galera; Guillem Casas; Alejandro Panaro; Alba Marigliano; Marina Huguet; Teresa González-Alujas; Jose Rodriguez-Palomares
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.