Literature DB >> 30447287

Predictors of recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation following cryoablation based pulmonary vein isolation.

Daljeet Kaur1, C Narasimhan2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Editorial; Predictors; Recurrence

Year:  2018        PMID: 30447287      PMCID: PMC6354236          DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J        ISSN: 0972-6292


× No keyword cloud information.
Cryoablation based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a safe and effective method for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Recurrence after cryoablation for PAF is not uncommon [1,2], ranging from 25 to 50%. Celik [3]and coworkers have attempted to identify factors associated with recurrence of PAF after cryoablation of PVs. Recurrence of AF after successful PVI (using radiofrequency catheter ablation)is often due to PV reconnection [4], other factors include non PV triggers, and other focal mechanisms. There are conflicting results about the predictors of AF recurrence after cryoablation based PVI. Present report by Celik et al. [3] published in this issue of Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal addresses this problem. They performed cryoablation based PVI in 50 patients with PAF and followed them for 12months. Left atrial volume (LAV), left atrial volume index (LAVi), serum galactin-3 (Gal-3) level and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) were measured before ablation and at 6 and 12 months of follow-up post ablation. Atrial fibrillation recurred in 14 patients and 36 were free of recurrence. Increased LAV and LAVi measured at baseline were associated with AF recurrence after cryoablation based PVI. However, markers such as Gal-3 and N/L ratio were not helpful to predict AF recurrence in this cohort. If we are able to identify clinical predictors of AF recurrence after cryoablation, it will help us to avoid unnecessary procedures, and complications related to it. It will help patient selection and improve clinical outcome following cryoablation based PVI. Although cryoablation based PVI eliminates the triggers, the effect of atrial substrate is often overlooked. Till date, several predictors of outcome of AF ablation have been identified which includes: age, duration of AF, LA size, number of antiarrhythmic drugs used preablation, early recurrence of AF post ablation and co-morbidities including: obesity, sleep apnoea, hypertension, LA fibrosis [[5], [6], [7], [8]]. The mechanism of AF includes interplay between electrical, contractile and structural remodeling, which are important synergistic components of the AF substrate. Further, the role of metabolic milieu which includes pro-inflammatory, and pro-oxidant environment in the development of AF recurrence after ablation therapy should not be overlooked. Factors related to ongoing inflammation and oxidative stress including:red cell distribution width (RDW), N/L ratio, HsCRP (high sensitivity C- reactive protein) have shown some association with AF [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]]. In a study by Aksu et al., [15] patients with AF recurrence after cryoablation had higher baseline RDW which is a measure of size and variability of red blood cells (RBCs). It is an inexpensive and easily available marker of inflammation and oxidative stress in AF. Higher RDW quartiles are related with left atrial enlargment (LAE), which is known to be an indicator of advanced LA structural remodeling. We can't determine if LAE is the cause or effect of PAF and elevated plasma level of RDW. Thus, further studies are needed to establish exact pathophysiologic and prognostic role of RDW in AF. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness has also been found to be associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation [[16], [17], [18]]. It has been shown that EAT contains numerous autonomic ganglionated plexi, which take part in initiation and continuation of AF [19]. As shown by Kocyigit et al. [20] total periatrial EAT measured with cardiac computed tomography is an independent predictor of AF recurrence in patients undergoing cryoablation. Canpolat et al. [21] investigated the association of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 (a marker of atrial fibrosis) with the extent of LA fibrosis using delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DEMRI), and effects of LA fibrosis on the success of cryoablation for lone AF. Increase in LA fibrosis of >20% predicted AF recurrence after catheter ablation with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 93.75%. Plasma TGF-β1 level >15,894 pg/mL predicted the presence of LA fibrosis with sensitivity of 70.37% and specificity of 100%. Next in line are the autoantibodies, which may have a role in structural atrial remodelling [22]. Anti-M2-R (antimuscarinic acetylcholine receptor antibody) level is a marker of LA fibrosis detected by DE-MRI in paroxysmal lone AF patients. Gurses et al. [23] demonstrated elevated anti-M2-R levels in patients with late recurrence of AF following cryoablation. Thus, by predicting the severity of LA fibrosis in DE-MRI, anti-M2-R levels may improve patient selection for successful AF ablation, avoiding procedures in patients likely to have recurrence of AF. Yalcin et al., [24] determined the preprocedural predictive value of anti-β1-R (autoantibody against β1 adrenergic receptor) levels for AF recurrence. Elevated anti-β1-R levels (>159 ng/mL) was an independent predictor of AF recurrence following cryoablation in this study. Isolation of PVs with cryoablation addresses the triggers, but substrate for perpetuation of AF may continue to remain untreated and progress over time. Conclusion: There is a potential role of inflammatory indices to predict recurrence of AF after cryoablation. Various indices like- RDW, autoantibodies and periatrial fat have been associated with recurrence of AF after cryoablation, but their causal relation is yet to be proven. More work is needed to understand about the predictors of recurrenceof AF following cryoablation based PVI.

Disclosure

None to declare.
  21 in total

1.  Pericardial fat is associated with atrial fibrillation severity and ablation outcome.

Authors:  Christopher X Wong; Hany S Abed; Payman Molaee; Adam J Nelson; Anthony G Brooks; Gautam Sharma; Darryl P Leong; Dennis H Lau; Melissa E Middeldorp; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Gary A Wittert; Walter P Abhayaratna; Stephen G Worthley; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Localization of left atrial ganglionated plexi in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sunny S Po; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Warren M Jackman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06-26

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  Jason G Andrade; Paul Khairy; Peter G Guerra; Marc W Deyell; Lena Rivard; Laurent Macle; Bernard Thibault; Mario Talajic; Denis Roy; Marc Dubuc
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Long-term results and the predictors of outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using steerable sheath catheter navigation after single procedure in 674 patients.

Authors:  Arash Arya; Gerhard Hindricks; Philipp Sommer; Yan Huo; Andreas Bollmann; Thomas Gaspar; Kerstin Bode; Daniela Husser; Hans Kottkamp; Christopher Piorkowski
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Quantitative analysis of quantity and distribution of epicardial adipose tissue surrounding the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation and effect of recurrence after ablation.

Authors:  Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Wei-Chih Hu; Mei-Han Wu; Ching-Tai Tai; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Tsu-Juey Wu; Ming-Huei Sheu; Cheng-Yen Chang; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Prognostic implications of the high-sensitive C-reactive protein in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yenn-Jiang Lin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Yu-Feng Hu; Ameya R Udyavar; Wen-Chin Tsai; Chien-Jung Chang; Ching-Tai Tai; Pi-Chang Lee; Kazuyoshi Suenari; Shih-Yu Huang; Huu Tung Nguyen; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Atrial fibrosis helps select the appropriate patient and strategy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a DE-MRI guided approach.

Authors:  Nazem Akoum; Marcos Daccarett; Chris McGann; Nathan Segerson; Gaston Vergara; Suman Kuppahally; Troy Badger; Nathan Burgon; Thomas Haslam; Eugene Kholmovski; Rob Macleod; Nassir Marrouche
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-08-30

Review 8.  Autoantibodies in atrial fibrillation: actor, biomaker or bystander?

Authors:  Akiyasu Baba; Michael Fu
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.815

Review 9.  Role of inflammation in initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the published data.

Authors:  Tim T Issac; Hisham Dokainish; Nasser M Lakkis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Inflammation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Ronnier J Aviles; David O Martin; Carolyn Apperson-Hansen; Penny L Houghtaling; Pentti Rautaharju; Richard A Kronmal; Russell P Tracy; David R Van Wagoner; Bruce M Psaty; Michael S Lauer; Mina K Chung
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.